Literature DB >> 12625088

Two visual systems and two theories of perception: An attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches.

Joel Norman1.   

Abstract

The two contrasting theoretical approaches to visual perception, the constructivist and the ecological, are briefly presented and illustrated through their analyses of space and size perception. Earlier calls for their reconciliation and unification are reviewed. Neurophysiological, neuropsychological, and psychophysical evidence for the existence of two quite distinct visual systems, the ventral and the dorsal, is presented. These two perceptual systems differ in their functions; the ventral system's central function is that of identification, while the dorsal system is mainly engaged in the visual control of motor behavior. The strong parallels between the ecological approach and the functioning of the dorsal system, and between the constructivist approach and the functioning of the ventral system are noted. It is also shown that the experimental paradigms used by the proponents of these two approaches match the functions of the respective visual systems. A dual-process approach to visual perception emerges from this analysis, with the ecological-dorsal process transpiring mainly without conscious awareness, while the constructivist-ventral process is normally conscious. Some implications of this dual-process approach to visual-perceptual phenomena are presented, with emphasis on space perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12625088     DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x0200002x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Sci        ISSN: 0140-525X            Impact factor:   12.579


  44 in total

1.  Apparent motion cues distort object localisation in egocentric space.

Authors:  Madeleine A Grealy; Yann Coello; Dorothy Heffernan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Early-stage visual processing deficits in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Pamela D Butler; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.741

3.  Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint bias?

Authors:  Cheryl M Glazebrook; Victoria P Dhillon; Katherine M Keetch; James Lyons; Eric Amazeen; Daniel J Weeks; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Does dorsal processing require central capacity? More evidence from the PRP paradigm.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of the tapping literature.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

6.  Action properties of object images facilitate visual search.

Authors:  Michael A Gomez; Jacqueline C Snow
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Multiple systems of spatial memory and action.

Authors:  Marios N Avraamides; Jonathan W Kelly
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-09-27

8.  Attention for perception and action: task interference for action planning, but not for online control.

Authors:  Geniva Liu; Romeo Chua; James T Enns
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Dissociating cognitive and motor interference effects on kinesthetic short-term memory.

Authors:  Waldemar Kirsch; Erwin Hennighausen; Frank Rösler
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-09-02

10.  Advance knowledge effects on kinematics of one-handed catching.

Authors:  Pieter Tijtgat; Simon J Bennett; Geert J P Savelsbergh; Dirk De Clercq; Matthieu Lenoir
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.