Literature DB >> 24599490

The distribution of spatial attention changes with task demands during goal-directed reaching.

Heidi Long1, Anna Ma-Wyatt.   

Abstract

Goal-directed movements are commonly used to allow humans to interact with their environment. When making a goal-directed movement in a natural environment, there are many competing stimuli. It is therefore important to understand how making a goal-directed movement could be impacted by the need to divide attention between the movement and competing stimuli. We used a dual-task paradigm to investigate the sharing of attentional resources between a search task in central vision and a peripheral pointing task completed concurrently. Results suggest some degree of shared attentional resources between these two tasks with performance on both central and peripheral tasks degraded under dual-task conditions. Movement latency, but not movement time, was also affected by dual-task conditions. Altogether, the results suggest that there is a cost to reach performance if attention is engaged away from the movement goal. Interestingly, this cost is associated with movement planning rather than execution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24599490     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3880-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  38 in total

1.  Manual reaction time asymmetries in human subjects: the role of movement planning and attention.

Authors:  S Barthelemy; P Boulinguez
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2001-11-23       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M. Wolfe
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Time course of attention reveals different mechanisms for spatial and feature-based attention in area V4.

Authors:  Benjamin Y Hayden; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Role of focal attention on latencies and trajectories of visually guided manual pointing.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Parietal damage dissociates saccade planning from presaccadic perceptual facilitation.

Authors:  A Z Khan; A Blangero; Y Rossetti; R Salemme; J Luauté; H Deubel; W X Schneider; N Laverdure; G Rode; D Boisson; L Pisella
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Divided attention can enhance memory encoding: the attentional boost effect in implicit memory.

Authors:  Pietro Spataro; Neil W Mulligan; Clelia Rossi-Arnaud
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  The effect of a central task on luminance thresholds for peripherally presented stimuli.

Authors:  H W Leibowitz; S Appelle
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 2.888

9.  Preparing coordinated eye and hand movements: dual-task costs are not attentional.

Authors:  Donatas Jonikaitis; Torsten Schubert; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 10.  Attentional limits and freedom in visually guided action.

Authors:  James T Enns; Geniva Liu
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.453

View more
  2 in total

1.  Do left hand reaction time advantages depend on localising unpredictable targets?

Authors:  Leah T Johnstone; David P Carey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Examining the ability to track multiple moving targets as a function of postural stability: a comparison between team sports players and sedentary individuals.

Authors:  Teresa Zwierko; Piotr Lesiakowski; Beatriz Redondo; Jesús Vera
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 3.061

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.