Literature DB >> 18003931

The relative importance of directional change, random walks, and stasis in the evolution of fossil lineages.

Gene Hunt1.   

Abstract

The nature of evolutionary changes recorded by the fossil record has long been controversial, with particular disagreement concerning the relative frequency of gradual change versus stasis within lineages. Here, I present a large-scale, statistical survey of evolutionary mode in fossil lineages. Over 250 sequences of evolving traits were fit by using maximum likelihood to three evolutionary models: directional change, random walk, and stasis. Evolution in these traits was rarely directional; in only 5% of fossil sequences was directional evolution the most strongly supported of the three modes of change. The remaining 95% of sequences were divided nearly equally between random walks and stasis. Variables related to body size were significantly less likely than shape traits to experience stasis. This finding is in accord with previous suggestions that size may be more evolutionarily labile than shape and is consistent with some but not all of the mechanisms proposed to explain evolutionary stasis. In general, similar evolutionary patterns are observed across other variables, such as clade membership and temporal resolution, but there is some evidence that directional change in planktonic organisms is more frequent than in benthic organisms. The rarity with which directional evolution was observed in this study corroborates a key claim of punctuated equilibria and suggests that truly directional evolution is infrequent or, perhaps more importantly, of short enough duration so as to rarely register in paleontological sampling.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18003931      PMCID: PMC2141789          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0704088104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  8 in total

1.  Tempo and mode of speciation in the sea.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 2.  Why the null matters: statistical tests, random walks and evolution.

Authors:  H D Sheets; C E Mitchell
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 3.  The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macroevolution.

Authors:  S J Arnold; M E Pfrender; A G Jones
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  The contrasting genetic architecture of wing size and shape in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A S Gilchrist; L Partridge
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Individual-level selection as a cause of Cope's rule of phyletic size increase.

Authors:  Joel G Kingsolver; David W Pfennig
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Resolving the paradox of stasis: models with stabilizing selection explain evolutionary divergence on all timescales.

Authors:  Suzanne Estes; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Parallel gradualistic evolution of Ordovician trilobites.

Authors:  P R Sheldon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Dec 10-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  The genetics of stasis and punctuation.

Authors:  J M Smith
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 16.830

  8 in total
  48 in total

1.  The maximum rate of mammal evolution.

Authors:  Alistair R Evans; David Jones; Alison G Boyer; James H Brown; Daniel P Costa; S K Morgan Ernest; Erich M G Fitzgerald; Mikael Fortelius; John L Gittleman; Marcus J Hamilton; Larisa E Harding; Kari Lintulaakso; S Kathleen Lyons; Jordan G Okie; Juha J Saarinen; Richard M Sibly; Felisa A Smith; Patrick R Stephens; Jessica M Theodor; Mark D Uhen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Competition between cryptic species explains variations in rates of lineage evolution.

Authors:  Samuel Alizon; Michal Kucera; Vincent A A Jansen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Ecomorphological selectivity among marine teleost fishes during the end-Cretaceous extinction.

Authors:  Matt Friedman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Morphological stasis in an ongoing gastropod radiation from Lake Malawi.

Authors:  Bert Van Bocxlaer; Gene Hunt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Environmental and scale-dependent evolutionary trends in the body size of crustaceans.

Authors:  Adiël A Klompmaker; Carrie E Schweitzer; Rodney M Feldmann; Michał Kowalewski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Craniofacial form and function in Metriorhynchidae (Crocodylomorpha: Thalattosuchia): modelling phenotypic evolution with maximum-likelihood methods.

Authors:  Mark T Young; Mark A Bell; Stephen L Brusatte
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  The million-year wait for macroevolutionary bursts.

Authors:  Josef C Uyeda; Thomas F Hansen; Stevan J Arnold; Jason Pienaar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Evidence for abrupt speciation in a classic case of gradual evolution.

Authors:  Pincelli M Hull; Richard D Norris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Simple versus complex models of trait evolution and stasis as a response to environmental change.

Authors:  Gene Hunt; Melanie J Hopkins; Scott Lidgard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The future of the fossil record: Paleontology in the 21st century.

Authors:  David Jablonski; Neil H Shubin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.