Literature DB >> 21873251

The million-year wait for macroevolutionary bursts.

Josef C Uyeda1, Thomas F Hansen, Stevan J Arnold, Jason Pienaar.   

Abstract

We lack a comprehensive understanding of evolutionary pattern and process because short-term and long-term data have rarely been combined into a single analytical framework. Here we test alternative models of phenotypic evolution using a dataset of unprecedented size and temporal span (over 8,000 data points). The data are body-size measurements taken from historical studies, the fossil record, and among-species comparative data representing mammals, squamates, and birds. By analyzing this large dataset, we identify stochastic models that can explain evolutionary patterns on both short and long timescales and reveal a remarkably consistent pattern in the timing of divergence across taxonomic groups. Even though rapid, short-term evolution often occurs in intervals shorter than 1 Myr, the changes are constrained and do not accumulate over time. Over longer intervals (1-360 Myr), this pattern of bounded evolution yields to a pattern of increasing divergence with time. The best-fitting model to explain this pattern is a model that combines rare but substantial bursts of phenotypic change with bounded fluctuations on shorter timescales. We suggest that these rare bursts reflect permanent changes in adaptive zones, whereas the short-term fluctuations represent local variations in niche optima due to restricted environmental variation within a stable adaptive zone.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21873251      PMCID: PMC3179053          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1014503108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  28 in total

Review 1.  Rates of evolution on the time scale of the evolutionary process.

Authors:  P D Gingerich
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 2.  The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macroevolution.

Authors:  S J Arnold; M E Pfrender; A G Jones
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Early bursts of body size and shape evolution are rare in comparative data.

Authors:  Luke J Harmon; Jonathan B Losos; T Jonathan Davies; Rosemary G Gillespie; John L Gittleman; W Bryan Jennings; Kenneth H Kozak; Mark A McPeek; Franck Moreno-Roark; Thomas J Near; Andy Purvis; Robert E Ricklefs; Dolph Schluter; James A Schulte Ii; Ole Seehausen; Brian L Sidlauskas; Omar Torres-Carvajal; Jason T Weir; Arne Ø Mooers
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Evolutionary dynamics of vertebrate body mass range.

Authors:  Michael P Gillman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  GEIGER: investigating evolutionary radiations.

Authors:  Luke J Harmon; Jason T Weir; Chad D Brock; Richard E Glor; Wendell Challenger
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Rates of evolution: effects of time and temporal scaling.

Authors:  P D Gingerich
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-10-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Extant mammal body masses suggest punctuated equilibrium.

Authors:  Tiina M Mattila; Folmer Bokma
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  It's about time: the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection in the wild.

Authors:  Adam M Siepielski; Joseph D DiBattista; Stephanie M Carlson
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 9.492

9.  Correlation of tooth size and body size in living hominoid primates, with a note on relative brain size in Aegyptopithecus and Proconsul.

Authors:  P D Gingerich
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.868

10.  Human influences on rates of phenotypic change in wild animal populations.

Authors:  Andrew P Hendry; Thomas J Farrugia; Michael T Kinnison
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  71 in total

1.  Heads or tails: staged diversification in vertebrate evolutionary radiations.

Authors:  Lauren Cole Sallan; Matt Friedman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Measuring the evolution of body size in mammals.

Authors:  P David Polly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Making pore choices: repeated regime shifts in stomatal ratio.

Authors:  Christopher D Muir
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Effects of allometry, productivity and lifestyle on rates and limits of body size evolution.

Authors:  Jordan G Okie; Alison G Boyer; James H Brown; Daniel P Costa; S K Morgan Ernest; Alistair R Evans; Mikael Fortelius; John L Gittleman; Marcus J Hamilton; Larisa E Harding; Kari Lintulaakso; S Kathleen Lyons; Juha J Saarinen; Felisa A Smith; Patrick R Stephens; Jessica Theodor; Mark D Uhen; Richard M Sibly
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Morphological stasis in an ongoing gastropod radiation from Lake Malawi.

Authors:  Bert Van Bocxlaer; Gene Hunt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Sensitivity of quantitative traits to mutational effects and number of loci.

Authors:  Joshua G Schraiber; Michael J Landis
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  Adaptive evolution toward larger size in mammals.

Authors:  Joanna Baker; Andrew Meade; Mark Pagel; Chris Venditti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Simple versus complex models of trait evolution and stasis as a response to environmental change.

Authors:  Gene Hunt; Melanie J Hopkins; Scott Lidgard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  The role of biotic forces in driving macroevolution: beyond the Red Queen.

Authors:  Kjetil L Voje; Øistein H Holen; Lee Hsiang Liow; Nils Chr Stenseth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Why does allometry evolve so slowly?

Authors:  David Houle; Luke T Jones; Ryan Fortune; Jacqueline L Sztepanacz
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.