Literature DB >> 11380659

The contrasting genetic architecture of wing size and shape in Drosophila melanogaster.

A S Gilchrist1, L Partridge.   

Abstract

Surprisingly little is known about the genetic architecture of body size in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Using both generation means and triple-test-cross analyses, we investigated the genetic architecture of wing size (an indicator of body size) and wing shape in a naturally occurring body size cline. For wing size, we found significant epistatic genetic variance and evidence of past directional selection for increased body size. While wing shape also exhibits significant epistatic genetic variance, there was no indication of directional selection, suggesting instead a history of optimizing selection. Our results support the idea that epistatic variance may be more common in natural populations than was once suspected. Also, our results suggest substantial directional selection on wing size but not shape.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11380659     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00779.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  15 in total

1.  Quantitative-genetic analysis of wing form and bilateral asymmetry in isochromosomal lines of Drosophila subobscura using Procrustes methods.

Authors:  Pedro Fernández Iriarte; Walkiria Céspedes; Mauro Santos
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Evolution of the male genitalia: morphological variation of the aedeagi in a natural population of Drosophila mediopunctata.

Authors:  Carlos A C Andrade; R D Vieira; G Ananina; Louis B Klaczko
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  The relative importance of directional change, random walks, and stasis in the evolution of fossil lineages.

Authors:  Gene Hunt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Adaptation to different climates results in divergent phenotypic plasticity of wing size and shape in an invasive drosophilid.

Authors:  Roberta Loh; Jean R David; Vincent Debat; Blanche Christine Bitner-Mathá
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

5.  Directional selection reduces developmental canalization against genetic and environmental perturbations in Drosophila wings.

Authors:  Benjamin R Groth; Yuheng Huang; Matthew J Monette; John E Pool
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Naturally segregating quantitative trait loci affecting wing shape of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jason G Mezey; David Houle; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Parallel effects of the inversion In(3R)Payne on body size across the North American and Australian clines in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M Kapun; C Schmidt; E Durmaz; P S Schmidt; T Flatt
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  Genetic basis of wing morphogenesis in Drosophila: sexual dimorphism and non-allometric effects of shape variation.

Authors:  Valeria P Carreira; Ignacio M Soto; Julián Mensch; Juan J Fanara
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 1.978

9.  From parasite to mutualist: rapid evolution of Wolbachia in natural populations of Drosophila.

Authors:  Andrew R Weeks; Michael Turelli; William R Harcombe; K Tracy Reynolds; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Epistasis regulates the developmental stability of the mouse craniofacial shape.

Authors:  Ceferino Varón-González; Nicolas Navarro
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.