Literature DB >> 22308461

The maximum rate of mammal evolution.

Alistair R Evans1, David Jones, Alison G Boyer, James H Brown, Daniel P Costa, S K Morgan Ernest, Erich M G Fitzgerald, Mikael Fortelius, John L Gittleman, Marcus J Hamilton, Larisa E Harding, Kari Lintulaakso, S Kathleen Lyons, Jordan G Okie, Juha J Saarinen, Richard M Sibly, Felisa A Smith, Patrick R Stephens, Jessica M Theodor, Mark D Uhen.   

Abstract

How fast can a mammal evolve from the size of a mouse to the size of an elephant? Achieving such a large transformation calls for major biological reorganization. Thus, the speed at which this occurs has important implications for extensive faunal changes, including adaptive radiations and recovery from mass extinctions. To quantify the pace of large-scale evolution we developed a metric, clade maximum rate, which represents the maximum evolutionary rate of a trait within a clade. We applied this metric to body mass evolution in mammals over the last 70 million years, during which multiple large evolutionary transitions occurred in oceans and on continents and islands. Our computations suggest that it took a minimum of 1.6, 5.1, and 10 million generations for terrestrial mammal mass to increase 100-, and 1,000-, and 5,000-fold, respectively. Values for whales were down to half the length (i.e., 1.1, 3, and 5 million generations), perhaps due to the reduced mechanical constraints of living in an aquatic environment. When differences in generation time are considered, we find an exponential increase in maximum mammal body mass during the 35 million years following the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) extinction event. Our results also indicate a basic asymmetry in macroevolution: very large decreases (such as extreme insular dwarfism) can happen at more than 10 times the rate of increases. Our findings allow more rigorous comparisons of microevolutionary and macroevolutionary patterns and processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22308461      PMCID: PMC3306709          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1120774109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  14 in total

1.  The pace of modern life II: from rates of contemporary microevolution to pattern and process.

Authors:  M T Kinnison; A P Hendry
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 2.  Rates of evolution on the time scale of the evolutionary process.

Authors:  P D Gingerich
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  The evolution of maximum body size of terrestrial mammals.

Authors:  Felisa A Smith; Alison G Boyer; James H Brown; Daniel P Costa; Tamar Dayan; S K Morgan Ernest; Alistair R Evans; Mikael Fortelius; John L Gittleman; Marcus J Hamilton; Larisa E Harding; Kari Lintulaakso; S Kathleen Lyons; Christy McCain; Jordan G Okie; Juha J Saarinen; Richard M Sibly; Patrick R Stephens; Jessica Theodor; Mark D Uhen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Resolving the paradox of stasis: models with stabilizing selection explain evolutionary divergence on all timescales.

Authors:  Suzanne Estes; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  The relative importance of directional change, random walks, and stasis in the evolution of fossil lineages.

Authors:  Gene Hunt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Paleontology and the comparative method: ancestral node reconstructions versus observed node values.

Authors:  P D Polly
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Rates of evolution: effects of time and temporal scaling.

Authors:  P D Gingerich
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-10-14       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Suggestions as to quantitative measurement of rates of evolution.

Authors:  J B S HALDANE
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1949-03       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Replicated selection for body weight in mice.

Authors:  D S Falconer
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Effects of body size and lifestyle on evolution of mammal life histories.

Authors:  Richard M Sibly; James H Brown
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  34 in total

1.  Measuring the evolution of body size in mammals.

Authors:  P David Polly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Evidence for soft bounds in Ubuntu package sizes and mammalian body masses.

Authors:  Marco Gherardi; Salvatore Mandrà; Bruno Bassetti; Marco Cosentino Lagomarsino
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Effects of allometry, productivity and lifestyle on rates and limits of body size evolution.

Authors:  Jordan G Okie; Alison G Boyer; James H Brown; Daniel P Costa; S K Morgan Ernest; Alistair R Evans; Mikael Fortelius; John L Gittleman; Marcus J Hamilton; Larisa E Harding; Kari Lintulaakso; S Kathleen Lyons; Juha J Saarinen; Felisa A Smith; Patrick R Stephens; Jessica Theodor; Mark D Uhen; Richard M Sibly
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Adaptive evolution toward larger size in mammals.

Authors:  Joanna Baker; Andrew Meade; Mark Pagel; Chris Venditti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Phylogenetic non-independence in rates of trait evolution.

Authors:  Manabu Sakamoto; Chris Venditti
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Adaptive, convergent origins of the pygmy phenotype in African rainforest hunter-gatherers.

Authors:  George H Perry; Matthieu Foll; Jean-Christophe Grenier; Etienne Patin; Yohann Nédélec; Alain Pacis; Maxime Barakatt; Simon Gravel; Xiang Zhou; Sam L Nsobya; Laurent Excoffier; Lluis Quintana-Murci; Nathaniel J Dominy; Luis B Barreiro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Patterns of maximum body size evolution in Cenozoic land mammals: eco-evolutionary processes and abiotic forcing.

Authors:  Juha J Saarinen; Alison G Boyer; James H Brown; Daniel P Costa; S K Morgan Ernest; Alistair R Evans; Mikael Fortelius; John L Gittleman; Marcus J Hamilton; Larisa E Harding; Kari Lintulaakso; S Kathleen Lyons; Jordan G Okie; Richard M Sibly; Patrick R Stephens; Jessica Theodor; Mark D Uhen; Felisa A Smith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The impact of phylogenetic dating method on interpreting trait evolution: a case study of Cretaceous-Palaeogene eutherian body-size evolution.

Authors:  T J D Halliday; A Goswami
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Palaeoanthropology: The dawn of Homo floresiensis.

Authors:  Aida Gómez-Robles
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The Dynamics, Causes, and Impacts of Mammalian Evolutionary Rates Revealed by the Analyses of Capybara Draft Genome Sequences.

Authors:  Isaac Adeyemi Babarinde; Naruya Saitou
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.