Literature DB >> 17997659

The stability of steady state accommodation in human infants.

T Rowan Candy1, Shrikant R Bharadwaj.   

Abstract

Retinal image quality in infants is largely determined by the accuracy and the stability of their accommodative responses. Although the accuracy of infants' accommodation has been investigated previously, little is known about the stability of their responses. We performed two experiments that characterized the stability of infants' steady state accommodation. Analyses were performed in the time domain (root mean square [RMS] deviation) and in the frequency domain (spectral analysis). In Experiment 1, accommodation responses were recorded for a period of 3 s from the left eye of four groups of infants (8-10, 11-13, 14-19, and 20-30 weeks of age) and eight prepresbyopic adults while they focused on a small toy placed at a dioptric viewing distance of 1.0 D (at 1 m). In Experiment 2, accommodation responses were recorded for a period of 14 s from the left eye of a group of 8- to 12-week-old infants and six prepresbyopic adults while they focused on a cartoon image placed at three different dioptric viewing distances (1.25, 2.0, and 3.0 D). The data, collected using a photorefractor sampling at 25 Hz, showed two important characteristics. First, the RMS deviations and the power were quantitatively similar across different infant age groups, and they were significantly larger in infants than in adults. Second, the overall and relative power also increased with the dioptric viewing distance both in infants and adults. At all three dioptric viewing distances, the measures of power were larger in infants than in adults. These data demonstrate that infants' accommodative responses contain instabilities that are qualitatively very similar to those observed in adults. However, the larger RMS deviations suggest that infants are likely to experience larger fluctuations in retinal image quality than adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17997659      PMCID: PMC2755525          DOI: 10.1167/7.11.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  67 in total

1.  A computational model of the error detector of human visual accommodation.

Authors:  J C Kotulak; C M Schor
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  Temporal variations in accommodation during steady-state conditions.

Authors:  J C Kotulak; C M Schor
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Depth of focus, eye size and visual acuity.

Authors:  D G Green; M K Powers; M S Banks
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Effects of stimulus vergence on mean accommodation response, microfluctuations of accommodation and optical quality of the human eye.

Authors:  P Denieul
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The influence of the spatial distribution of a target on the dynamic response and fluctuations of the accommodation of the human eye.

Authors:  L J Bour
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Off-axis image quality in the human eye.

Authors:  J A Jennings; W N Charman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Infant refraction and accommodation.

Authors:  M S Banks
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  1980

8.  Photorefraction of normal and astigmatic infants during viewing of patterned stimuli.

Authors:  V Dobson; H C Howland; C Moss; M S Banks
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Photorefractive studies of normal and handicapped infants and children.

Authors:  H C Howland; N Sayles
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Ocular accommodation in human infants.

Authors:  K E Brookman
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1983-02
View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Why do only some hyperopes become strabismic?

Authors:  Erin Babinsky; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Blur Detection, Depth of Field, and Accommodation in Emmetropic and Hyperopic Children.

Authors:  Tawna L Roberts; Scott B Stevenson; Julia S Benoit; Ruth E Manny; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Age-related changes in accommodative dynamics from preschool to adulthood.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Adrian Glasser; Ruth E Manny; Karla K Stuebing
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Near heterophoria in early childhood.

Authors:  Erin Babinsky; Vidhyapriya Sreenivasan; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Differences between naïve and expert observers' vergence and accommodative responses to a range of targets.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Pupil responses to near visual demand during human visual development.

Authors:  Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Jingyun Wang; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Impact of Cognitive Demand during Sustained Near Tasks in Children and Adults.

Authors:  Tawna L Roberts; Ruth E Manny; Julia S Benoit; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  The effect of lens-induced anisometropia on accommodation and vergence during human visual development.

Authors:  Shrikant R Bharadwaj; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Cues for the control of ocular accommodation and vergence during postnatal human development.

Authors:  Shrikant R Bharadwaj; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  The sensitivity of the 2- to 4-month-old human infant accommodation system.

Authors:  Jingyun Wang; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.