Literature DB >> 21482712

Pupil responses to near visual demand during human visual development.

Shrikant R Bharadwaj1, Jingyun Wang, T Rowan Candy.   

Abstract

Pupil responses of adults to near visual demands are well characterized but those of typically developing infants and children are not. This study determined the following pupil characteristics of infants, children and adults using a PowerRefractor (25 Hz): i) binocular and monocular responses to a cartoon movie that ramped between 80 and 33 cm (20 infants, 20 2-4-yr-olds and 20 adults participated) ii) binocular and monocular response threshold for 0.1 Hz sinusoidal stimuli of 0.25 D, 0.5 D or 0.75 D amplitude (33 infants and 8 adults participated) iii) steady-state stability of pupil responses at 80 cms (8 infants and 8 adults participated). The change in pupil diameter with viewing distance (Δpd) was significantly smaller in infants and 2-4-yr-olds than in adults (p < 0.001) and significantly smaller under monocular than binocular conditions (p<0.001). The 0.75 D sinusoidal stimulus elicited a significant binocular pupillary response in infants and a significant binocular and monocular pupillary response in adults. Steady-state pupillary fluctuations were similar in infants and adults (p = 0.25). The results suggest that the contribution of pupil size to changes in retinal image quality when tracking slow moving objects may be smaller during development than in adulthood. Smaller monocular Δpd reflects the importance of binocular cues in driving near-pupillary responses. © ARVO

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21482712      PMCID: PMC3971874          DOI: 10.1167/11.4.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  65 in total

1.  Pupil unrest: an example of noise in a biological servomechanism.

Authors:  L STARK; F W CAMPBELL; J ATWOOD
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1958-09-27       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence.

Authors:  E F FINCHAM; J WALTON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1957-08-06       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Computerized analysis of pupillograms in studies of alertness.

Authors:  J W McLaren; J C Erie; R F Brubaker
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Dynamic performance of accommodating intraocular lenses in a negative feedback control system: a simulation-based study.

Authors:  Clifton M Schor; Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Christopher D Burns
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 4.589

5.  Laboratory, clinical, and kindergarten test of a new eccentric infrared photorefractor (PowerRefractor).

Authors:  M Choi; S Weiss; F Schaeffel; A Seidemann; H C Howland; B Wilhelm; H Wilhelm
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Subject instructions and methods of target presentation in accommodation research.

Authors:  L R Stark; D A Atchison
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Pupillary micro movements apparently related to pulse frequency.

Authors:  K M Daum; G A Fry
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Off-axis image quality in the human eye.

Authors:  J A Jennings; W N Charman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Pupil size and visual resolution.

Authors:  G Westheimer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  [Age dependence of pupillary near reflex].

Authors:  H Wilhelm; F Schaeffel; B Wilhelm
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 0.700

View more
  7 in total

1.  Empirical variability in the calibration of slope-based eccentric photorefraction.

Authors:  Shrikant R Bharadwaj; N Geetha Sravani; Julie-Anne Little; Asa Narasaiah; Vivian Wong; Rachel Woodburn; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Photorefraction estimates of refractive power varies with the ethnic origin of human eyes.

Authors:  N Geetha Sravani; Vinay Kumar Nilagiri; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Calibration of the PlusOptix PowerRef 3 with change in viewing distance, adult age and refractive error.

Authors:  Saeideh Ghahghaei; Olivia Reed; T Rowan Candy; Arvind Chandna
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Spasm of Near Reflex: Objective Assessment of the Near-Triad.

Authors:  Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Saujanwita Roy; PremNandhini Satgunam
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Pupillary Responses Obey Emmert's Law and Co-vary with Autistic Traits.

Authors:  Chiara Tortelli; Marco Turi; David C Burr; Paola Binda
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-08

6.  Trying to see, failing to focus: near visual impairment in Down syndrome.

Authors:  Lesley Doyle; Kathryn J Saunders; Julie-Anne Little
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Pupil response components: attention-light interaction in patients with Parinaud's syndrome.

Authors:  Paola Binda; Torsten Straßer; Krunoslav Stingl; Paul Richter; Tobias Peters; Helmut Wilhelm; Barbara Wilhelm; Carina Kelbsch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.