Literature DB >> 19146280

Cues for the control of ocular accommodation and vergence during postnatal human development.

Shrikant R Bharadwaj1, T Rowan Candy.   

Abstract

Accommodation and vergence help maintain single and focused visual experience while an object moves in depth. The relative importance of retinal blur and disparity, the primary sensory cues to accommodation and vergence, is largely unknown during development; a period when growth of the eye and head necessitate continual recalibration of egocentric space. Here we measured the developmental importance of retinal disparity in 192 typically developing subjects (1.9 months to 46 years). Subjects viewed high-contrast cartoon targets with naturalistic spatial frequency spectra while their accommodation and vergence responses were measured from both eyes using a PowerRefractor. Accommodative gain was reduced during monocular viewing relative to full binocular viewing, even though the fixating eye generated comparable tracking eye movements in the two conditions. This result was consistent across three forms of monocular occlusion. The accommodative gain was lowest in infants and only reached adult levels by 7 to 10 years of age. As expected, the gain of vergence was also reduced in monocular conditions. When 4- to 6-year-old children read 20/40-sized letters, their monocular accommodative gain reached adult-like levels. In summary, binocular viewing appears necessary under naturalistic viewing conditions to generate full accommodation and vergence responses in typically developing humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19146280      PMCID: PMC2643357          DOI: 10.1167/8.16.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  81 in total

1.  Sensitive period for the development of human binocular vision.

Authors:  M S Banks; R N Aslin; R D Letson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-11-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The adaptive effect of narrowing the interocular separation on the AC/A ratio.

Authors:  Bai-Chuan Jiang; Ramkumar Ramamirtham
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Binocular interactions in accommodation control: effects of anisometropic stimuli.

Authors:  D I Flitcroft; S J Judge; J W Morley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Neuronal circuitry controlling the near response.

Authors:  L E Mays; P D Gamlin
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Accommodation responses to flickering stimuli.

Authors:  K Chauhan; W N Charman
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Accommodation in binocular contour rivalry.

Authors:  D I Flitcroft; J W Morley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Accommodation function of the human eye.

Authors:  F M Toates
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 37.312

8.  Subject instructions and methods of target presentation in accommodation research.

Authors:  L R Stark; D A Atchison
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  'Preferential looking' for monocular and binocular acuity testing of infants.

Authors:  J Atkinson; O Braddick; E Pimm-Smith
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Acuity and contrast sensitivity in 1-, 2-, and 3-month-old human infants.

Authors:  M S Banks; P Salapatek
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  27 in total

1.  Evidence that convergence rather than accommodation controls intermittent distance exotropia.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.761

2.  Two-dimensional simulation of eccentric photorefraction images for ametropes: factors influencing the measurement.

Authors:  Yifei Wu; Larry N Thibos; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Why do only some hyperopes become strabismic?

Authors:  Erin Babinsky; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Blur Detection, Depth of Field, and Accommodation in Emmetropic and Hyperopic Children.

Authors:  Tawna L Roberts; Scott B Stevenson; Julia S Benoit; Ruth E Manny; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Differences between naïve and expert observers' vergence and accommodative responses to a range of targets.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Pupil responses to near visual demand during human visual development.

Authors:  Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Jingyun Wang; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The effect of lens-induced anisometropia on accommodation and vergence during human visual development.

Authors:  Shrikant R Bharadwaj; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Receding and disparity cues aid relaxation of accommodation.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Accommodative and vergence responses to conflicting blur and disparity stimuli during development.

Authors:  Shrikant R Bharadwaj; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Empirical variability in the calibration of slope-based eccentric photorefraction.

Authors:  Shrikant R Bharadwaj; N Geetha Sravani; Julie-Anne Little; Asa Narasaiah; Vivian Wong; Rachel Woodburn; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.