Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 A computational model of the error detector of human visual accommodation.

Literature DB >> 3741894

A computational model of the error detector of human visual accommodation.

Abstract

A mathematical model is proposed for the error detector of the human visual accommodative system. The model supposes that the accommodative error detector derives both the direction and the magnitude of the accommodative error from naturally-occurring oscillations of the lens and their effects on retinal-image contrast. Differential operators take the first derivatives of two time varying functions: lens power and retinal-image contrast. Directional information is obtained by comparing the signs of these two derivatives and magnitude information is obtained by comparing their amplitudes.

Entities: Species

Mesh：

Year: 1986 PMID： 3741894 DOI： 10.1007/bf00356857

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Cybern ISSN： 0340-1200 Impact factor: 2.086

21 in total

1. Integral control in accommodation.

Authors: V V Krishnan; L Stark
Journal: Comput Programs Biomed Date: 1975-08

2. The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence.

Authors: E F FINCHAM; J WALTON
Journal: J Physiol Date: 1957-08-06 Impact factor: 5.182

3. The stimulus to accommodation.

Authors: M J ALLEN
Journal: Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom Date: 1955-08

4. The accommodation reflex and its stimulus.

Authors: E F FINCHAM
Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 1951-07 Impact factor: 4.638

5. The accommodative response to subthreshold blur and to perceptual fading during the Troxler phenomenon.

Authors: J C Kotulak; C M Schor
Journal: Perception Date: 1986 Impact factor: 1.490

Review 6. Accommodation function of the human eye.

Authors: F M Toates
Journal: Physiol Rev Date: 1972-10 Impact factor: 37.312

7. Accommodative response to blur.

Authors: L M Smithline
Journal: J Opt Soc Am Date: 1974-11

8. Stereoscopic depth movement: two eyes less sensitive than one.

Authors: C W Tyler
Journal: Science Date: 1971-11-26 Impact factor: 47.728

9. Feedback control analysis of accommodative convergence.

Authors: J Brodkey; L Stark
Journal: Am J Surg Date: 1967-07 Impact factor: 2.565

10. The effects of optical vergence, contrast, and luminance on the accommodative response to spatially bandpass filtered targets.

Authors: J C Kotulak; C M Schor
Journal: Vision Res Date: 1987 Impact factor: 1.886

13 in total

1. Dynamic control of ocular disaccommodation: first and second-order dynamics.

Authors: Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Clifton M Schor
Journal: Vision Res Date: 2005-07-19 Impact factor: 1.886

2. The impact of higher-order aberrations on the strength of directional signals produced by accommodative microfluctuations.

Authors: Sangeetha Metlapally; Jianliang L Tong; Humza J Tahir; Clifton M Schor
Journal: J Vis Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 2.240

A computational model of the error detector of human visual accommodation.

1. Integral control in accommodation.

2. The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence.

3. The stimulus to accommodation.

4. The accommodation reflex and its stimulus.

5. The accommodative response to subthreshold blur and to perceptual fading during the Troxler phenomenon.

Review 6. Accommodation function of the human eye.

7. Accommodative response to blur.

8. Stereoscopic depth movement: two eyes less sensitive than one.

9. Feedback control analysis of accommodative convergence.

10. The effects of optical vergence, contrast, and luminance on the accommodative response to spatially bandpass filtered targets.

1. Dynamic control of ocular disaccommodation: first and second-order dynamics.

2. The impact of higher-order aberrations on the strength of directional signals produced by accommodative microfluctuations.

3. Creating correct blur and its effect on accommodation.

4. The first and second order dynamics of accommodative convergence and disparity convergence.

5. Validation of the PowerRef 3 for Measuring Accommodation: Comparison With the Grand Seiko WAM-5500A Autorefractor.

6. The stability of steady state accommodation in human infants.

7. Static and dynamic crystalline lens accommodation evaluated using quantitative 3-D OCT.

8. Effect of temporal location of correction of monochromatic aberrations on the dynamic accommodation response.

9. Chaos in ocular aberration dynamics of the human eye.

10. Potential role for microfluctuations as a temporal directional cue to accommodation.