Literature DB >> 21296822

The effect of lens-induced anisometropia on accommodation and vergence during human visual development.

Shrikant R Bharadwaj1, T Rowan Candy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Clear and single binocular vision, a prerequisite for normal human visual development, is achieved through accommodation and vergence. Anisometropia is associated with abnormal visual development, but its impact on accommodation and vergence, and therefore on the individual's visual experience, is not known. This study determined the impact of transiently induced anisometropia on accommodative and vergence performance of the typically developing human visual system.
METHODS: One hundred eighteen subjects (age range, 2.9 months to 41.1 years) watched a cartoon movie that moved between 80 and 33 cm under six different viewing conditions: binocular and monocular, and with ±2 diopters (D) and ±4 D of lens-induced anisometropia. Twenty-one subjects (age range, 3.1 months to 12.1 years) also watched the movie with 11% induced aniseikonia. Accommodation and vergence were recorded in both eyes using a videoretinoscope (25 Hz).
RESULTS: The main effect of viewing condition was statistically significant for both accommodation and vergence (both P < 0.001), with monocular accommodative and vergence gains statistically significantly smaller than the binocular and four induced anisometropia conditions (P < 0.001 for both accommodation and vergence). The main effect of age approached significance for accommodation (P = 0.06) and was not significant for vergence (P = 0.32). Accommodative and vergence gains with induced aniseikonia were not statistically significantly different from the binocular condition (both P > 0.5).
CONCLUSIONS: Accommodative and vergence gains of the typically developing visual system deteriorated marginally (accommodation more than vergence) with transiently induced anisometropia (up to ±4 D) and did not deteriorate significantly with induced aniseikonia of 11%. Some binocular cues remained with ±4 D of induced anisometropia and 11% induced aniseikonia, as indicated by the accommodative and vergence gains being higher than in monocular viewing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21296822      PMCID: PMC3109043          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-6214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  62 in total

1.  Lens induced aniso-accommodation.

Authors:  L Marran; C M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  How is binocularity maintained during convergence and divergence?

Authors:  S J Judge
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Natural history of infantile anisometropia.

Authors:  M Abrahamsson; J Sjöstrand
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Anisometropia and amblyopia--chicken or egg?

Authors:  A R Fielder; M J Moseley
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Slope-based eccentric photorefraction: theoretical analysis of different light source configurations and effects of ocular aberrations.

Authors:  A Roorda; M C Campbell; W R Bobier
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Subject instructions and methods of target presentation in accommodation research.

Authors:  L R Stark; D A Atchison
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Relationship between anisometropia, amblyopia, and binocularity.

Authors:  R P Rutstein; D Corliss
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 8.  Prevention of amblyopia and the concept of cure.

Authors:  J Sjöstrand; M Abrahamsson
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.922

Review 9.  Preschool vision screening: rationale, methodology and outcome.

Authors:  K Simons
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

10.  Inter-individual variability in the dynamics of natural accommodation in humans: relation to age and refractive errors.

Authors:  F Schaeffel; H Wilhelm; E Zrenner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  The relationship between anisometropia and amblyopia.

Authors:  Brendan T Barrett; Arthur Bradley; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 2.  The Importance of the Interaction Between Ocular Motor Function and Vision During Human Infancy.

Authors:  T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 6.422

3.  Determining the relative contribution of retinal disparity and blur cues to ocular accommodation in Down syndrome.

Authors:  Lesley Doyle; Kathryn J Saunders; Julie-Anne Little
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Active efficient coding explains the development of binocular vision and its failure in amblyopia.

Authors:  Samuel Eckmann; Lukas Klimmasch; Bertram E Shi; Jochen Triesch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Trying to see, failing to focus: near visual impairment in Down syndrome.

Authors:  Lesley Doyle; Kathryn J Saunders; Julie-Anne Little
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Effective and Efficient Stand Magnifier Use in Visually Impaired Children.

Authors:  Joyce Liebrand-Schurink; Ralf F A Cox; Ger H M B van Rens; Antonius H N Cillessen; Ruud G J Meulenbroek; Frouke N Boonstra
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-23

7.  Asymmetrical accommodation in hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Sonia Toor; Anna M Horwood; Patricia Riddell
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Eyes of Aniso-Axial Length Individuals Share Generally Similar Corneal Biometrics with Normal Eyes in Cataract Population.

Authors:  Min Zhang; Tianhui Chen; Michael Deng; Jiahui Chen; Qinghe Jing; Yongxiang Jiang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 1.909

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.