Literature DB >> 27438596

Why do pregnant women accept or decline prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome?

Ellen Ternby1, Ove Axelsson2,3, Göran Annerén4, Peter Lindgren2,5, Charlotta Ingvoldstad2,5.   

Abstract

To investigate if actual knowledge of Down syndrome (DS), influences the decision to accept or decline prenatal diagnosis (PND). Secondary aims were to elucidate reasons for accepting or declining PND and investigate differences between the accepting and declining group in perceived information, knowing someone with DS and thoughts about decision-making. A questionnaire was completed by 76 pregnant women who underwent invasive testing and 65 women who declined tests for chromosomal aberrations in Uppsala, Sweden. Apart from one question no significant differences were found in knowledge of DS between women declining or accepting PND for DS. Both groups had varying and in several respects low levels of knowledge about DS and its consequences. Most common reasons to accept PND were 'to ease my worries' and 'to do all possible tests to make sure the baby is healthy'. Corresponding statements declining PND were 'termination of pregnancy is not an option' and 'because invasive tests increase the risk of miscarriage'. More women declining PND knew someone with DS. Knowledge of DS at these levels is not a major factor when women decide to accept or decline PND for DS. Their choice is mostly based on opinions and moral values.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision-making; Down syndrome; Informed choice; Knowledge of condition screened for; Prenatal diagnosis

Year:  2016        PMID: 27438596      PMCID: PMC4960031          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-016-0272-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  10 in total

1.  'This is just what you do when you are pregnant': a qualitative study of prospective parents in Iceland who accept nuchal translucency screening.

Authors:  Helga Gottfredsdóttir; Jane Sandall; Kristín Björnsdóttir
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 2.372

2.  Why women say yes to prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  N Press; C H Browner
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Information and knowledge about Down syndrome among women and partners after first trimester combined testing.

Authors:  Ellen Ternby; Charlotta Ingvoldstad; Göran Annerén; Peter Lindgren; Ove Axelsson
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  Participation in prenatal screening tests and intentions concerning selective termination in Finnish maternity care.

Authors:  P Santalahti; E Hemminki; A R Aro; H Helenius; M Ryynänen
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.587

5.  On what grounds do women participate in prenatal screening?

Authors:  P Santalahti; A R Aro; E Hemminki; H Helenius; M Ryynänen
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 6.  Informed consent: providing information about prenatal examinations.

Authors:  Katja Dahl; Ulrik Kesmodel; Lone Hvidman; Frede Olesen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.636

7.  Informed consent to serum screening for Down syndrome: are women given adequate information?

Authors:  J Gekas; J Gondry; S Mazur; P Cesbron; F Thepot
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  The impact of ethical beliefs on decisions about prenatal screening tests: searching for justification.

Authors:  Elisa García; Danielle R M Timmermans; Evert van Leeuwen
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  How do prospective parents who decline prenatal screening account for their decision? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Helga Gottfredsdóttir; Kristín Björnsdóttir; Jane Sandall
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Informed choice: understanding knowledge in the context of screening uptake.

Authors:  Susan Michie; Elizabeth Dormandy; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2003-07
  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Knowledge of Prenatal Screening, Down Syndrome, Amniocentesis, and Related Factors among Iranian Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Maryam Rabiee; Zahra Jouhari; Ashraf Pirasteh
Journal:  Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery       Date:  2019-04

Review 2.  Decision-making factors in prenatal testing: A systematic review.

Authors:  Valentina Di Mattei; Federica Ferrari; Gaia Perego; Valentina Tobia; Fabio Mauro; Massimo Candiani
Journal:  Health Psychol Open       Date:  2021-01-13

3.  Limits to the scope of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): an analysis of the international ethical framework for prenatal screening and an interview study with Dutch professionals.

Authors:  A Kater-Kuipers; E M Bunnik; I D de Beaufort; R J H Galjaard
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Reasons for non-participation in malformation scans in Denmark: a cohort study.

Authors:  Karina Hjort-Pedersen; Annette Wind Olesen; Ester Garne; Lene Sperling
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.