Literature DB >> 20536536

Information and decision support needs of parents considering amniocentesis: interviews with pregnant women and health professionals.

Marie-Anne Durand1, Mareike Stiel, Jacky Boivin, Glyn Elwyn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to clarify and categorize information and decision support needs of pregnant women deciding about amniocentesis.
BACKGROUND: Prenatal screening for Down's syndrome (implemented in routine practice) generates a quantifiable risk of chromosome abnormality. To increase certainty, chromosomal material needs to be obtained through amniocentesis or other diagnostic test. Amniocentesis carries risks of pregnancy loss.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with health professionals and pregnant women who had considered amniocentesis. The data were qualitatively analysed using a two-step thematic content analysis.
RESULTS: A sample of 17 health professionals and 17 pregnant women were interviewed. Professionals demonstrated little consensus regarding the miscarriage rate, the potential consequences of amniocentesis testing and the uncertainty associated with the tests. Furthermore, methods employed to communicate risks varied between professionals. Pregnant women reported heightened stress and anxiety. Twelve out of 17 women described the decision as complex and difficult to make while five participants were satisfied with the information and support provided. Women would have liked more information about the risks involved, the results, the consequences of an amniocentesis and associated emotional difficulties. Women highlighted the need for personalized information, presented in multiple ways, while remaining simple and unbiased.
CONCLUSIONS: There is variation in the provision of information related to amniocentesis testing. The majority of pregnant women reported difficulties making a decision and identified dimensions of information and decision support where improvements were needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20536536      PMCID: PMC5060523          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00544.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  40 in total

Review 1.  Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data.

Authors:  C Pope; S Ziebland; N Mays
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-08

2.  From poor performance to success under stress: working memory, strategy selection, and mathematical problem solving under pressure.

Authors:  Sian L Beilock; Marci S Decaro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Fetal loss after amniocentesis in a series of 5,780 procedures.

Authors:  P Gaudry; G Grangé; A Lebbar; A Choiset; S Girard; F Goffinet; F Lewin
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.587

4.  Serum screening for Down's syndrome: how much do health professionals know?

Authors:  M Sadler
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1997-02

5.  Do women know that prenatal testing detects fetuses with Down syndrome?

Authors:  A M Jaques; J L Halliday; R J Bell
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Women's knowledge, concerns and psychological reactions before undergoing an invasive procedure for prenatal karyotyping.

Authors:  M Cederholm; O Axelsson; P O Sjödén
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 7.  Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: a challenge to practice and policy.

Authors:  A Asch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Assessment of maternal anxiety levels before and after amniocentesis.

Authors:  C C M Ng; F M Lai; G S H Yeo
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.858

9.  Individual risk of fetal loss following routine second trimester amniocentesis: a controlled study of 20,460 cases.

Authors:  P Kozlowski; A Knippel; R Stressig
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 6.548

Review 10.  Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review.

Authors:  J M Green; J Hewison; H L Bekker; L D Bryant; H S Cuckle
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.014

View more
  13 in total

1.  Comparing genetic counselor's and patient's perceptions of needs in prenatal chromosomal microarray testing.

Authors:  Sarah A Walser; Katherine S Kellom; Steven C Palmer; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Continuing Education Module-Information Needs and Information-Seeking Processes of Low-Income Pregnant Women in Relation to Digital Maternity Education Resources.

Authors:  Adriana Arcia; Samantha Stonbraker; Eva Rose Asaan Warner
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2019-07-01

3.  It's complicated - Factors predicting decisional conflict in prenatal diagnostic testing.

Authors:  Cécile Muller; Linda D Cameron
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Trait anxiety, information modality, and responses to communications about prenatal genetic testing.

Authors:  Cécile Muller; Linda D Cameron
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-01-31

5.  On the suitability of fast and frugal heuristics for designing values clarification methods in patient decision aids: a critical analysis.

Authors:  Arwen H Pieterse; Marieke de Vries
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Design and usability of heuristic-based deliberation tools for women facing amniocentesis.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Durand; Odette Wegwarth; Jacky Boivin; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  A design process for using normative models in shared decision making: a case study in the context of prenatal testing.

Authors:  Sivan Rapaport; Moshe Leshno; Lior Fink
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Is preparation a good reason for prenatal genetic testing? Ethical and critical questions.

Authors:  Marsha Michie
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Termination of Pregnancy for Fetal Anomalies: A Qualitative Study of the Informational and Educational Needs of Women.

Authors:  Bahareh Kamranpour; Mahnaz Noroozi; Masoud Bahrami
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2021-03-05

10.  Impact of prenatal care provider on the use of ancillary health services during pregnancy.

Authors:  Amy Metcalfe; Kristen Grabowska; Carol Weller; Suzanne C Tough
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.