Literature DB >> 17992698

Psychological distress and quality of life associated with genetic testing for breast cancer risk.

Ashley Wilder Smith1, Angela Liegey Dougall, Donna M Posluszny, Tamara J Somers, Wendy S Rubinstein, Andrew Baum.   

Abstract

This study investigated short- and long-term psychological outcomes associated with BRCA1/2 genetic testing in women with a personal or family history of breast cancer. Participants included 126 women considering genetic testing. Questionnaires were administered prior to testing, one week, three and six months after result disclosure. Results indicated no systematic effects of testing based on personal cancer history. Mutation carriers and women who elected not to be tested reported greater perceived risk and intrusive and avoidant thoughts at follow-up time points than did women who received negative (uninformative) or variant results. Mutation carriers reported more distress at the three-month follow-up but by six months the effects of test result on distress dissipated and groups were comparable. Cluster analyses identified two groups of individuals based on distress at baseline; these groups were used to predict psychological outcomes after testing. Distress remained constant in both groups: those who were high at baseline remained high and those who were low remained low. Test results did not moderate this effect. Results suggest that genetic testing for BRCA1/2 does not increase distress or have deleterious effects on quality of life over the long term. However, sub-groups of women may report more distress over time. These data indicate the need for more targeted counseling to individuals who report high levels of distress when considering genetic testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17992698     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  28 in total

1.  Points to consider in assessing and appraising predictive genetic tests.

Authors:  Wolf H Rogowski; Scott D Grosse; Jürgen John; Helena Kääriäinen; Alastair Kent; Ulf Kristofferson; Jörg Schmidtke
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2010-10-16

2.  Is it time to offer BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing to all Jewish women?

Authors:  K A Metcalfe; A Eisen; J Lerner-Ellis; S A Narod
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Identification of cognitive profiles among women considering BRCA1/2 testing through the utilisation of cluster analytic techniques.

Authors:  Pagona Roussi; Kerry A Sherman; Suzanne M Miller; Karen Hurley; Mary B Daly; Andrew Godwin; Joanne S Buzaglo; Kuang-Yi Wen
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2011-07-14

Review 4.  Challenges of translating genetic tests into clinical and public health practice.

Authors:  Wolf H Rogowski; Scott D Grosse; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 5.  Patient responses to genetic information: studies of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes identify issues for use of genetic testing in nephrology practice.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaphingst; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.299

Review 6.  Predictors of genetic testing decisions: a systematic review and critique of the literature.

Authors:  Kate Sweeny; Arezou Ghane; Angela M Legg; Ho Phi Huynh; Sara E Andrews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  Psychological aspects, risk and protective factors related to BRCA genetic testing: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Lucia Lombardi; Sonia M Bramanti; Alessandra Babore; Liborio Stuppia; Carmen Trumello; Ivana Antonucci; Alessandra Cavallo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Improved health perception after genetic counselling for women at high risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer: construction of new questionnaires--an Italian exploratory study.

Authors:  Chiara Catania; Irene Feroce; Monica Barile; Aron Goldhirsch; Tommaso De Pas; Filippo de Braud; Sabrina Boselli; Laura Adamoli; Davide Radice; Alessandra Rossi; Gianluca Spitaleri; Cristina Noberasco; Bernardo Bonanni
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Distress among women receiving uninformative BRCA1/2 results: 12-month outcomes.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Christine Rini; Rachel E Goldsmith; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Lawrence H Cohen; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Biopsychological stress factors in BRCA mutation carriers.

Authors:  Lari Wenzel; Kathyrn Osann; Jenny Lester; Raluca Kurz; Susie Hsieh; Edward L Nelson; Beth Karlan
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.