Literature DB >> 23157996

Biopsychological stress factors in BRCA mutation carriers.

Lari Wenzel1, Kathyrn Osann, Jenny Lester, Raluca Kurz, Susie Hsieh, Edward L Nelson, Beth Karlan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cancer risk-related stressors are prominent among BRCA mutation carriers. Loss of one's mother to a BRCA-associated cancer is an additional stressor, which may be related to an enhanced inflammatory response. This study examined the effect of mother's vital status on psychological factors and stress-associated biomarkers among BRCA mutation carriers. The role of bereavement on biopsychological variables was also examined.
METHODS: BRCA-carriers with known maternal transmission enrolled in the Gilda Radner Hereditary Cancer Program were invited to participate. Focus group composition was predetermined based on participants' personal cancer history and mother's vital status. Prior to the focus group, participants completed a Quality of Life (QOL) survey and collected a first morning saliva sample. Inflammatory biomarkers were analyzed from proximal archived serum. One day post focus group, a process survey, and morning saliva were collected.
RESULTS: QOL was significantly lower for those whose mothers are deceased (n = 17) compared to those whose mothers are alive (n = 15) (P = 0.003) after adjusting for age, personal cancer history and prophylactic surgery. Similarly, those whose mothers are deceased reported significantly more perceived stress (P = 0.015), more intrusive thoughts related to cancer risk (P = 0.049), and more anxiety (P = 0.003). Higher bereavement scores were significantly associated with QOL and psychological measures. Biomarker correlates were consistent with and significantly correlated to the patient-reported psychological outcomes for those whose mothers were deceased.
CONCLUSIONS: BRCA mutation carriers with a known maternal transmission whose mother is deceased report higher perceived stress and anxiety, lower QOL, and a stress-associated biomarker profile that is potentially globally immune suppressive.
Copyright © 2012 The Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23157996      PMCID: PMC4572843          DOI: 10.1016/j.psym.2012.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychosomatics        ISSN: 0033-3182            Impact factor:   2.386


  44 in total

1.  Stress and genetic testing for disease risk.

Authors:  A Baum; A L Friedman; S G Zakowski
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Measuring core bereavement phenomena.

Authors:  P Burnett; W Middleton; B Raphael; N Martinek
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.723

3.  The influence of psychological distress on use of genetic testing for cancer risk.

Authors:  C Lerman; M D Schwartz; T H Lin; C Hughes; S Narod; H T Lynch
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1997-06

4.  Mice deficient in tumor necrosis factor-alpha are resistant to skin carcinogenesis.

Authors:  R J Moore; D M Owens; G Stamp; C Arnott; F Burke; N East; H Holdsworth; L Turner; B Rollins; M Pasparakis; G Kollias; F Balkwill
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 5.  Adherence and psychological adjustment among women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  C Lerman; M Schwartz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 6.  Psychological impact of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: an update of the literature.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Predictors of intrusive thoughts and avoidance in women with family histories of breast cancer.

Authors:  S G Zakowski; H B Valdimarsdottir; D H Bovbjerg; P Borgen; J Holland; K Kash; D Miller; J Mitnick; M Osborne; K Van Zee
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1997

8.  BRCA1 testing in families with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. A prospective study of patient decision making and outcomes.

Authors:  C Lerman; S Narod; K Schulman; C Hughes; A Gomez-Caminero; G Bonney; K Gold; B Trock; D Main; J Lynch; C Fulmore; C Snyder; S J Lemon; T Conway; P Tonin; G Lenoir; H Lynch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) scale. Development of a brain subscale and revalidation of the general version (FACT-G) in patients with primary brain tumors.

Authors:  M A Weitzner; C A Meyers; C K Gelke; K S Byrne; D F Cella; V A Levin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Psychological distress among healthy women with family histories of breast cancer: effects of recent life events.

Authors:  Youngmee Kim; Katherine N Duhamel; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  7 in total

1.  Exploring Relationships Among Peripheral Amyloid Beta, Tau, Cytokines, Cognitive Function, and Psychosomatic Symptoms in Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Ashley Henneghan; Andreana P Haley; Shelli Kesler
Journal:  Biol Res Nurs       Date:  2019-11-10       Impact factor: 2.522

2.  BRCA1 germline mutations may be associated with reduced ovarian reserve.

Authors:  Erica T Wang; Margareta D Pisarska; Catherine Bresee; Yii-Der Ida Chen; Jenny Lester; Yalda Afshar; Carolyn Alexander; Beth Y Karlan
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Perceptions and care Recommendations from Previvors: Qualitative analysis of female BRCA1/2 mutation Carriers' experience with genetic testing and counseling.

Authors:  Kate E Dibble; Laura K M Donorfio; Preston A Britner; Keith M Bellizzi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-05-02

Review 4.  Rethinking ovarian cancer II: reducing mortality from high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  David D Bowtell; Steffen Böhm; Ahmed A Ahmed; Paul-Joseph Aspuria; Robert C Bast; Valerie Beral; Jonathan S Berek; Michael J Birrer; Sarah Blagden; Michael A Bookman; James D Brenton; Katherine B Chiappinelli; Filipe Correia Martins; George Coukos; Ronny Drapkin; Richard Edmondson; Christina Fotopoulou; Hani Gabra; Jérôme Galon; Charlie Gourley; Valerie Heong; David G Huntsman; Marcin Iwanicki; Beth Y Karlan; Allyson Kaye; Ernst Lengyel; Douglas A Levine; Karen H Lu; Iain A McNeish; Usha Menon; Steven A Narod; Brad H Nelson; Kenneth P Nephew; Paul Pharoah; Daniel J Powell; Pilar Ramos; Iris L Romero; Clare L Scott; Anil K Sood; Euan A Stronach; Frances R Balkwill
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Stress, anxiety, and health-related quality of life in BRCA1/2-positive women with and without cancer: A comparison of four US female samples.

Authors:  Kate E Dibble; Laura K M Donorfio; Preston A Britner; Keith M Bellizzi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-06-20

6.  Cost-Effectiveness of BRCA 1/2 Genetic Test and Preventive Strategies: Using Real-World Data From an Upper-Middle Income Country.

Authors:  Marina Lourenção; Julia Simões Correa Galendi; Henrique de Campos Reis Galvão; Augusto Perazzolo Antoniazzi; Rebeca Silveira Grasel; André Lopes Carvalho; Edmundo Carvalho Mauad; Jorge Henrique Caldeira de Oliveira; Rui Manuel Reis; Olena Mandrik; Edenir Inêz Palmero
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  A Cross-Sectional Exploration of Cytokine-Symptom Networks in Breast Cancer Survivors Using Network Analysis.

Authors:  Ashley Henneghan; Michelle L Wright; Garrett Bourne; Adam C Sales
Journal:  Can J Nurs Res       Date:  2020-06-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.