Literature DB >> 3505194

An analysis of bone structure in patients with hip fracture.

P J Uitewaal1, P Lips, J C Netelenbos.   

Abstract

The prevalence of osteoporosis in patients with hip fracture is not well defined. We performed a histomorphometric analysis of bone structural parameters in transilial biopsies of 39 patients with hip fracture (21 cervical, 18 trochanteric), 23 patients with one or more vertebral crush fractures and 20 control subjects. Trabecular bone volume (TBV) and trabecular surface density (Sv) were significantly lower in trochanteric than in cervical fractures. Mean trabecular plate thickness (MTPT), mean wall thickness (MWT) and TBV were significantly lower in trochanteric fractures than in the control group. Vertebral crush fractures are mainly characterized by a decreased TBV and Sv. There was a strong positive correlation between MWT and MTPT in trochanteric fractures suggesting that the decreased trabecular thickness in this group is due to decreased osteoblastic apposition. Trochanteric fractures are associated with serious osteoporosis, whereas cervical fractures constitute a more heterogeneous group. The osteoporosis of trochanteric fractures is characterized by significant trabecular thinning, whereas that of vertebral fractures is mainly associated with loss of trabecular plates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3505194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Miner        ISSN: 0169-6009


  16 in total

1.  MRI of bone marrow in the distal radius: in vivo precision of effective transverse relaxation times.

Authors:  S Grampp; S Majumdar; M Jergas; P Lang; A Gies; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparison of femoral morphology and bone mineral density between femoral neck fractures and trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Yuki Maeda; Nobuhiko Sugano; Masanobu Saito; Kazuo Yonenobu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  The pathogenesis and treatment of hip fractures.

Authors:  P Lips; K J Obrant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Increasing age-adjusted risk of fragility fractures: a sign of increasing osteoporosis in successive generations?

Authors:  K J Obrant; U Bengnér; O Johnell; B E Nilsson; I Sernbo
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Different characteristics of cervical and trochanteric hip fractures.

Authors:  C A Mautalen; E M Vega
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Assessment of trabecular bone structure comparing magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla with high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography ex vivo and in vivo.

Authors:  R Krug; J Carballido-Gamio; A J Burghardt; G Kazakia; B H Hyun; B Jobke; S Banerjee; M Huber; T M Link; S Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Total and regional bone mineral content and fracture rate in postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with salmon calcitonin: a prospective study.

Authors:  H Rico; M Revilla; E R Hernández; L F Villa; M Alvarez de Buergo
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 8.  Bone remodeling in hip fracture.

Authors:  J Reeve; J M Zanelli; N Garrahan; J N Bradbeer; J S Wand; S T Moyes; J P Roux; T Smith
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  The measurement of osteoporosis in clinical practice.

Authors:  E R Hernandez; F Gomez-Castresana; L F Villa; H Rico
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Bone mineral density in patients with cervical and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur.

Authors:  E Vega; C Mautalen; H Gómez; A Garrido; L Melo; A O Sahores
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.