Literature DB >> 17991922

Use of patient-reported outcomes in phase III cancer treatment trials: lessons learned and future directions.

Patricia A Ganz1, Carolyn C Gotay.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This article examines the challenges, opportunities, and successes that have occurred in the incorporation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in phase III cancer clinical trials.
METHODS: An informal survey of the leadership of US cooperative group PRO investigators identified diverse trials in which PROs had been measured. Exemplary trials were selected for lessons learned and for examination of successful strategies.
RESULTS: We review four challenging trials in depth, illustrating some of the difficulties in integrating PROs within treatment trials, including issues related to missing data, lack of procedures for monitoring patients and ensuring collection of PRO data, and missed opportunities in publication of treatment and PRO outcomes together. Four examples of successful trials are highlighted.
CONCLUSION: As a result of this review, the authors make specific recommendations related to the use of PROs in phase III trials, focusing on issues related to design, choice of PRO instrument and frequency of administration, analysis, and publication strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17991922     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.0197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  12 in total

1.  Development of the National Cancer Institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE).

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Bryce B Reeve; Sandra A Mitchell; Steven B Clauser; Lori M Minasian; Amylou C Dueck; Tito R Mendoza; Jennifer Hay; Thomas M Atkinson; Amy P Abernethy; Deborah W Bruner; Charles S Cleeland; Jeff A Sloan; Ram Chilukuri; Paul Baumgartner; Andrea Denicoff; Diane St Germain; Ann M O'Mara; Alice Chen; Joseph Kelaghan; Antonia V Bennett; Laura Sit; Lauren Rogak; Allison Barz; Diane B Paul; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  United States Population-Based Estimates of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Symptom and Functional Status Reference Values for Individuals With Cancer.

Authors:  Roxanne E Jensen; Arnold L Potosky; Carol M Moinpour; Tania Lobo; David Cella; Elizabeth A Hahn; David Thissen; Ashley Wilder Smith; Jaeil Ahn; George Luta; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Patient-reported outcome use in oncology: a systematic review of the impact on patient-clinician communication.

Authors:  L Y Yang; D S Manhas; A F Howard; R A Olson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Quality of life across chemotherapy lines in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a prospective single-center observational study.

Authors:  Beate Mayrbäurl; Johannes M Giesinger; Sonja Burgstaller; Gudrun Piringer; Bernhard Holzner; Josef Thaler
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Ranked importance of outcomes of first-line versus repeated chemotherapy among ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Vanessa L Beesley; Alexandra M Clavarino; Penelope M Webb; David K Wyld; Alessandra B Francesconi; Keith R Horwood; James D Doecke; Colleen A Loos; Adele C Green
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  A Systematic Review of Health-Related Quality of Life Reporting in Ovarian Cancer Phase III Clinical Trials: Room to Improve.

Authors:  Michelle K Wilson; Michael L Friedlander; Florence Joly; Amit M Oza
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-11-08

7.  Adverse symptom event reporting by patients vs clinicians: relationships with clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Xiaoyu Jia; Glenn Heller; Allison Barz; Laura Sit; Michael Fruscione; Mark Appawu; Alexia Iasonos; Thomas Atkinson; Shari Goldfarb; Ann Culkin; Mark G Kris; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  The validity and utility of the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory in patients with breast cancer: evidence from the symptom outcomes and practice patterns data from the eastern cooperative oncology group.

Authors:  Tito R Mendoza; Fengmin Zhao; Charles S Cleeland; Lynne I Wagner; Linda J Patrick-Miller; Michael J Fisch
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Systematic collection of patient reported outcome research data: A checklist for clinical research professionals.

Authors:  Leslie Wehrlen; Mike Krumlauf; Elizabeth Ness; Damiana Maloof; Margaret Bevans
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 2.226

10.  Feasibility Assessment of Patient Reporting of Symptomatic Adverse Events in Multicenter Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Amylou C Dueck; Lauren J Rogak; Lori M Minasian; William Kevin Kelly; Ann M O'Mara; Andrea M Denicoff; Drew Seisler; Pamela J Atherton; Electra Paskett; Lisa Carey; Maura Dickler; Rebecca S Heist; Andrew Himelstein; Hope S Rugo; William M Sikov; Mark A Socinski; Alan P Venook; Douglas J Weckstein; Diana E Lake; David D Biggs; Rachel A Freedman; Charles Kuzma; Jeffrey J Kirshner; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.