Literature DB >> 27002223

Systematic collection of patient reported outcome research data: A checklist for clinical research professionals.

Leslie Wehrlen1, Mike Krumlauf2, Elizabeth Ness3, Damiana Maloof4, Margaret Bevans5.   

Abstract

Understanding the human experience is no longer an outcome explored strictly by social and behavioral researchers. Increasingly, biomedical researchers are also including patient reported outcomes (PROs) in their clinical research studies not only due to calls for increased patient engagement in research but also healthcare. Collecting PROs in clinical research studies offers a lens into the patient's unique perspective providing important information to industry sponsors and the FDA. Approximately 30% of trials include PROs as primary or secondary endpoints and a quarter of FDA new drug, device and biologic applications include PRO data to support labeling claims. In this paper PRO, represents any information obtained directly from the patient or their proxy, without interpretation by another individual to ascertain their health, evaluate symptoms or conditions and extends the reference of PRO, as defined by the FDA, to include other sources such as patient diaries. Consumers and clinicians consistently report that PRO data are valued, and can aide when deciding between treatment options; therefore an integral part of clinical research. However, little guidance exists for clinical research professionals (CRPs) responsible for collecting PRO data on the best practices to ensure quality data collection so that an accurate assessment of the patient's view is collected. Therefore the purpose of this work was to develop and validate a checklist to guide quality collection of PRO data. The checklist synthesizes best practices from published literature and expert opinions addressing practical and methodological challenges CRPs often encounter when collecting PRO data in research settings. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trials; Guidance; Patient diary; Patient reported outcome; Questionnaire; Self-reported data

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27002223      PMCID: PMC4885791          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  48 in total

1.  Collecting quality of life data in EORTC clinical trials--what happens in practice?

Authors:  T Young; J Maher
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 2.  The use of real-time patient-reported outcomes and quality-of-life data in oncology clinical practice.

Authors:  Michele Y Halyard
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  Applying item response theory and computer adaptive testing: the challenges for health outcomes assessment.

Authors:  Peter M Fayers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-04-07       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Methods for quality-of-life studies.

Authors:  M A Testa; J F Nackley
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 5.  Patient-reported outcomes in support of oncology product labeling claims: regulatory context and challenges.

Authors:  Yanni Hao
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Quality of life assessment in clinical trials--guidelines and a checklist for protocol writers: the U.K. Medical Research Council experience. MRC Cancer Trials Office.

Authors:  P M Fayers; P Hopwood; A Harvey; D J Girling; D Machin; R Stephens
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Challenges to use of health-related quality of life for Food and Drug Administration approval of anticancer products.

Authors:  Edwin P Rock; Jane A Scott; Dianne L Kennedy; Rajeshwari Sridhara; Richard Pazdur; Laurie B Burke
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2007

Review 8.  Methods and problems in measuring quality of life.

Authors:  D F Cella
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.

Authors:  An-Wen Chan; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman; Andreas Laupacis; Peter C Gøtzsche; Karmela Krleža-Jerić; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Howard Mann; Kay Dickersin; Jesse A Berlin; Caroline J Doré; Wendy R Parulekar; William S M Summerskill; Trish Groves; Kenneth F Schulz; Harold C Sox; Frank W Rockhold; Drummond Rennie; David Moher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Quality of life assessment in clinical cancer research.

Authors:  M Olschewski; G Schulgen; M Schumacher; D G Altman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Their Role in Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Cindy J Nowinski; Deborah M Miller; David Cella
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  Go Ask Your Patients! PSS-QoL Reported Perception of Dryness Correlates With Lacrimal and Salivary Flow in Primary Sjögren's Syndrome.

Authors:  Angelika Lackner; Philipp Bosch; Sabine Zenz; Jutta Horwath-Winter; Dieter Franz Rabensteiner; Josef Hermann; Winfried Graninger; Martin Helmut Stradner
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-04-15

3.  Moving Beyond the Momentum: Innovative Approaches to Clinical Trial Implementation.

Authors:  Cathy Eng; Emerson Y Chen; Jane Rogers; Mark Lewis; Jonathan Strosberg; Ramya Thota; Smitha Krishnamurthi; Paul Oberstein; Rang Govindarajan; Gary Buchschacher; Sandip Patel; Davendra Sohal; Taymeyah Al-Toubah; Philip Philip; Arvind Dasari; Hagan Kennecke; Stacey Stein
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-02-03

4.  Knowledge translation resources to support the use of quality of life assessment tools for the care of older adults living at home and their family caregivers.

Authors:  Kara Schick-Makaroff; Richard Sawatzky; Lena Cuthbertson; Joakim Öhlén; Autumn Beemer; Dominique Duquette; Mehri Karimi-Dehkordi; Kelli I Stajduhar; Nitya Suryaprakash; Landa Terblanche; Angela C Wolff; S Robin Cohen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 3.440

5.  Generic quality of life in persons with hearing loss: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Øyvind Nordvik; Peder O Laugen Heggdal; Jonas Brännström; Flemming Vassbotn; Anne Kari Aarstad; Hans Jørgen Aarstad
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2018-01-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.