PURPOSE: To examine the importance of possible outcomes of first-line versus repeated chemotherapy to ovarian cancer patients and to compare doctors' treatment intentions with patients' beliefs about cure. METHODS: Women with newly diagnosed (74) or relapsed (48) ovarian cancer were prospectively followed over 2 years. The level of importance they ascribed to four chemotherapy outcomes and their beliefs about cure were assessed. Their doctors independently specified intent of successive treatments. RESULTS: Approximately half (54%) of newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients (65% with residual disease >2 cm and 49% with no or < or =2 cm residual disease) ranked 'tumour shrinkage (or decrease in blood levels of CA125)' as 'most important' during first-line chemotherapy. Approximately two thirds (65-70%) of all women whose disease had relapsed also ranked 'tumour shrinkage' as 'most important' during repeated chemotherapy. Few women (<8%) rated symptom relief or absence of side-effects as most important. While both patients' and doctors' belief about cure decreased over successive treatments, patients grew more optimistic relative to doctors over time. Women's reports of advice by doctors about cure were consistent with doctors' stated intent for repeat chemotherapy. However, discordance between doctors' actual treatment intent and patients' beliefs about cure increased from 24% at first-line to 83% by fourth-line chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Women prioritise tumour response as the most important outcome of chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. This priority predominates in women with residual and relapsed disease despite declining likelihood of cure. Women may still hope for a cure while acknowledging their doctor's advice that their disease is incurable.
PURPOSE: To examine the importance of possible outcomes of first-line versus repeated chemotherapy to ovarian cancerpatients and to compare doctors' treatment intentions with patients' beliefs about cure. METHODS:Women with newly diagnosed (74) or relapsed (48) ovarian cancer were prospectively followed over 2 years. The level of importance they ascribed to four chemotherapy outcomes and their beliefs about cure were assessed. Their doctors independently specified intent of successive treatments. RESULTS: Approximately half (54%) of newly diagnosed ovarian cancerpatients (65% with residual disease >2 cm and 49% with no or < or =2 cm residual disease) ranked 'tumour shrinkage (or decrease in blood levels of CA125)' as 'most important' during first-line chemotherapy. Approximately two thirds (65-70%) of all women whose disease had relapsed also ranked 'tumour shrinkage' as 'most important' during repeated chemotherapy. Few women (<8%) rated symptom relief or absence of side-effects as most important. While both patients' and doctors' belief about cure decreased over successive treatments, patients grew more optimistic relative to doctors over time. Women's reports of advice by doctors about cure were consistent with doctors' stated intent for repeat chemotherapy. However, discordance between doctors' actual treatment intent and patients' beliefs about cure increased from 24% at first-line to 83% by fourth-line chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS:Womenprioritise tumour response as the most important outcome of chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. This priority predominates in women with residual and relapsed disease despite declining likelihood of cure. Women may still hope for a cure while acknowledging their doctor's advice that their disease is incurable.
Authors: I Vergote; G J Rustin; E A Eisenhauer; G B Kristensen; E Pujade-Lauraine; M K Parmar; M Friedlander; A Jakobsen; J B Vermorken Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-09-20 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: S J Jansen; J Kievit; M A Nooij; J C de Haes; I M Overpelt; H van Slooten; E Maartense; A M Stiggelbout Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2001-06-15 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: G F Beadle; P M Yates; J M Najman; A Clavarino; D Thomson; G Williams; L Kenny; S Roberts; B Mason; D Schlect Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-07-19 Impact factor: 7.640