BACKGROUND: The M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) is a psychometrically validated patient-reported outcome measurement that assesses the severity and impact of multiple symptoms related to cancer and its treatment. With the MDASI, patients rate 13 common "core" symptoms and 6 items that reflect symptom interference with functioning. Several MDASI modules (core symptom and interference items plus additional symptoms specific to a particular cancer type or treatment modality) have been developed. Although the original MDASI validation study encompassed various cancer types, the instrument's psychometric properties have not been examined in a homogenous sample of patients with breast cancer in a national multicenter study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of data from an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study to establish the reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the MDASI in a large sample of patients with breast cancer (n = 1544), 78% of whom were receiving treatment. The instrument was administered twice, approximately 1 month apart. RESULTS: Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were adequate, with Cronbach α values ≥ 0.85 and intraclass correlations ≥ 0.76 for all subscales. Known-group validity was evaluated by using performance status, tumor response, and disease stage. Sensitivity to change in patient-reported quality of life was established. CONCLUSION: The MDASI is a valid, reliable, and sensitive symptom-assessment instrument that can enhance descriptive and clinical studies of symptom status in patients with breast cancer. Future studies might include cognitive debriefing and qualitative interviews to identify additional disease-specific items for inclusion in a MDASI breast cancer module.
BACKGROUND: The M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) is a psychometrically validated patient-reported outcome measurement that assesses the severity and impact of multiple symptoms related to cancer and its treatment. With the MDASI, patients rate 13 common "core" symptoms and 6 items that reflect symptom interference with functioning. Several MDASI modules (core symptom and interference items plus additional symptoms specific to a particular cancer type or treatment modality) have been developed. Although the original MDASI validation study encompassed various cancer types, the instrument's psychometric properties have not been examined in a homogenous sample of patients with breast cancer in a national multicenter study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of data from an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study to establish the reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the MDASI in a large sample of patients with breast cancer (n = 1544), 78% of whom were receiving treatment. The instrument was administered twice, approximately 1 month apart. RESULTS: Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were adequate, with Cronbach α values ≥ 0.85 and intraclass correlations ≥ 0.76 for all subscales. Known-group validity was evaluated by using performance status, tumor response, and disease stage. Sensitivity to change in patient-reported quality of life was established. CONCLUSION: The MDASI is a valid, reliable, and sensitive symptom-assessment instrument that can enhance descriptive and clinical studies of symptom status in patients with breast cancer. Future studies might include cognitive debriefing and qualitative interviews to identify additional disease-specific items for inclusion in a MDASI breast cancer module.
Authors: Kathleen J Yost; Susan E Yount; David T Eton; Cheryl Silberman; Anne Broughton-Heyes; David Cella Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: M A Sprangers; M Groenvold; J I Arraras; J Franklin; A te Velde; M Muller; L Franzini; A Williams; H C de Haes; P Hopwood; A Cull; N K Aaronson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1996-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Charles S Cleeland; Jeff A Sloan; David Cella; Connie Chen; Amylou C Dueck; Nora A Janjan; Astra M Liepa; Rajiv Mallick; Ann O'Mara; Jay D Pearson; Yasuhiro Torigoe; Xin Shelley Wang; Loretta A Williams; Jeanie F Woodruff Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: M J Brady; D F Cella; F Mo; A E Bonomi; D S Tulsky; S R Lloyd; S Deasy; M Cobleigh; G Shiomoto Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michelle A Neben-Wittich; Pamela J Atherton; David J Schwartz; Jeff A Sloan; Patricia C Griffin; Richard L Deming; Jon C Anders; Charles L Loprinzi; Kelli N Burger; James A Martenson; Robert C Miller Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-10-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: T S Armstrong; T Mendoza; I Gning; I Gring; C Coco; M Z Cohen; L Eriksen; Ming-Ann Hsu; M R Gilbert; C Cleeland Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2006-04-06 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Ian R Kleckner; Charles Kamen; Jennifer S Gewandter; Nimish A Mohile; Charles E Heckler; Eva Culakova; Chunkit Fung; Michelle C Janelsins; Matthew Asare; Po-Ju Lin; Pavan S Reddy; Jeffrey Giguere; Jeffrey Berenberg; Shelli R Kesler; Karen M Mustian Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-12-14 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Loretta A Williams; Meagan S Whisenant; Tito R Mendoza; Shireen Haq; Karen N Keating; Brian Cuffel; Charles S Cleeland Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Karin Piil; Meagan Whisenant; Tito Mendoza; Terri Armstrong; Charles Cleeland; Sara Nordentoft; Loretta A Williams; Mary Jarden Journal: Neurooncol Pract Date: 2020-10-19
Authors: Meagan S Whisenant; Loretta A Williams; Tito Mendoza; Charles Cleeland; Tsun-Hsuan Chen; Michael J Fisch; Quiling Shi Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2021-12-28 Impact factor: 2.760
Authors: Anita R Peoples; Wilfred R Pigeon; Dongmei Li; Sheila N Garland; Michael L Perlis; Julia E Inglis; Vincent Vinciguerra; Thomas Anderson; Lisa S Evans; James L Wade; Deborah J Ossip; Gary R Morrow; Julie Ryan Wolf Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Charles Cleeland; Roger von Moos; Mark S Walker; Yuanyuan Wang; Jianqing Gao; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Alexander Liede; Jorge Arellano; Arun Balakumaran; Yi Qian Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-03-29 Impact factor: 3.603