Literature DB >> 28426375

United States Population-Based Estimates of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Symptom and Functional Status Reference Values for Individuals With Cancer.

Roxanne E Jensen1, Arnold L Potosky1, Carol M Moinpour1, Tania Lobo1, David Cella1, Elizabeth A Hahn1, David Thissen1, Ashley Wilder Smith1, Jaeil Ahn1, George Luta1, Bryce B Reeve1.   

Abstract

Purpose To estimate cancer population-based reference values in the United States for eight PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) domains by age and stage of disease. Patients and Methods For the Measuring Your Health (MY-Health) study, persons newly diagnosed with cancer (prostate, colorectal, non-small-cell lung, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, breast, uterine, or cervical) from 2010 to 2012 (N = 5,284) were recruited through the National Cancer Institute's SEER Program. Participants were mailed surveys 6 to 13 months after diagnosis. Raking by race/ethnicity, age, and stage generated weighted average PROMIS scores for pain interference, fatigue, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, physical function, ability to participate in social roles, and cognitive function. PROMIS measures are standardized to a T-score metric, with a score of 50 representing the general US population mean. Clinically meaningful differences were defined as a 3-point difference in scores. Results Several reference values (means) for patients with cancer were worse than the general United States population norms of 50. These include pain interference (52.4), fatigue (52.2), and physical function (44.1). Reference values were highest (ie, showed greatest symptom burden) in lung cancer (pain interference, 55.5; fatigue, 57.3; depression, 51.4) and cervical cancer (anxiety, 53.2; sleep disturbance, 53.4). Reference values for patients age 65 to 84 years reported lower sleep disturbance, anxiety, and depression, and better cognitive function than younger patients. Cancer reference values were poorer among those with advanced disease compared with patients with limited or no evidence of disease, specifically physical function (41.1 v 46.6, respectively), fatigue (55.8 v 50.2, respectively), and pain interference (55.2 v 50.9, respectively). Conclusion In a large, population-based sample of patients with recently diagnosed cancer, we observed symptom severity and functional deficits by age, stage, and cancer type consistent with the expected impact of cancer diagnosis and treatment. These United States cancer reference values can help facilitate interpretation of the PROMIS domain scores in research studies or in clinical applications that measure and evaluate the symptom and functional burden patients with cancer experience after initial treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28426375      PMCID: PMC5466008          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.4410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  31 in total

1.  Patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer trials: evaluating and enhancing the payoff to decision making.

Authors:  Steven B Clauser; Patricia A Ganz; Joseph Lipscomb; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Symone B Detmar; Martin J Muller; Jan H Schornagel; Lidwina D V Wever; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Generalizability of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registry population: factors relevant to epidemiologic and health care research.

Authors:  A B Nattinger; T L McAuliffe; M M Schapira
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 4.  Current status of patient-reported outcomes in industry-sponsored oncology clinical trials and product labels.

Authors:  Kathleen Gondek; Pierre-Philippe Sagnier; Kim Gilchrist; J Michael Woolley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Prevalence and characteristics of moderate to severe fatigue: a multicenter study in cancer patients and survivors.

Authors:  Xin Shelley Wang; Fengmin Zhao; Michael J Fisch; Ann M O'Mara; David Cella; Tito R Mendoza; Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Setting standards for severity of common symptoms in oncology using the PROMIS item banks and expert judgment.

Authors:  David Cella; Seung Choi; Sofia Garcia; Karon F Cook; Sarah Rosenbloom; Jin-Shei Lai; Donna Surges Tatum; Richard Gershon
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  How generalizable are the SEER registries to the cancer populations of the USA?

Authors:  Tzy-Mey Kuo; Lee R Mobley
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 8.  Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Amy P Abernethy; C Daniel Mullins; Bryce B Reeve; Mary Lou Smith; Stephen Joel Coons; Jeff Sloan; Keith Wenzel; Cynthia Chauhan; Wayland Eppard; Elizabeth S Frank; Joseph Lipscomb; Stephen A Raymond; Merianne Spencer; Sean Tunis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  A gerontologic perspective on cancer and aging.

Authors:  Thomas O Blank; Keith M Bellizzi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Computer-based quality of life questionnaires may contribute to doctor-patient interactions in oncology.

Authors:  G Velikova; J M Brown; A B Smith; P J Selby
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  42 in total

1.  Factors affecting symptom presentation in an early-phase clinical trials clinic patient population.

Authors:  Goldy C George; Tito R Mendoza; Eucharia C Iwuanyanwu; Meryna Manandhar; Solmaz F Afshar; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Apostolia Tsimberidou; Aung Naing; Charles S Cleeland; David S Hong
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  Patient-Reported Outcomes with Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Rajshekhar Chakraborty; Surbhi Sidana; Gunjan L Shah; Michael Scordo; Betty K Hamilton; Navneet S Majhail
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Symptom Care at Home: A Comprehensive and Pragmatic PRO System Approach to Improve Cancer Symptom Care.

Authors:  Kathi Mooney; Meagan S Whisenant; Susan L Beck
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Testing Symptom Severity Thresholds and Potential Alerts for Clinical Intervention in Patients With Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Qiuling Shi; Ju-Whei Lee; Xin Shelley Wang; Michael J Fisch; Victor T Chang; Lynne Wagner; Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2020-05-05

5.  Relations of Mindfulness and Illness Acceptance With Psychosocial Functioning in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer and Caregivers.

Authors:  Kelly Chinh; Ekin Secinti; Shelley A Johns; Adam T Hirsh; Kathy D Miller; Bryan Schneider; Anna Maria Storniolo; Lida Mina; Erin V Newton; Victoria L Champion; Catherine E Mosher
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Patient-Reported Neuropsychiatric Outcomes of Long-Term Survivors after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy.

Authors:  Julia Ruark; Erin Mullane; Nancy Cleary; Ana Cordeiro; Evandro D Bezerra; Vicky Wu; Jenna Voutsinas; Bronwen E Shaw; Kathryn E Flynn; Stephanie J Lee; Cameron J Turtle; David G Maloney; Jesse R Fann; Merav Bar
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Protocol of a randomized trial of acceptance and commitment therapy for fatigue interference in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Catherine E Mosher; Ellen Krueger; Adam T Hirsh; Kathy D Miller; Tarah J Ballinger; Anna Maria Storniolo; Bryan P Schneider; Erin V Newton; Victoria L Champion; Shelley A Johns
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Validation of PROMIS emotional distress short form scales for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Justin Wilford; Kathryn Osann; Susie Hsieh; Bradley Monk; Edward Nelson; Lari Wenzel
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 9.  Utility of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) to measure primary health outcomes in cancer patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Thi Xuan Mai Tran; Jungeun Park; Joonki Lee; Yuh-Seog Jung; Yoonjung Chang; Hyunsoon Cho
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  A Systematic Literature Review and Head-to-Head Comparison of Social Support and Social Constraint in Relation to the Psychological Functioning of Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Jessica N Rivera Rivera; Jessica L Burris
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2020-02-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.