Literature DB >> 9505581

The Control Preferences Scale.

L F Degner1, J A Sloan, P Venkatesh.   

Abstract

The Control Preferences Scale (CPS) was developed to measure a construct that emerged from a grounded theory of how treatment decisions are made among people with life-threatening illnesses. The control preferences construct is defined as "the degree of control an individual wants to assume when decisions are being made about medical treatment." The CPS consists of five cards that each portrays a different role in treatment decision-making using a statement and a cartoon. These roles range from the individual making the treatment decisions, through the individual making the decisions jointly with the physician, to the physician making the decisions. The CPS involves subjects in making a series of paired comparisons to provide their total preference order over the five cards. These preference orders are analyzed using unfolding theory to determine the distribution of preferences in different populations and the effect of covariates on consumer preferences. The scale has been tested in a variety of populations, ranging from the general public to highly stressed groups. The CPS has proven to be a clinically relevant, easily administered, valid, and reliable measure of preferred roles in health-care decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9505581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Nurs Res        ISSN: 0844-5621


  396 in total

1.  Lethal Means Assessment and Counseling in the Emergency Department: Differences by Provider Type and Personal Home Firearms.

Authors:  Sofiya Diurba; Rachel L Johnson; Bonnie J Siry; Christopher E Knoepke; Krithika Suresh; Scott A Simpson; Deborah Azrael; Megan L Ranney; Garen J Wintemute; Marian E Betz
Journal:  Suicide Life Threat Behav       Date:  2020-06-29

2.  Medical tests: women's reported and preferred decision-making roles and preferences for information on benefits, side-effects and false results.

Authors:  Heather M Davey; Alexandra L Barratt; Elizabeth Davey; Phyllis N Butow; Sally Redman; Nehmat Houssami; Glenn P Salkeld
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Behind Closed Doors: What Happens when Patients and Providers Talk about Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening?: Survey of the Effects of a Community-Based Intervention.

Authors:  Lauren McCormack; Pamela Williams-Piehota; Carla Bann
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Does Feedback to Physicians of a Patient-Reported Readiness for Discharge Checklist Improve Discharge?

Authors:  James D Harrison; W John Boscardin; Judith Maselli; Andrew D Auerbach
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2020-01-12

5.  Patient activation increases colorectal cancer screening rates: a randomized trial among low-income minority patients.

Authors:  Mira L Katz; James L Fisher; Kelly Fleming; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Face-to-face vs. online peer support groups for prostate cancer: A cross-sectional comparison study.

Authors:  Johannes Huber; Tanja Muck; Philipp Maatz; Bastian Keck; Paul Enders; Imad Maatouk; Andreas Ihrig
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.442

7.  Characteristics Associated With Preferences for Parent-Centered Decision Making in Neonatal Intensive Care.

Authors:  Elliott Mark Weiss; Dawei Xie; Noah Cook; Katherine Coughlin; Steven Joffe
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 16.193

8.  Preferences for Shared Decision Making in Older Adult Patients With Orthopedic Hand Conditions.

Authors:  Agnes Z Dardas; Christopher Stockburger; Sean Boone; Tonya An; Ryan P Calfee
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  Participation preferences of patients with acute and chronic conditions.

Authors:  Johannes Hamann; Bruno Neuner; Jürgen Kasper; Andrea Vodermaier; Andreas Loh; Anja Deinzer; Christoph Heesen; Werner Kissling; Raymonde Busch; Roland Schmieder; Claudia Spies; Cornelia Caspari; Martin Härter
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 10.  Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument.

Authors:  Nicolas Couët; Sophie Desroches; Hubert Robitaille; Hugues Vaillancourt; Annie Leblanc; Stéphane Turcotte; Glyn Elwyn; France Légaré
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.