Literature DB >> 20507890

Gender-related needs and preferences in cancer care indicate the need for an individualized approach to cancer patients.

Hester Wessels1, Alexander de Graeff, Klaske Wynia, Miriam de Heus, Cas L J J Kruitwagen, Gerda T G J Woltjer, Saskia C C M Teunissen, Emile E Voest.   

Abstract

AIM: Improving quality of care for cancer patients requires insight into their specific wishes, needs, and preferences concerning cancer care. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of gender on cancer patients' needs and preferences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from 386 questionnaires assessing cancer patients' preferences for health care. Multivariate regression analyses were performed with data obtained from medical oncology patients treated in seven Dutch hospitals, using the scales of the questionnaire as dependent variables.
RESULTS: Patients rated safety, expertise, performance, and attitude of physicians and nurses highest on their list of preferences. There were significant differences between male and female patients concerning preferences in health care in 15 of the 21 scales and in two of the eight single items. Without exception, women found the care aspects mentioned in these scales and items more important than men. Multivariate regression analysis showed that, of all the patient- and disease-related factors, gender was the most important independent predictor of patient preferences.
CONCLUSION: Gender impacts cancer patients' needs and preferences and should be taken into account for optimal cancer care. Cancer care might be tailored toward gender, for example, with regard to the means and extent of communication, manner and extent of support, counseling and rehabilitation, consultation length, and physician assignment. The results of this study may guide health care professionals and organizations to develop a gender-specific health care approach to further improve cancer patient-centered care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20507890      PMCID: PMC3227987          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  31 in total

Review 1.  Quality of care and patient satisfaction: a review of measuring instruments.

Authors:  C van Campen; H Sixma; R D Friele; J J Kerssens; L Peters
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.929

2.  Gender differences in health related behaviour: some unanswered questions.

Authors:  M A Kandrack; K R Grant; A Segall
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Patient sociodemographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Hall; M C Dornan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Illness-related distress: does it mean the same for men and women? Gender aspects in cancer patients' distress and adjustment.

Authors:  M Keller; G Henrich
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.089

5.  Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts.

Authors:  J Sitzia; N Wood
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Cancer patient satisfaction with care.

Authors:  J H Wiggers; K O Donovan; S Redman; R W Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Medical oncology patients' preferences with regard to health care: development of a patient-driven questionnaire.

Authors:  H Wessels; A de Graeff; K Wynia; H J Sixma; M de Heus; M Schipper; G T G J Woltjer; S C C M Teunissen; E E Voest
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  A comprehensive assessment of satisfaction with care for cancer patients.

Authors:  A Brédart; D Razavi; N Delvaux; V Goodman; C Farvacques; C Van Heer
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Confiding in crisis: gender differences in pattern of confiding among cancer patients.

Authors:  J Harrison; P Maguire; C Pitceathly
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Cancer patients' needs during hospitalisation: a quantitative and qualitative study.

Authors:  Marcello Tamburini; Laura Gangeri; Cinzia Brunelli; Paolo Boeri; Claudia Borreani; Marco Bosisio; Claude Fusco Karmann; Margherita Greco; Guido Miccinesi; Luciana Murru; Patrizia Trimigno
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2003-04-23       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  21 in total

1.  What men want: Qualitative analysis of what men with prostate cancer (PCa) want to learn regarding genetic referral, counseling, and testing.

Authors:  Samantha Greenberg; Stacey Slager; Brock O' Neil; Kathleen Cooney; Benjamin Maughan; Nicole Stopa; Vickie Venne; Susan Zickmund; Sarah Colonna
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.104

2.  Importance of and Satisfaction with Psychosocial Support among Cancer Patients and Survivors in Puerto Rico: Gender, Health Status, and Quality of Life Associations.

Authors:  Eida M Castro; Gloria Asencio; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Thomas Brandon; Clement K Gwede; Susan Vadaparampil; Vani Simmons; Jessica McIntyre; Julio Jiménez
Journal:  P R Health Sci J       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.705

3.  Communication Efficacy and Couples' Cancer Management: Applying a Dyadic Appraisal Model.

Authors:  Kate Magsamen-Conrad; Maria G Checton; Maria K Venetis; Kathryn Greene
Journal:  Commun Monogr       Date:  2015-06-01

4.  "I pretty much followed the law, and there weren't any decisions to make": A qualitative study of self-advocacy experiences of men with cancer.

Authors:  Teresa Hagan Thomas; Makenna L Hadley; Marci Lee Nilsen
Journal:  Nurs Health Sci       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  Understanding racial-ethnic differences in patient-centered care (PCC) in oncology through a critical race theory lens: A qualitative comparison of PCC among Black, Hispanic, and White cancer patients.

Authors:  Kerri-Anne R Mitchell; Kelly J Brassil; Margaret L Osborne; Qian Lu; Richard F Brown
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2021-11-19

6.  Patients' characteristics informing practice: improving individualized nursing care in the radiation oncology setting.

Authors:  Pauline M Rose
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Are health care professionals able to judge cancer patients' health care preferences correctly? A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Hester Wessels; Alexander de Graeff; Klaske Wynia; Miriam de Heus; Cas L J J Kruitwagen; Saskia C C M Teunissen; Emile E Voest
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  The Female Self-Advocacy in Cancer Survivorship Scale: A validation study.

Authors:  Teresa L Hagan; Susan M Cohen; Margaret Q Rosenzweig; Kristin Zorn; Clement A Stone; Heidi S Donovan
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 9.  The validity of using analogue patients in practitioner-patient communication research: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liesbeth M van Vliet; Elsken van der Wall; Akke Albada; Peter M M Spreeuwenberg; William Verheul; Jozien M Bensing
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Participation in cancer rehabilitation and unmet needs: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Lise Vilstrup Holm; Dorte Gilså Hansen; Christoffer Johansen; Peter Vedsted; Pia Veldt Larsen; Jakob Kragstrup; Jens Søndergaard
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.