Literature DB >> 25083167

The recruitment of knowledge regarding plurality and compound formation during language comprehension.

Robert Fiorentino1, Jamie Bost1, Alyson D Abel2, Jordan Zuccarelli2.   

Abstract

Compound formation has been a major focus of research and debate in mental lexicon research. In particular, it has been widely observed that compounds with a regular plural non-head are dispreferred, and a long line of research has examined the nature of this constraint, including which morphological, semantic or phonological properties of the non-head underlie this dispreference. While it is typically assumed that this constraint in fact leads to the barring of a compound analysis to a noun-noun string which would otherwise violate the constraint, its implementation during sentence comprehension has not been thoroughly examined. Using self-paced reading, we demonstrate that knowledge of pluralization and compound formation is immediately utilized in the assignment of structure to noun-noun strings, and that the dispreference for regular plural non-heads in fact leads the parser away from the compound analysis in favor of a more complex grammatical alternative. These results provide new evidence for the online deployment of knowledge regarding pluralization and its interaction with compound formation, and inform our understanding of how morphological information is deployed during, and impacts real-time sentence comprehension.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ambiguity; compounding; inflection; morphological constraints; parsing

Year:  2012        PMID: 25083167      PMCID: PMC4114514          DOI: 10.1075/ml.7.1.02fio

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ment Lex        ISSN: 1871-1340


  20 in total

1.  Level-ordering does not constrain children's ungrammatical compounds.

Authors:  Elena Nicoladis; Victoria A Murphy
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Learning language from the input: why innate constraints can't explain noun compounding.

Authors:  Michael Ramscar; Melody Dye
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Different time courses of integrative semantic processing for plural and singular nouns: implications for theories of sentence processing.

Authors:  Shelia M Kennison
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-12-30

4.  The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis.

Authors:  Ellen Lau; Clare Stroud; Silke Plesch; Colin Phillips
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 5.  Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies.

Authors:  E Gibson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-08

6.  The time-course of morphological constraints: evidence from eye-movements during reading.

Authors:  Ian Cunnings; Harald Clahsen
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2006-08-28

7.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference.

Authors:  G T Altmann; Y Kamide
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-12-17

Review 8.  The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: a model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data.

Authors:  A D Friederici
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Red rats eater exposes recursion in children's word formation.

Authors:  M A Alegre; P Gordon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1996-07

10.  Language learning and innateness: some implications of Compounds Research.

Authors:  Todd R Haskell; Maryellen C MacDonald; Mark S Seidenberg
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.