Literature DB >> 17977819

Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study.

José Villar1, Guillermo Carroli, Nelly Zavaleta, Allan Donner, Daniel Wojdyla, Anibal Faundes, Alejandro Velazco, Vicente Bataglia, Ana Langer, Alberto Narváez, Eliette Valladares, Archana Shah, Liana Campodónico, Mariana Romero, Sofia Reynoso, Karla Simônia de Pádua, Daniel Giordano, Marius Kublickas, Arnaldo Acosta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery compared with vaginal delivery.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study within the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health.
SETTING: 410 health facilities in 24 areas in eight randomly selected Latin American countries; 123 were randomly selected and 120 participated and provided data PARTICIPANTS: 106,546 deliveries reported during the three month study period, with data available for 97,095 (91% coverage). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maternal, fetal, and neonatal morbidity and mortality associated with intrapartum or elective caesarean delivery, adjusted for clinical, demographic, pregnancy, and institutional characteristics.
RESULTS: Women undergoing caesarean delivery had an increased risk of severe maternal morbidity compared with women undergoing vaginal delivery (odds ratio 2.0 (95% confidence interval 1.6 to 2.5) for intrapartum caesarean and 2.3 (1.7 to 3.1) for elective caesarean). The risk of antibiotic treatment after delivery for women having either type of caesarean was five times that of women having vaginal deliveries. With cephalic presentation, there was a trend towards a reduced odds ratio for fetal death with elective caesarean, after adjustment for possible confounding variables and gestational age (0.7, 0.4 to 1.0). With breech presentation, caesarean delivery had a large protective effect for fetal death. With cephalic presentation, however, independent of possible confounding variables and gestational age, intrapartum and elective caesarean increased the risk for a stay of seven or more days in neonatal intensive care (2.1 (1.8 to 2.6) and 1.9 (1.6 to 2.3), respectively) and the risk of neonatal mortality up to hospital discharge (1.7 (1.3 to 2.2) and 1.9 (1.5 to 2.6), respectively), which remained higher even after exclusion of all caesarean deliveries for fetal distress. Such increased risk was not seen for breech presentation. Lack of labour was a risk factor for a stay of seven or more days in neonatal intensive care and neonatal mortality up to hospital discharge for babies delivered by elective caesarean delivery, but rupturing of membranes may be protective.
CONCLUSIONS: Caesarean delivery independently reduces overall risk in breech presentations and risk of intrapartum fetal death in cephalic presentations but increases the risk of severe maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality in cephalic presentations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17977819      PMCID: PMC2078636          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39363.706956.55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  17 in total

1.  Mandatory second opinion to reduce rates of unnecessary caesarean sections in Latin America: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Fernando Althabe; José M Belizán; José Villar; Sophie Alexander; Eduardo Bergel; Silvina Ramos; Mariana Romero; Allan Donner; Gunilla Lindmark; Ana Langer; Ubaldo Farnot; José G Cecatti; Guillermo Carroli; Edgar Kestler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-06-12       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Could a randomised trial answer the controversy relating to elective caesarean section? National survey of consultant obstetricians and heads of midwifery.

Authors:  Tina Lavender; Carol Kingdon; Anna Hart; Gill Gyte; Mark Gabbay; James P Neilson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-08-22

3.  Maternal outcomes associated with planned primary cesarean births compared with planned vaginal births.

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Mary Barger; Howard J Cabral; Stephen R Evans; Milton Kotelchuck; Carol Simon; Judith Weiss; Linda J Heffner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Annual summary of vital statistics: 2005.

Authors:  Brady E Hamilton; Arialdi M Miniño; Joyce A Martin; Kenneth D Kochanek; Donna M Strobino; Bernard Guyer
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  The effect of pregnancy and mode of delivery on the prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Vikki McKinnie; Steven E Swift; Wei Wang; Patrick Woodman; Amy O'Boyle; Margie Kahn; Michael Valley; Deirdre Bland; Joe Schaffer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Caesarean section on demand: influence of personal birth experience and working environment on attitude of German gynaecologists.

Authors:  Patricia Faas-Fehervary; Kai Schwarz; Lelia Bauer; Frank Melchert
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group.

Authors:  M E Hannah; W J Hannah; S A Hewson; E D Hodnett; S Saigal; A R Willan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-10-21       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Decision making about mode of delivery among pregnant women who have previously had a caesarean section: A qualitative study.

Authors:  M A Moffat; J S Bell; M A Porter; S Lawton; V Hundley; P Danielian; S Bhattacharya
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Intrapartum elective cesarean delivery: a previously unrecognized clinical entity.

Authors:  Robin B Kalish; Laurence McCullough; Meruka Gupta; Howard T Thaler; Frank A Chervenak
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 10.  Ethical dimensions of elective primary cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Howard Minkoff; Kathleen R Powderly; Frank Chervenak; Lawrence B McCullough
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  156 in total

1.  Time trends and regional differences in maternal mortality in China from 2000 to 2005.

Authors:  Gao Yanqiu; Carine Ronsmans; An Lin
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Recent trends in maternal, newborn, and child health in Brazil: progress toward Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5.

Authors:  Fernando C Barros; Alicia Matijasevich; Jennifer Harris Requejo; Elsa Giugliani; Ana Goretti Maranhão; Carlos A Monteiro; Aluísio J D Barros; Flavia Bustreo; Mario Merialdi; Cesar G Victora
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Impact of Anesthetic Predictors on Postpartum Hospital Length of Stay and Adverse Events Following Cesarean Delivery: A Retrospective Study in 840 Consecutive Parturients.

Authors:  Ting Ting Oh; Colleen G Martel; Allison G Clark; Melissa B Russo; Bobby D Nossaman
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2015

4.  Planned Cesarean Delivery at Term and Adverse Outcomes in Childhood Health.

Authors:  Mairead Black; Siladitya Bhattacharya; Sam Philip; Jane E Norman; David J McLernon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Maternal and neonatal effects of caesarean section.

Authors:  Allison Shorten
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-10-30

6.  Caesarean section: Points raised in responses.

Authors:  Sharon Davies
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-12-15

7.  Trends in caesarean delivery by country and wealth quintile: cross-sectional surveys in southern Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Francesca L Cavallaro; Jenny A Cresswell; Giovanny Va França; Cesar G Victora; Aluísio Jd Barros; Carine Ronsmans
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 9.408

8.  Quality of life after cesarean and vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Seyed Abbas Mousavi; Forough Mortazavi; Reza Chaman; Ahmad Khosravi
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2013-07

Review 9.  Support for mothers, fathers and families after perinatal death.

Authors:  Laura Koopmans; Trish Wilson; Joanne Cacciatore; Vicki Flenady
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-19

Review 10.  Elective cesarean section: its impact on neonatal respiratory outcome.

Authors:  Ashwin Ramachandrappa; Lucky Jain
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.