Literature DB >> 15172844

Intrapartum elective cesarean delivery: a previously unrecognized clinical entity.

Robin B Kalish1, Laurence McCullough, Meruka Gupta, Howard T Thaler, Frank A Chervenak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the incidence of intrapartum patient choice cesarean delivery-patients' requesting cesarean delivery and physicians' offering it during labor-and factors possibly influencing these requests and offers.
METHODS: For a 6-month period from May 1, 2002, to October 31, 2002, obstetricians were asked to complete a questionnaire after all intrapartum cesarean deliveries regarding whether cesarean delivery was offered by the obstetrician or requested by the patient before being medically indicated. Patient medical records and physician demographic information were reviewed.
RESULTS: There were 422 cases that met inclusion criteria. Questionnaires were completed in 100% of cases. Cesarean delivery was offered in 13% before a clear medical indication and requested in 8.8%. Older obstetricians, maternal-fetal medicine specialists, and full-time faculty were significantly more likely to offer cesarean delivery (P =.009, P <.001, and P =.015, respectively). Patients who were unmarried or undergoing labor induction were less likely to request cesarean delivery (P =.029 and P =.035, respectively). Maternal age, parity, stage or length of labor, epidural use, gestational age, insurance status, day of week, and time of delivery did not affect whether patients requested or were offered cesarean delivery.
CONCLUSION: This study documents a heretofore unrecognized clinical entity: intrapartum elective cesarean delivery. Physician characteristics, as opposed to patient characteristics or intrapartum factors, are a major determinant of whether laboring patients are being offered cesarean delivery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15172844     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000128118.37737.df

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  10 in total

1.  Cruelty in maternity wards: fifty years later.

Authors:  Henci Goer
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2010

2.  Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; James Troendle; Uma M Reddy; S Katherine Laughon; D Ware Branch; Ronald Burkman; Helain J Landy; Judith U Hibbard; Shoshana Haberman; Mildred M Ramirez; Jennifer L Bailit; Matthew K Hoffman; Kimberly D Gregory; Victor H Gonzalez-Quintero; Michelle Kominiarek; Lee A Learman; Christos G Hatjis; Paul van Veldhuisen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  The cesarean catastrophe.

Authors:  Judith A Lothian
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2006

4.  Recovery after caesarean birth: a qualitative study of women's accounts in Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  Michelle A Kealy; Rhonda E Small; Pranee Liamputtong
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Determinants of cesarean delivery in the US: a lifecourse approach.

Authors:  Whitney P Witt; Lauren E Wisk; Erika R Cheng; Kara Mandell; Debanjana Chatterjee; Fathima Wakeel; Amy L Godecker; Dakota Zarak
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-01

6.  Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study.

Authors:  José Villar; Guillermo Carroli; Nelly Zavaleta; Allan Donner; Daniel Wojdyla; Anibal Faundes; Alejandro Velazco; Vicente Bataglia; Ana Langer; Alberto Narváez; Eliette Valladares; Archana Shah; Liana Campodónico; Mariana Romero; Sofia Reynoso; Karla Simônia de Pádua; Daniel Giordano; Marius Kublickas; Arnaldo Acosta
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-10-30

7.  Strength of preference for vaginal birth as a predictor of delivery mode among women who attempt a vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Erica Wu; Anjali J Kaimal; Kathryn Houston; Lynn M Yee; Sanae Nakagawa; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Portrayal of caesarean section in Brazilian women's magazines: 20 year review.

Authors:  Maria Regina Torloni; Silvia Daher; Ana Pilar Betrán; Mariana Widmer; Pilar Montilla; Joao Paulo Souza; Mario Merialdi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-01-25

9.  Birth in Brazil: national survey into labour and birth.

Authors:  Maria do Carmo Leal; Antônio Augusto Moura da Silva; Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias; Silvana Granado Nogueira da Gama; Daphne Rattner; Maria Elizabeth Moreira; Mariza Miranda Theme Filha; Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues; Ana Paula Esteves Pereira; Jacqueline Alves Torres; Sonia Duarte Azevedo Bittencourt; Eleonora D'orsi; Antonio Jla Cunha; Alvaro Jorge Madeiro Leite; Rejane Silva Cavalcante; Sonia Lansky; Carmem Simone Grilo Diniz; Célia Landmann Szwarcwald
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 10.  What do popular Spanish women's magazines say about caesarean section? A 21-year survey.

Authors:  M R Torloni; B Campos Mansilla; M Merialdi; A P Betrán
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 6.531

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.