Literature DB >> 11052579

Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group.

M E Hannah1, W J Hannah, S A Hewson, E D Hodnett, S Saigal, A R Willan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For 3-4% of pregnancies, the fetus will be in the breech presentation at term. For most of these women, the approach to delivery is controversial. We did a randomised trial to compare a policy of planned caesarean section with a policy of planned vaginal birth for selected breech-presentation pregnancies.
METHODS: At 121 centres in 26 countries, 2088 women with a singleton fetus in a frank or complete breech presentation were randomly assigned planned caesarean section or planned vaginal birth. Women having a vaginal breech delivery had an experienced clinician at the birth. Mothers and infants were followed-up to 6 weeks post partum. The primary outcomes were perinatal mortality, neonatal mortality, or serious neonatal morbidity; and maternal mortality or serious maternal morbidity. Analysis was by intention to treat.
FINDINGS: Data were received for 2083 women. Of the 1041 women assigned planned caesarean section, 941 (90.4%) were delivered by caesarean section. Of the 1042 women assigned planned vaginal birth, 591 (56.7%) delivered vaginally. Perinatal mortality, neonatal mortality, or serious neonatal morbidity was significantly lower for the planned caesarean section group than for the planned vaginal birth group (17 of 1039 [1.6%] vs 52 of 1039 [5.0%]; relative risk 0.33 [95% CI 0.19-0.56]; p<0.0001). There were no differences between groups in terms of maternal mortality or serious maternal morbidity (41 of 1041 [3.9%] vs 33 of 1042 [3.2%]; 1.24 [0.79-1.95]; p=0.35).
INTERPRETATION: Planned caesarean section is better than planned vaginal birth for the term fetus in the breech presentation; serious maternal complications are similar between the groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11052579     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02840-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  191 in total

Review 1.  Informed consent for obstetrics management: a urogynecologic perspective.

Authors:  G W Davila
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2001

2.  Managing term breech deliveries. External cephalic version should be routine clinical practice in UK.

Authors:  Rajesh Varma; David Horwell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-01-05

3.  Perinatal risk factors for major intraventricular haemorrhage in the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network, 1995-97.

Authors:  A M Heuchan; N Evans; D J Henderson Smart; J M Simpson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Delivery by caesarean section. Increased numbers of caesareans do not match diagnoses of fetal distress.

Authors:  A Banerjee; J Hollinshead; E Williams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-20

5.  How to manage term breech deliveries.

Authors:  A Shennan; S Bewley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-04

6.  Continuous fetal heart rate monitoring.

Authors:  I Chalmers
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 7.  Recent developments in obstetrics.

Authors:  Andrew H Shennan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-13

8.  Elective cesarean section.

Authors:  Michael C Klein
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Making sense of rising caesarean section rates.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Anderson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-09-25

10.  Planned elective cesarean section: a reasonable choice for some women?

Authors:  Mary E Hannah
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-03-02       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.