Literature DB >> 17233863

Decision making about mode of delivery among pregnant women who have previously had a caesarean section: A qualitative study.

M A Moffat1, J S Bell, M A Porter, S Lawton, V Hundley, P Danielian, S Bhattacharya.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore prospectively women's decision making regarding mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The evolution of decision making, women's participation in decision making, and factors affecting decision making. DESIGN AND METHODS: A qualitative study using diaries, observations and semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed thematically from both a longitudinal and a cross-sectional perspective.
SETTING: An antenatal unit in a large teaching hospital in Scotland and participants' homes. SAMPLE: Twenty-six women who had previously had a caesarean section for a nonrecurrent cause.
RESULTS: Women were influenced by their own previous experiences and expectations, and the final decision on mode of delivery often developed during the course of the pregnancy. Most acknowledged that any decision was provisional and might change if circumstances necessitated. Despite a universal desire to be involved in the process, many women did not participate actively and were uncomfortable with having responsibility for decision making. Feelings about the amount and quality of the information received regarding delivery options varied greatly, with many women wishing for information to be tailored to their individual clinical circumstances and needs. In contrast to the impression created in the media, there was no evidence of clear preferences or strong demands for elective caesarean section.
CONCLUSION: Women who have had a previous caesarean section do not usually have firm ideas about mode of delivery. They look for targeted information and guidance from medical personnel based on their individual circumstances, and some are unhappy with the responsibility of deciding how to deliver in the current pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17233863     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01154.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  26 in total

1.  Speaking out! Qualitative insights on the experience of mothers who wanted a vaginal birth after a birth by cesarean section.

Authors:  Pam McGrath; Emma Phillips; Grahame Vaughan
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Experience of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: A Phenomenological Study.

Authors:  Silvio Simeone; Filomena Stile; Guillari Assunta; Gianpaolo Gargiulo; Teresa Rea
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2019-07-01

3.  Patient-Perceived Pressure from Clinicians for Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery: A Population-Based Survey of U.S. Women.

Authors:  Judy Jou; Katy B Kozhimannil; Pamela Jo Johnson; Carol Sakala
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Women's Preferences Regarding the Processes and Outcomes of Trial of Labor After Cesarean and Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Anjali J Kaimal; William A Grobman; Allison S Bryant; Laura Norrell; Yamilee Bermingham; Anna Altshuler; Mari-Paule Thiet; Juan Gonzalez; Peter Bacchetti; Michelle Moghadassi; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Preferences for mode of delivery after previous caesarean section: what do women want, what do they get and how do they value outcomes?

Authors:  Clare L Emmett; Alan A Montgomery; Deirdre J Murphy
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Mode of delivery preferences in a diverse population of pregnant women.

Authors:  Lynn M Yee; Anjali J Kaimal; Kathryn A Houston; Erica Wu; Mari-Paule Thiet; Sanae Nakagawa; Aaron B Caughey; Atoosa Firouzian; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study.

Authors:  José Villar; Guillermo Carroli; Nelly Zavaleta; Allan Donner; Daniel Wojdyla; Anibal Faundes; Alejandro Velazco; Vicente Bataglia; Ana Langer; Alberto Narváez; Eliette Valladares; Archana Shah; Liana Campodónico; Mariana Romero; Sofia Reynoso; Karla Simônia de Pádua; Daniel Giordano; Marius Kublickas; Arnaldo Acosta
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-10-30

8.  Strength of preference for vaginal birth as a predictor of delivery mode among women who attempt a vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Erica Wu; Anjali J Kaimal; Kathryn Houston; Lynn M Yee; Sanae Nakagawa; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Hospital bans on trial of labor after cesarean and antepartum transfer of care.

Authors:  Melissa G Rosenstein; Laura Norrell; Anna Altshuler; William A Grobman; Anjali J Kaimal; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.081

10.  'Groping through the fog': a metasynthesis of women's experiences on VBAC (Vaginal birth after Caesarean section).

Authors:  Ingela Lundgren; Cecily Begley; Mechthild M Gross; Terese Bondas
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.