Literature DB >> 16219516

Caesarean section on demand: influence of personal birth experience and working environment on attitude of German gynaecologists.

Patricia Faas-Fehervary1, Kai Schwarz, Lelia Bauer, Frank Melchert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We performed a survey among German obstetricians and gynecologists in order to evaluate the influence of biographic data, working environment and personal birth experience on the attitude towards Cesarean Section on demand.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: All 2106 board-certified gynecologists in Baden-Württemberg received an anonymous questionnaire in 2002-2003 concerning attitude towards C-section on demand, biographical data, personal birth experience and working environment. Seven hundred and nineteen questionnaires were returned and entered into statistical analysis.
RESULTS: General approval of C-section was in 59% of all participants, with huge statistically significant variations according to age, personal birth experience and working field. When asked for their preferred way of delivery for themselves or their partner after a low-risk pregnancy, 90% of the responding gynecologists opted for vaginal delivery. The approval depended statistically significant on parenthood, personal birth experience and working environment.
CONCLUSIONS: Biographical data, personal birth experience and working environment influence the attitude towards elective Cesaran section. Although 90% would chose vaginal delivery for themselves or their partner as best medical practice, 59% of the physicians approve of the general opportunity of C-section on demand. This shows, that not only best medical practice, but also patient autonomy and forensic aspects seem to play an important role.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16219516     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  5 in total

1.  Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study.

Authors:  José Villar; Guillermo Carroli; Nelly Zavaleta; Allan Donner; Daniel Wojdyla; Anibal Faundes; Alejandro Velazco; Vicente Bataglia; Ana Langer; Alberto Narváez; Eliette Valladares; Archana Shah; Liana Campodónico; Mariana Romero; Sofia Reynoso; Karla Simônia de Pádua; Daniel Giordano; Marius Kublickas; Arnaldo Acosta
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-10-30

2.  Obstetrical providers' preferred mode of delivery and attitude towards non-medically indicated caesarean sections: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  J C Rivo; M Amyx; V Pingray; R A Casale; A E Fiorillo; H B Krupitzki; J D Malamud; M Mendilaharzu; M L Medina; A B Del Pino; L Ribola; J A Schvartzman; G M Tartalo; M Trasmonte; S Varela; F Althabe; J M Belizán
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  Clinicians' views of factors influencing decision-making for caesarean section: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies.

Authors:  Sunita Panda; Cecily Begley; Deirdre Daly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Recent Lifestyle Parameters Are Associated with Increasing Caesarean Section Rates among Singleton Term Births in Austria.

Authors:  Sylvia Kirchengast; Beda Hartmann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Shared decision-making in maternity care: Acknowledging and overcoming epistemic defeaters.

Authors:  Keith Begley; Deirdre Daly; Sunita Panda; Cecily Begley
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 2.431

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.