Literature DB >> 10989404

Improving residents' compliance with standards of ambulatory care: results from the VA Cooperative Study on Computerized Reminders.

J G Demakis1, C Beauchamp, W L Cull, R Denwood, S A Eisen, R Lofgren, K Nichol, J Woolliscroft, W G Henderson.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Computerized systems to remind physicians to provide appropriate care have not been widely evaluated in large numbers of patients in multiple clinical settings.
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether a computerized reminder system operating in multiple Veterans Affairs (VA) ambulatory care clinics improves resident physician compliance with standards of ambulatory care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 275 resident physicians at 12 VA medical centers were randomly assigned in firms or half-day clinic blocks to either a reminder group (n = 132) or a control group (n = 143). During a 17-month study period (January 31, 1995-June 30, 1996), the residents cared for 12,989 unique patients for whom at least 1 of the studied standards of care (SOC) was applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Compliance with 13 SOC, tracked using hospital databases and encounter forms completed by residents, compared between residents in the reminder group vs those in the control group.
RESULTS: Measuring compliance as the proportion of patients in compliance with all applicable SOC by their last visit during the study period, the reminder group had statistically significantly higher rates of compliance than the control group for all standards combined (58.8% vs 53.5%; odds ratio [OR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.42; P =.002) and for 5 of the 13 standards examined individually. Measuring compliance as the proportion of all visits for which care was indicated in which residents provided proper care, the reminder group also had statistically significantly higher rates of compliance than the control group for all standards combined (17.9% vs 12.2%; OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.45-1.71; P<.001) and for 9 of the 13 standards examined individually. The benefit of reminders, however, declined throughout the course of the study, even though the reminders remained active.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that reminder systems installed at multiple sites can improve residents' compliance to multiple SOC. The benefits of such systems, however, appear to deteriorate over time. Future research needs to explore methods to better sustain the benefits of reminders. JAMA. 2000;284:1411-1416.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10989404     DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.11.1411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  71 in total

1.  Does national regulatory mandate of provider order entry portend greater benefit than risk for health care delivery? The 2001 ACMI debate. The American College of Medical Informatics.

Authors:  J Marc Overhage; Blackford Middleton; Randolph A Miller; Rita D Zielstorff; William R Hersh
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Subjective assessment of usefulness and appropriate presentation mode of alerts and reminders in the outpatient setting.

Authors:  M A Krall; D F Sittig
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

3.  Detecting pregnancy use of non-hormonal category X medications in electronic medical records.

Authors:  Brian L Strom; Rita Schinnar; Joshua Jones; Warren B Bilker; Mark G Weiner; Sean Hennessy; Charles E Leonard; Peter F Cronholm; Eric Pifer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Understanding and modifying physician behavior for prevention and management of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Paul A Heidenreich
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Defining core issues in utilizing information technology to improve access: evaluation and research agenda.

Authors:  George L Jackson; Sarah L Krein; Dale C Alverson; Adam W Darkins; William Gunnar; Nancy D Harada; Christian D Helfrich; Thomas K Houston; Thomas F Klobucar; Kim M Nazi; Ronald K Poropatich; James D Ralston; Hayden B Bosworth
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Informatics systems to promote improved care for chronic illness: a literature review.

Authors:  David Dorr; Laura M Bonner; Amy N Cohen; Rebecca S Shoai; Ruth Perrin; Edmund Chaney; Alexander S Young
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Toward an effective strategy for the diffusion and use of clinical information systems.

Authors:  Stephen M Davidson; Janelle Heineke
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  An electronic prompt in dispensing software to promote clinical interventions by community pharmacists: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  James F Reeve; Peter C Tenni; Gregory M Peterson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Enhancing support via interactive technologies.

Authors:  John D Piette
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.810

10.  A trial of education, prompts, and opinion leaders to improve prescription of lipid modifying therapy by primary care physicians for patients with ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  H E Bloomfield; D B Nelson; M van Ryn; B J Neil; N J Koets; J N Basile; F F Samaha; R Kaul; J L Mehta; D Bouland
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.