Jacqueline R Halladay1, Darren A DeWalt, Alison Wise, Bahjat Qaqish, Kristin Reiter, Shoou-Yih Lee, Ann Lefebvre, Kimberly Ward, C Madeline Mitchell, Katrina E Donahue. 1. the Department of Family Medicine and the Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, and the Departments of Biostatistics and Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; the Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor; and the North Carolina Area Health Education Centers, Chapel Hill.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Chronic disease collaboratives help practices redesign care delivery. The North Carolina Improving Performance in Practice program provides coaches to guide implementation of 4 key practice changes: registries, planned care templates, protocols, and self-management support. Coaches rate progress using the Key Drivers Implementation Scales (KDIS). This study examines whether higher KDIS scores are associated with improved diabetes outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed clinical and KDIS data from 42 practices. We modeled whether higher implementation scores at year 1 of participation were associated with improved diabetes measures during year 2. Improvement was defined as an increase in the proportion of patients with hemoglobin A1C values <9%, blood pressure values <130/80 mmHg, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels <100 mg/dL. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements in the proportion of patients who met the LDL threshold were noted with higher "registry" and "protocol" KDIS scores. For hemoglobin A1C and blood pressure values, none of the odds ratios were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Practices that implement key changes may achieve improved patient outcomes in LDL control among their patients with diabetes. Our data confirm the importance of registry implementation and protocol use as key elements of improving patient care. The KDIS tool is a pragmatic option for measuring practice changes that are rooted in the Chronic Care Model.
OBJECTIVE:Chronic disease collaboratives help practices redesign care delivery. The North Carolina Improving Performance in Practice program provides coaches to guide implementation of 4 key practice changes: registries, planned care templates, protocols, and self-management support. Coaches rate progress using the Key Drivers Implementation Scales (KDIS). This study examines whether higher KDIS scores are associated with improved diabetes outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed clinical and KDIS data from 42 practices. We modeled whether higher implementation scores at year 1 of participation were associated with improved diabetes measures during year 2. Improvement was defined as an increase in the proportion of patients with hemoglobin A1C values <9%, blood pressure values <130/80 mmHg, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels <100 mg/dL. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements in the proportion of patients who met the LDL threshold were noted with higher "registry" and "protocol" KDIS scores. For hemoglobin A1C and blood pressure values, none of the odds ratios were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Practices that implement key changes may achieve improved patient outcomes in LDL control among their patients with diabetes. Our data confirm the importance of registry implementation and protocol use as key elements of improving patient care. The KDIS tool is a pragmatic option for measuring practice changes that are rooted in the Chronic Care Model.
Entities:
Keywords:
Chronic Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Primary Health Care; Quality Improvement
Authors: Donna M Daniel; Jan Norman; Connie Davis; Helan Lee; Michael F Hindmarsh; David K McCulloch; Edward H Wagner; Jonathan R Sugarman Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Saf Date: 2004-02
Authors: Marjorie L Pearson; Shinyi Wu; Judith Schaefer; Amy E Bonomi; Stephen M Shortell; Peter J Mendel; Jill A Marsteller; Thomas A Louis; Mayde Rosen; Emmett B Keeler Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Bruce E Landon; LeRoi S Hicks; A James O'Malley; Tracy A Lieu; Thomas Keegan; Barbara J McNeil; Edward Guadagnoli Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-03-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kris G Thomas; Matthew R Thomas; Robert J Stroebel; Furman S McDonald; Gregory J Hanson; James M Naessens; Todd R Huschka; Joseph C Kolars Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-11-01 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Marshall H Chin; Sandy Cook; Melinda L Drum; Lei Jin; Myriam Guillen; Catherine A Humikowski; Julie Koppert; James F Harrison; Susan Lippold; Cynthia T Schaefer Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Jacqueline R Halladay; Kathleen Mottus; Kristin Reiter; C Madeline Mitchell; Katrina E Donahue; Wilson M Gabbard; Kimberly Gush Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2016 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Ashley N Saucier; Benjamin Ansa; Janis Coffin; Mariam Akhtar; Andre Miller; Holly Mahoney; Denise M Hodo; Carla Duffie; Brittney Fontenot; Holly E Andrews; Selina A Smith Journal: Eur J Pers Cent Healthc Date: 2017
Authors: Delphine S Tuot; Charles E McCulloch; Alexandra Velasquez; Dean Schillinger; Chi-Yuan Hsu; Margaret Handley; Neil R Powe Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Kamal H Henderson; Darren A DeWalt; Jacquie Halladay; Bryan J Weiner; Jung I Kim; Jason Fine; Samuel Cykert Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Leif I Solberg; Kevin A Peterson; Helen Fu; Milton Eder; Rachel Jacobsen; Caroline S Carlin Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2021 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.707
Authors: Viviane F A Van Casteren; Nathalie H E Bossuyt; Sarah J S Moreels; Geert Goderis; Katrien Vanthomme; Johan Wens; Etienne W De Clercq Journal: Arch Public Health Date: 2015-07-13
Authors: Judith M Katzenellenbogen; Anna P Ralph; Rosemary Wyber; Jonathan R Carapetis Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Delphine S Tuot; Alexandra Velasquez; Charles E McCulloch; Tanushree Banerjee; Yunnuo Zhu; Chi-yuan Hsu; Margaret Handley; Dean Schillinger; Neil R Powe Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Bryan J Weiner; Michael P Pignone; C Annette DuBard; Ann Lefebvre; Janet L Suttie; Janet K Freburger; Samuel Cykert Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2015-11-14 Impact factor: 7.327