Literature DB >> 24390884

More extensive implementation of the chronic care model is associated with better lipid control in diabetes.

Jacqueline R Halladay1, Darren A DeWalt, Alison Wise, Bahjat Qaqish, Kristin Reiter, Shoou-Yih Lee, Ann Lefebvre, Kimberly Ward, C Madeline Mitchell, Katrina E Donahue.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Chronic disease collaboratives help practices redesign care delivery. The North Carolina Improving Performance in Practice program provides coaches to guide implementation of 4 key practice changes: registries, planned care templates, protocols, and self-management support. Coaches rate progress using the Key Drivers Implementation Scales (KDIS). This study examines whether higher KDIS scores are associated with improved diabetes outcomes.
METHODS: We analyzed clinical and KDIS data from 42 practices. We modeled whether higher implementation scores at year 1 of participation were associated with improved diabetes measures during year 2. Improvement was defined as an increase in the proportion of patients with hemoglobin A1C values <9%, blood pressure values <130/80 mmHg, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels <100 mg/dL.
RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements in the proportion of patients who met the LDL threshold were noted with higher "registry" and "protocol" KDIS scores. For hemoglobin A1C and blood pressure values, none of the odds ratios were statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Practices that implement key changes may achieve improved patient outcomes in LDL control among their patients with diabetes. Our data confirm the importance of registry implementation and protocol use as key elements of improving patient care. The KDIS tool is a pragmatic option for measuring practice changes that are rooted in the Chronic Care Model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Primary Health Care; Quality Improvement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24390884      PMCID: PMC4096824          DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.01.130070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  22 in total

1.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

2.  Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness.

Authors:  Thomas Bodenheimer; Edward H Wagner; Kevin Grumbach
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-10-09       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  A state-level application of the chronic illness breakthrough series: results from two collaboratives on diabetes in Washington State.

Authors:  Donna M Daniel; Jan Norman; Connie Davis; Helan Lee; Michael F Hindmarsh; David K McCulloch; Edward H Wagner; Jonathan R Sugarman
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Saf       Date:  2004-02

4.  Assessing the implementation of the chronic care model in quality improvement collaboratives.

Authors:  Marjorie L Pearson; Shinyi Wu; Judith Schaefer; Amy E Bonomi; Stephen M Shortell; Peter J Mendel; Jill A Marsteller; Thomas A Louis; Mayde Rosen; Emmett B Keeler
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Improving care through collaboration.

Authors:  C M Kilo
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Improving the management of chronic disease at community health centers.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon; LeRoi S Hicks; A James O'Malley; Tracy A Lieu; Thomas Keegan; Barbara J McNeil; Edward Guadagnoli
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Organizing care for patients with chronic illness.

Authors:  E H Wagner; B T Austin; M Von Korff
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.911

8.  An evaluation of collaborative interventions to improve chronic illness care. Framework and study design.

Authors:  Shan Cretin; Stephen M Shortell; Emmett B Keeler
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2004-02

9.  Use of a registry-generated audit, feedback, and patient reminder intervention in an internal medicine resident clinic--a randomized trial.

Authors:  Kris G Thomas; Matthew R Thomas; Robert J Stroebel; Furman S McDonald; Gregory J Hanson; James M Naessens; Todd R Huschka; Joseph C Kolars
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Improving diabetes care in midwest community health centers with the health disparities collaborative.

Authors:  Marshall H Chin; Sandy Cook; Melinda L Drum; Lei Jin; Myriam Guillen; Catherine A Humikowski; Julie Koppert; James F Harrison; Susan Lippold; Cynthia T Schaefer
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  15 in total

1.  The Cost to Successfully Apply for Level 3 Medical Home Recognition.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Halladay; Kathleen Mottus; Kristin Reiter; C Madeline Mitchell; Katrina E Donahue; Wilson M Gabbard; Kimberly Gush
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

2.  Patient perspectives of an individualized diabetes care management plan.

Authors:  Ashley N Saucier; Benjamin Ansa; Janis Coffin; Mariam Akhtar; Andre Miller; Holly Mahoney; Denise M Hodo; Carla Duffie; Brittney Fontenot; Holly E Andrews; Selina A Smith
Journal:  Eur J Pers Cent Healthc       Date:  2017

3.  Impact of a Primary Care CKD Registry in a US Public Safety-Net Health Care Delivery System: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Delphine S Tuot; Charles E McCulloch; Alexandra Velasquez; Dean Schillinger; Chi-Yuan Hsu; Margaret Handley; Neil R Powe
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 8.860

4.  Organizational Leadership and Adaptive Reserve in Blood Pressure Control: The Heart Health NOW Study.

Authors:  Kamal H Henderson; Darren A DeWalt; Jacquie Halladay; Bryan J Weiner; Jung I Kim; Jason Fine; Samuel Cykert
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Strategies and Factors Associated With Top Performance in Primary Care for Diabetes: Insights From a Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Leif I Solberg; Kevin A Peterson; Helen Fu; Milton Eder; Rachel Jacobsen; Caroline S Carlin
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.707

6.  Does the Belgian diabetes type 2 care trajectory improve quality of care for diabetes patients?

Authors:  Viviane F A Van Casteren; Nathalie H E Bossuyt; Sarah J S Moreels; Geert Goderis; Katrien Vanthomme; Johan Wens; Etienne W De Clercq
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2015-07-13

Review 7.  Rheumatic heart disease: infectious disease origin, chronic care approach.

Authors:  Judith M Katzenellenbogen; Anna P Ralph; Rosemary Wyber; Jonathan R Carapetis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  The Kidney Awareness Registry and Education (KARE) study: protocol of a randomized controlled trial to enhance provider and patient engagement with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Delphine S Tuot; Alexandra Velasquez; Charles E McCulloch; Tanushree Banerjee; Yunnuo Zhu; Chi-yuan Hsu; Margaret Handley; Dean Schillinger; Neil R Powe
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.388

9.  Advancing heart health in North Carolina primary care: the Heart Health NOW study protocol.

Authors:  Bryan J Weiner; Michael P Pignone; C Annette DuBard; Ann Lefebvre; Janet L Suttie; Janet K Freburger; Samuel Cykert
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Integration of Behavioral Health and Medical Services: Using Patient Experience as a Guide.

Authors:  Frances Deavers; Natasha DePesa; Jonathan Mitchell; Angela Mazza; Jeffrey Cassisi
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2015-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.