Literature DB >> 17973116

Functional genomics in radiation biology: a gateway to cellular systems-level studies.

Sally A Amundson1.   

Abstract

Cells respond to ionizing radiation through an intricate network of interacting signaling cascades that are engaged in the regulation of diverse cellular functions, such as cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, and apoptosis. While changes in protein modification, activity, and sub-cellular localization may directly mediate these responses, alterations in gene expression also represent a central component of the pathways involved. Studies of altered gene expression have historically played an important role in elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying cellular radiation response. In recent years, functional genomics approaches, such as microarray profiling, have been developed that can simultaneously monitor changes in gene expression across essentially the entire genome. However, analogous methods for global measurements of protein expression or modification have lagged behind. As global transcription profiling has become increasingly accessible, the quantity of information on gene expression responses to irradiation has increased dramatically. While many such experiments have provided improved insight into various aspects of radiation response, the diversity of experimental models and details of radiation dose, timing, and data analysis that have been employed means that no single consistent picture has emerged yet. More sophisticated methods for data analysis, data mining, and reverse engineering to reconstruct the underlying response pathways are continually being developed, and can extract additional value from profiling studies. As methods for the global study of other biomolecules become more routine, it will be important to integrate the results of radiation response profiling across multiple biological levels, and to build from simpler experimental systems toward more complex multi-cellular and in vivo systems. The future development of "integromic" models of radiation response should add substantially to the understanding gained from gene expression studies alone.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17973116     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-007-0140-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  50 in total

1.  Gene expression changes in mouse brain after exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation.

Authors:  E Yin; D O Nelson; M A Coleman; L E Peterson; A J Wyrobek
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.694

2.  Pathway studio--the analysis and navigation of molecular networks.

Authors:  Alexander Nikitin; Sergei Egorov; Nikolai Daraselia; Ilya Mazo
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  A method for detection of differential gene expression in the presence of inter-individual variability in response.

Authors:  David M Rocke; Zelanna Goldberg; Chad Schweitert; Alison Santana
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 4.  Bystander effect: biological endpoints and microarray analysis.

Authors:  M Ahmad Chaudhry
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Ratio-based decisions and the quantitative analysis of cDNA microarray images.

Authors:  Y Chen; E R Dougherty; M L Bittner
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray.

Authors:  M Schena; D Shalon; R W Davis; P O Brown
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-20       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to DNA-damaging agents does not identify the genes that protect against these agents.

Authors:  Geoff W Birrell; James A Brown; H Irene Wu; Guri Giaever; Angela M Chu; Ronald W Davis; J Martin Brown
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  An abnormality in the p53 pathway following gamma-irradiation in many wild-type p53 human melanoma lines.

Authors:  I Bae; M L Smith; M S Sheikh; Q Zhan; D A Scudiero; S H Friend; P M O'Connor; A J Fornace
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  RNAi microarray analysis in cultured mammalian cells.

Authors:  Spyro Mousses; Natasha J Caplen; Robert Cornelison; Don Weaver; Mark Basik; Sampsa Hautaniemi; Abdel G Elkahloun; Roberto A Lotufo; Ashish Choudary; Edward R Dougherty; Ed Suh; Olli Kallioniemi
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Direct evidence for the participation of gap junction-mediated intercellular communication in the transmission of damage signals from alpha -particle irradiated to nonirradiated cells.

Authors:  E I Azzam; S M de Toledo; J B Little
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  27 in total

1.  Whole mouse blood microRNA as biomarkers for exposure to γ-rays and (56)Fe ion.

Authors:  Thomas Templin; Sally A Amundson; David J Brenner; Lubomir B Smilenov
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 2.694

2.  Molecular biology: the key to personalised treatment in radiation oncology?

Authors:  D G Hirst; T Robson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  The first international workshop on systems radiation biology: a new approach to solve old questions.

Authors:  Herwig G Paretzke
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Richard Wakeford; E Janet Tawn; Simon D Bouffler; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Effect of irradiation on the expression of DNA repair genes studied in human fibroblasts by real-time qPCR using three methods of reference gene validation.

Authors:  Sebastian Reuther; Martina Reiter; Annette Raabe; Ekkehard Dikomey
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 6.  Assessing cancer risks of low-dose radiation.

Authors:  Leon Mullenders; Mike Atkinson; Herwig Paretzke; Laure Sabatier; Simon Bouffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Dynamics of the transcriptome response of cultured human embryonic stem cells to ionizing radiation exposure.

Authors:  Mykyta V Sokolov; Irina V Panyutin; Igor G Panyutin; Ronald D Neumann
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Global gene expression responses to low- or high-dose radiation in a human three-dimensional tissue model.

Authors:  Alexandre Mezentsev; Sally A Amundson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Induced expression of the IER5 gene by gamma-ray irradiation and its involvement in cell cycle checkpoint control and survival.

Authors:  Ku-Ke Ding; Zeng-Fu Shang; Chuan Hao; Qin-Zhi Xu; Jing-Jing Shen; Chuan-Jie Yang; Yue-Hua Xie; Cha Qiao; Yu Wang; Li-Li Xu; Ping-Kun Zhou
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 1.925

10.  Radiation Genes: a database devoted to microarrays screenings revealing transcriptome alterations induced by ionizing radiation in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Francesco Chiani; Camilla Iannone; Rodolfo Negri; Daniele Paoletti; Mattia D'Antonio; Paolo D'onorio De Meo; Tiziana Castrignanò
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 3.451

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.