Literature DB >> 12077312

Transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to DNA-damaging agents does not identify the genes that protect against these agents.

Geoff W Birrell1, James A Brown, H Irene Wu, Guri Giaever, Angela M Chu, Ronald W Davis, J Martin Brown.   

Abstract

The recent completion of the deletion of all of the nonessential genes in budding yeast has provided a powerful new way of determining those genes that affect the sensitivity of this organism to cytotoxic agents. We have used this system to test the hypothesis that genes whose transcription is increased after DNA damage are important for the survival to that damage. We used a pool of 4,627 diploid strains each with homozygous deletion of a nonessential gene to identify those genes that are important for the survival of yeast to four DNA-damaging agents: ionizing radiation, UV radiation, and exposure to cisplatin or to hydrogen peroxide. In addition we measured the transcriptional response of the wild-type parental strain to the same DNA-damaging agents. We found no relationship between the genes necessary for survival to the DNA-damaging agents and those genes whose transcription is increased after exposure. These data show that few, if any, of the genes involved in repairing the DNA lesions produced in this study, including double-strand breaks, pyrimidine dimers, single-strand breaks, base damage, and DNA cross-links, are induced in response to toxic doses of the agents that produce these lesions. This finding suggests that the enzymes necessary for the repair of these lesions are at sufficient levels within the cell. The data also suggest that the nature of the lesions produced by DNA-damaging agents cannot easily be deduced from gene expression profiling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12077312      PMCID: PMC124375          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.132275199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  33 in total

Review 1.  Radiation inducible DNA repair processes in eukaryotes.

Authors:  F Eckardt-Schupp; C Klaus
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.079

2.  Global response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to an alkylating agent.

Authors:  S A Jelinsky; L D Samson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Drug target validation and identification of secondary drug target effects using DNA microarrays.

Authors:  M J Marton; J L DeRisi; H A Bennett; V R Iyer; M R Meyer; C J Roberts; R Stoughton; J Burchard; D Slade; H Dai; D E Bassett; L H Hartwell; P O Brown; S H Friend
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  The transcriptional program in the response of human fibroblasts to serum.

Authors:  V R Iyer; M B Eisen; D T Ross; G Schuler; T Moore; J C Lee; J M Trent; L M Staudt; J Hudson; M S Boguski; D Lashkari; D Shalon; D Botstein; P O Brown
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Formation, prevention, and repair of DNA damage by iron/hydrogen peroxide.

Authors:  E S Henle; S Linn
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis.

Authors:  E A Winzeler; D D Shoemaker; A Astromoff; H Liang; K Anderson; B Andre; R Bangham; R Benito; J D Boeke; H Bussey; A M Chu; C Connelly; K Davis; F Dietrich; S W Dow; M El Bakkoury; F Foury; S H Friend; E Gentalen; G Giaever; J H Hegemann; T Jones; M Laub; H Liao; N Liebundguth; D J Lockhart; A Lucau-Danila; M Lussier; N M'Rabet; P Menard; M Mittmann; C Pai; C Rebischung; J L Revuelta; L Riles; C J Roberts; P Ross-MacDonald; B Scherens; M Snyder; S Sookhai-Mahadeo; R K Storms; S Véronneau; M Voet; G Volckaert; T R Ward; R Wysocki; G S Yen; K Yu; K Zimmermann; P Philippsen; M Johnston; R W Davis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-08-06       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Effects of controlled RAD52 expression on repair and recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  K J Dornfeld; D M Livingston
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling.

Authors:  A A Alizadeh; M B Eisen; R E Davis; C Ma; I S Lossos; A Rosenwald; J C Boldrick; H Sabet; T Tran; X Yu; J I Powell; L Yang; G E Marti; T Moore; J Hudson; L Lu; D B Lewis; R Tibshirani; G Sherlock; W C Chan; T C Greiner; D D Weisenburger; J O Armitage; R Warnke; R Levy; W Wilson; M R Grever; J C Byrd; D Botstein; P O Brown; L M Staudt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-03       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication and recombination defective mutants.

Authors:  C Chen; R D Kolodner
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization.

Authors:  P T Spellman; G Sherlock; M Q Zhang; V R Iyer; K Anders; M B Eisen; P O Brown; D Botstein; B Futcher
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.138

View more
  114 in total

1.  High-resolution yeast phenomics resolves different physiological features in the saline response.

Authors:  Jonas Warringer; Elke Ericson; Luciano Fernandez; Olle Nerman; Anders Blomberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The transcriptome of prematurely aging yeast cells is similar to that of telomerase-deficient cells.

Authors:  Isabelle Lesur; Judith L Campbell
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 3.  Information overload: assigning genetic functionality in the age of genomics and large-scale screening.

Authors:  D Scott Merrell; Andrew Camilli
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 17.079

4.  Systems level insights into the stress response to UV radiation in the halophilic archaeon Halobacterium NRC-1.

Authors:  Nitin S Baliga; Sarah J Bjork; Richard Bonneau; Min Pan; Chika Iloanusi; Molly C H Kottemann; Leroy Hood; Jocelyne DiRuggiero
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Portrait of transcriptional responses to ultraviolet and ionizing radiation in human cells.

Authors:  Kerri E Rieger; Gilbert Chu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Cells have distinct mechanisms to maintain protection against different reactive oxygen species: oxidative-stress-response genes.

Authors:  Geoffrey W Thorpe; Chii S Fong; Nazif Alic; Vincent J Higgins; Ian W Dawes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Bugs, drugs and chemical genomics.

Authors:  Terry Roemer; Julian Davies; Guri Giaever; Corey Nislow
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 15.040

8.  Regulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase eta transcript and protein.

Authors:  Ritu Pabla; Donald Rozario; Wolfram Siede
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  RTEL1 maintains genomic stability by suppressing homologous recombination.

Authors:  Louise J Barber; Jillian L Youds; Jordan D Ward; Michael J McIlwraith; Nigel J O'Neil; Mark I R Petalcorin; Julie S Martin; Spencer J Collis; Sharon B Cantor; Melissa Auclair; Heidi Tissenbaum; Stephen C West; Ann M Rose; Simon J Boulton
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Cell cycle progression in G1 and S phases is CCR4 dependent following ionizing radiation or replication stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Tammy J Westmoreland; Jeffrey R Marks; John A Olson; Eric M Thompson; Michael A Resnick; Craig B Bennett
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2004-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.