Literature DB >> 17972723

A visual short-term memory advantage for faces.

Kim M Curby1, Isabel Gauthier.   

Abstract

What determines how much can be stored in visual short-term memory (VSTM)? Studies of VSTM have focused largely on stimulus-based properties such as the number or complexity of the items stored. Recent work also suggests that capacity is severely reduced for items within the same category. However, the importance for VSTM capacity of more qualitative differences in processing for different categories has not been investigated. For example, faces are processed more holistically than other objects. In Experiments 1 and 2, we show that the processing of faces, objects that are crucial socially and for which we possess considerable expertise, overcomes these limitations. More faces can be stored in VSTM than objects from other complex nonface categories. As in prior studies, at short encoding durations we found that capacity for faces was less than that for other categories. However, at longer encoding durations, capacity for faces exceeded that for nonface objects, and this advantage was specific to upright faces. Because inversion reduces holistic processing, the interaction of orientation with VSTM capacity-which occurred for faces but no t objects in Experiment 3--suggests that it is holistic processing that confers an advantage for face VSTM when sufficient encoding time is allowed.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17972723     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  20 in total

1.  Postattentive vision.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; N Klempen; K Dahlen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  E K Vogel; G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  The time course of consolidation in visual working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  Visual complexity: a review.

Authors:  Don C Donderi
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Understanding the object benefit in visual short-term memory: the roles of feature proximity and connectedness.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-07

Review 7.  How does the brain process upright and inverted faces?

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev       Date:  2002-03

8.  The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: direct evidence.

Authors:  A Freire; K Lee; L A Symons
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  What causes the face inversion effect?

Authors:  M J Farah; J W Tanaka; H M Drain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  M M Chun; M C Potter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  42 in total

1.  Enhancing visual working memory encoding: The role of target novelty.

Authors:  Jutta S Mayer; Jejoong Kim; Sohee Park
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011

2.  Perceptual expertise enhances the resolution but not the number of representations in working memory.

Authors:  Miranda Scolari; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

3.  Item response theory analyses of the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT).

Authors:  Sun-Joo Cho; Jeremy Wilmer; Grit Herzmann; Rankin Williams McGugin; Daniel Fiset; Ana E Van Gulick; Kaitlin F Ryan; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2015-02-02

Review 4.  A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Working memory capacity of biological movements predicts empathy traits.

Authors:  Zaifeng Gao; Tian Ye; Mowei Shen; Anat Perry
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

6.  Familiarity increases the number of remembered Pokémon in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Weizhen Xie; Weiwei Zhang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-05

Review 7.  A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  A visual short-term memory advantage for objects of expertise.

Authors:  Kim M Curby; Kuba Glazek; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The attentional blink reveals the probabilistic nature of discrete conscious perception.

Authors:  Christopher L Asplund; Daryl Fougnie; Samir Zughni; Justin W Martin; René Marois
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-01-16

10.  The temporal advantage for individuating objects of expertise: perceptual expertise is an early riser.

Authors:  Kim M Curby; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.