Literature DB >> 17971324

Modelling studies to estimate the prevalence of foot-and-mouth disease carriers after reactive vaccination.

M E Arnold1, D J Paton, E Ryan, S J Cox, J W Wilesmith.   

Abstract

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is a highly contagious and economically significant viral disease of cloven-hoofed animals. Vaccination can be used to help restrict the spread of the infection, but evidence must be provided to show that the infection has been eradicated in order to regain the FMD-free status. While serological tests have been developed, which can identify animals that have been infected regardless of vaccination status, it is vital to know the probable prevalence of herds with FMD carriers and the within-herd prevalence of those carriers in order to design efficient post-epidemic surveillance strategies that establish freedom from disease. Here, we present the results of a study to model the expected prevalence of carriers after application of emergency vaccination and the impact of this on the sensitivity of test systems for their detection. Results showed that the expected prevalence of carrier-containing herds after reactive vaccination is likely to be very low, approximately 0.2%, and there will only be a small number of carriers, most likely one, in the positive herds. Therefore, sensitivity for carrier detection can be optimized by adopting an individual-based testing regime in which all animals in all vaccinated herds are tested and positive animals rather than herds are culled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17971324      PMCID: PMC2562402          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  19 in total

1.  On the surveillance for animal diseases in small herds.

Authors:  Matthias Greiner; Aldo Dekker
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 2.670

Review 2.  Selection of foot and mouth disease vaccine strains--a review.

Authors:  D J Paton; J F Valarcher; I Bergmann; O G Matlho; V M Zakharov; E L Palma; G R Thomson
Journal:  Rev Sci Tech       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.181

3.  Spatio-temporal point processes, partial likelihood, foot and mouth disease.

Authors:  Peter J Diggle
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  Comparative evaluation of six ELISAs for the detection of antibodies to the non-structural proteins of foot-and-mouth disease virus.

Authors:  E Brocchi; I E Bergmann; A Dekker; D J Paton; D J Sammin; M Greiner; S Grazioli; F De Simone; H Yadin; B Haas; N Bulut; V Malirat; E Neitzert; N Goris; S Parida; K Sørensen; K De Clercq
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Optimal reactive vaccination strategies for a foot-and-mouth outbreak in the UK.

Authors:  Michael J Tildesley; Nicholas J Savill; Darren J Shaw; Rob Deardon; Stephen P Brooks; Mark E J Woolhouse; Bryan T Grenfell; Matt J Keeling
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Application of non-structural protein antibody tests in substantiating freedom from foot-and-mouth disease virus infection after emergency vaccination of cattle.

Authors:  David J Paton; Kris de Clercq; Matthias Greiner; Aldo Dekker; Emiliana Brocchi; Ingrid Bergmann; Donal J Sammin; Simon Gubbins; Satya Parida
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Transmission of foot-and-mouth disease by vaccinated cattle following natural challenge.

Authors:  A I Donaldson; R P Kitching
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.534

8.  Demonstrating freedom from disease using multiple complex data sources 2: case study--classical swine fever in Denmark.

Authors:  P A J Martin; A R Cameron; K Barfod; E S G Sergeant; M Greiner
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 2.670

9.  Emergency vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease: rate of development of immunity and its implications for the carrier state.

Authors:  T R Doel; L Williams; P V Barnett
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Effect of emergency FMD vaccine antigen payload on protection, sub-clinical infection and persistence following direct contact challenge of cattle.

Authors:  S J Cox; C Voyce; S Parida; S M Reid; P A Hamblin; G Hutchings; D J Paton; P V Barnett
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 3.641

View more
  7 in total

1.  Modelling the effectiveness and risks of vaccination strategies to control classical swine fever epidemics.

Authors:  Jantien A Backer; Thomas J Hagenaars; Herman J W van Roermund; Mart C M de Jong
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Options for control of foot-and-mouth disease: knowledge, capability and policy.

Authors:  David J Paton; Keith J Sumption; Bryan Charleston
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Developing vaccines against foot-and-mouth disease and some other exotic viral diseases of livestock.

Authors:  David J Paton; Geraldine Taylor
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Risk-targeted selection of agricultural holdings for post-epidemic surveillance: estimation of efficiency gains.

Authors:  Ian G Handel; Barend M de C Bronsvoort; John F Forbes; Mark E J Woolhouse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease: do initial conditions affect its benefit?

Authors:  Thibaud Porphyre; Harriet K Auty; Michael J Tildesley; George J Gunn; Mark E J Woolhouse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Assessing the Economic Impact of Vaccine Availability When Controlling Foot and Mouth Disease Outbreaks.

Authors:  Thibaud Porphyre; Karl M Rich; Harriet K Auty
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-03-13

Review 7.  Experimental evaluation of foot-and-mouth disease vaccines for emergency use in ruminants and pigs: a review.

Authors:  Sarah J Cox; Paul V Barnett
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 3.683

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.