Literature DB >> 8085375

Emergency vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease: rate of development of immunity and its implications for the carrier state.

T R Doel1, L Williams, P V Barnett.   

Abstract

Emergency foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccines prepared from antigens held in the International Vaccine Bank at Pirbright were administered to cattle and pigs and the levels of protection were assessed following challenge by contact with infected pigs. Both Al(OH)3/saponin and oil-based cattle vaccines proved to be extremely effective and protected soon after vaccination (4 days postvaccination), whereas the pigs were seldom protected before 21 and 28 days postvaccination, probably due to lower levels of antibody and overwhelming challenge conditions. Early production of cattle occurred in the absence of significant levels of circulating antibody as measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, a neutralization assay and a passive protection test. A large number of the cattle vaccinated with the O1 Lausanne strain of FMD and subsequently challenged with this virus became persistently infected and there appeared to be a correlation with the time interval between vaccination and challenge. When the same cattle were vaccinated approximately 4 months later with a different strain of FMD, C1 Oberbayern, and challenged with this strain, the number of persistently infected animals was considerably lower. The results are discussed in the context of the use of emergency vaccines to prevent the dissemination of FMD from disease foci.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8085375     DOI: 10.1016/0264-410x(94)90262-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  29 in total

1.  Foot and mouth disease: why not vaccinate?

Authors:  J Beale
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Use of the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for the rapid diagnosis of foot and mouth disease in South America.

Authors:  A Clavijo; P J Viera-Pereira; I Bergmann
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.459

3.  Protection against direct in-contact challenge following foot-and-mouth disease vaccination in sheep and goats: the effect on virus excretion and carrier status.

Authors:  Muthukrishnan Madhanmohan; Singanallur Balasubramanian Nagendrakumar; Villuppanoor Alwar Srinivasan
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.459

4.  Induction of foot-and-mouth disease virus-specific cytotoxic T cell killing by vaccination.

Authors:  Jared R Patch; Lasse E Pedersen; Felix N Toka; Mauro Moraes; Marvin J Grubman; Morten Nielsen; Gregers Jungersen; Soren Buus; William T Golde
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2010-12-22

5.  Use of a standardized bovine serum panel to evaluate a multiplexed nonstructural protein antibody assay for serological surveillance of foot-and-mouth disease.

Authors:  Julie Perkins; Satya Parida; Alfonso Clavijo
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2007-10-03

6.  Modelling studies to estimate the prevalence of foot-and-mouth disease carriers after reactive vaccination.

Authors:  M E Arnold; D J Paton; E Ryan; S J Cox; J W Wilesmith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Evaluation of a Fiber-Modified Adenovirus Vector Vaccine against Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Cattle.

Authors:  Gisselle N Medina; Nestor Montiel; Fayna Diaz-San Segundo; Diego Sturza; Elizabeth Ramirez-Medina; Marvin J Grubman; Teresa de los Santos
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2015-11-25

8.  Redefining the "carrier" state for foot-and-mouth disease from the dynamics of virus persistence in endemically affected cattle populations.

Authors:  Barend M deC Bronsvoort; Ian G Handel; Charles K Nfon; Karl-Johan Sørensen; Viviana Malirat; Ingrid Bergmann; Vincent N Tanya; Kenton L Morgan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Innate immune defenses induced by CpG do not promote vaccine-induced protection against foot-and-mouth disease virus in pigs.

Authors:  M P Alves; L Guzylack-Piriou; V Juillard; J-C Audonnet; T Doel; H Dawson; W T Golde; H Gerber; N Peduto; K C McCullough; A Summerfield
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2009-06-24

Review 10.  Experimental evaluation of foot-and-mouth disease vaccines for emergency use in ruminants and pigs: a review.

Authors:  Sarah J Cox; Paul V Barnett
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 3.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.