Literature DB >> 16642769

Selection of foot and mouth disease vaccine strains--a review.

D J Paton1, J F Valarcher, I Bergmann, O G Matlho, V M Zakharov, E L Palma, G R Thomson.   

Abstract

The choice of the most appropriate strains of foot and mouth disease (FMD) virus vaccines to use in FMD control programmes and to store in vaccine antigen reserves is based on the matching of representative field isolates from outbreaks around the world to available vaccine strains. However, those involved in FMD control at a national level do not always give this work a high priority, while in countries without effective control of FMD there is little incentive to collect samples or to overcome the constraints on submission to international reference laboratories. In the short term, specific initiatives for targeted collection can provide samples on a periodic basis, but a long-term solution requires the development of FMD control measures. This must be underpinned by the strengthening of local Veterinary Services and laboratories, and by demand-driven provision of sufficient amounts of high-quality vaccine. Difficulties may be increased by commercial constraints on disclosure of the strains used for vaccine production and on the supply of reagents needed for matching tests. Vaccine matching tests are mainly based on in vitro methods - such as virus neutralisation, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with polyclonal antibodies and complement fixation - and are performed in a relatively small number of laboratories around the world. In addition to the difficulties of gathering representative field and vaccine strains, neither the reagents nor the methods used for vaccine matching are fully harmonised. Consequently, there is no strict equivalence in the results obtained. Alternative approaches using monoclonal antibody panels and/or viral capsid gene sequencing are being developed and could complement the currently employed serological tests. However, there is limited in vivo cross-protection information, more of which is essential for future validation of the vaccine matching methods. In response to the funding and leadership deficit for vaccine strain selection, a network of World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) and Food and Agriculture Organization FMD reference laboratories has been established; this gives these laboratories the potential to strengthen the coordination of their work and reporting and thereby improve recommendations on vaccine strain selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16642769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Sci Tech        ISSN: 0253-1933            Impact factor:   1.181


  39 in total

Review 1.  Options for control of foot-and-mouth disease: knowledge, capability and policy.

Authors:  David J Paton; Keith J Sumption; Bryan Charleston
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Comparison of test methodologies for foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype A vaccine matching.

Authors:  Tesfaalem Tekleghiorghis; Klaas Weerdmeester; Froukje van Hemert-Kluitenberg; Rob J M Moormann; Aldo Dekker
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2014-03-12

3.  Two Cross-Protective Antigen Sites on Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Serotype O Structurally Revealed by Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies from Cattle.

Authors:  Kun Li; Yong He; Li Wang; Pinghua Li; Sheng Wang; Pu Sun; Huifang Bao; Yimei Cao; Xuerong Liu; Guoqiang Zhu; Yali Song; Xingwen Bai; Xueqing Ma; Yuanfang Fu; Hong Yuan; Jing Zhang; Jian Wang; Yingli Chen; Dong Li; Zhiyong Lou; Zaixin Liu; Zengjun Lu
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Modelling studies to estimate the prevalence of foot-and-mouth disease carriers after reactive vaccination.

Authors:  M E Arnold; D J Paton; E Ryan; S J Cox; J W Wilesmith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Repeated exposure to 5D9, an inhibitor of 3D polymerase, effectively limits the replication of foot-and-mouth disease virus in host cells.

Authors:  Devendra K Rai; Elizabeth A Schafer; Kamalendra Singh; Mark A McIntosh; Stefan G Sarafianos; Elizabeth Rieder
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 5.970

6.  Developing vaccines against foot-and-mouth disease and some other exotic viral diseases of livestock.

Authors:  David J Paton; Geraldine Taylor
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Experimental evaluation of foot-and-mouth disease vaccines for emergency use in ruminants and pigs: a review.

Authors:  Sarah J Cox; Paul V Barnett
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 3.683

8.  Multiple origins of foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype Asia 1 outbreaks, 2003-2007.

Authors:  Jean Francois Valarcher; Nick J Knowles; Valery Zakharov; Alexey Scherbakov; Zhidong Zhang; You Jun Shang; Zai Xin Liu; Xiang Tao Liu; Aniket Sanyal; Divakar Hemadri; Chakradhar Tosh; Thaha J Rasool; Bramhadev Pattnaik; Kate R Schumann; Tammy R Beckham; Wilai Linchongsubongkoch; Nigel P Ferris; Peter L Roeder; David J Paton
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Genetic characterization of foot-and-mouth disease viruses, Ethiopia, 1981-2007.

Authors:  Gelagay Ayelet; Mana Mahapatra; Esayas Gelaye; Berhe G Egziabher; Tesfaye Rufeal; Mesfin Sahle; Nigel P Ferris; Jemma Wadsworth; Geoffrey H Hutchings; Nick J Knowles
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Laboratory capacity for diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease in Eastern Africa: implications for the progressive control pathway.

Authors:  Alice Namatovu; Sabenzia Nabalayo Wekesa; Kirsten Tjørnehøj; Moses Tefula Dhikusooka; Vincent B Muwanika; Hans Redlef Siegsmund; Chrisostom Ayebazibwe
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.