Literature DB >> 16488060

Effect of emergency FMD vaccine antigen payload on protection, sub-clinical infection and persistence following direct contact challenge of cattle.

S J Cox1, C Voyce, S Parida, S M Reid, P A Hamblin, G Hutchings, D J Paton, P V Barnett.   

Abstract

Previous work, in sheep vaccinated with emergency foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccine, indicated the benefit of increasing the antigen payload in inhibiting local virus replication and consequently persistence following an indirect aerosol challenge with a virus homologous to the vaccine strain. The work presented here investigates this possibility further using cattle and a more severe semi-heterologous direct contact challenge. The quantitative dynamics of virus replication and excretion in both vaccinated and non-vaccinated cattle following challenge are examined. Two experiments were carried out each involving 20 vaccinated and 5 non-vaccinated cattle. An O(1) Manisa vaccine (18 PD(50)) was used for the first, previously reported experiment [Cox SJ, Voyce C, Parida S, Reid SM, Hamblin PA, Paton DJ, et al. Protection against direct contact challenge following emergency FMD vaccination of cattle and the effect on virus excretion from the oropharynx. Vaccine 2005;23:1106-13]. The same vaccine was used for the second experiment described in this paper except the antigen payload was increased 10-fold per bovine dose, resulting in significantly higher FMD virus neutralising antibody titres prior to challenge. Twenty-one days post-vaccination the cattle received a 5-day direct contact challenge with FMD virus from five further non-vaccinated cattle infected 24h earlier with O UKG 34/2001. All vaccinated cattle regardless of antigen payload were protected against clinical disease. Sub-clinical oropharyngeal infection was detected in animals from both experiments but the level of virus replication shortly after direct contact challenge was significantly reduced in vaccinated animals. Cattle immunised with the 10-fold antigen payload cleared the virus more readily and consequently at 28 days post-challenge fewer animals were persistently infected compared to the single strength vaccine. Following a severe challenge, the results from both experiments show that use of emergency vaccine can prevent or decrease local virus replication and thereby dramatically reduce the amount of virus released into the environment, particularly during the early post-exposure period. Additionally, increasing the antigen payload of the vaccine may reduce sub-clinical infection, leading to fewer persistently infected virus carrier animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16488060     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.01.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  20 in total

1.  Systemic Foot-and-Mouth Disease Vaccination in Cattle Promotes Specific Antibody-Secreting Cells at the Respiratory Tract and Triggers Local Anamnestic Responses upon Aerosol Infection.

Authors:  J Pega; S Di Giacomo; D Bucafusco; J M Schammas; D Malacari; F Barrionuevo; A V Capozzo; L L Rodríguez; M V Borca; M Pérez-Filgueira
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Protection against direct in-contact challenge following foot-and-mouth disease vaccination in sheep and goats: the effect on virus excretion and carrier status.

Authors:  Muthukrishnan Madhanmohan; Singanallur Balasubramanian Nagendrakumar; Villuppanoor Alwar Srinivasan
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.459

3.  Use of a standardized bovine serum panel to evaluate a multiplexed nonstructural protein antibody assay for serological surveillance of foot-and-mouth disease.

Authors:  Julie Perkins; Satya Parida; Alfonso Clavijo
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2007-10-03

4.  Modelling studies to estimate the prevalence of foot-and-mouth disease carriers after reactive vaccination.

Authors:  M E Arnold; D J Paton; E Ryan; S J Cox; J W Wilesmith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Development of a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of antibodies against the 3B protein of foot-and-mouth disease virus.

Authors:  Ming Yang; Satya Parida; Tim Salo; Kate Hole; Lauro Velazquez-Salinas; Alfonso Clavijo
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2015-02-04

6.  Virus Excretion from Foot-And-Mouth Disease Virus Carrier Cattle and Their Potential Role in Causing New Outbreaks.

Authors:  Aravindh Babu R Parthiban; Mana Mahapatra; Simon Gubbins; Satya Parida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Experimental evaluation of foot-and-mouth disease vaccines for emergency use in ruminants and pigs: a review.

Authors:  Sarah J Cox; Paul V Barnett
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 3.683

8.  Development and Validation of Confirmatory Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Antibody ELISAs to Identify Infected Animals in Vaccinated Populations.

Authors:  Anuj Tewari; Helen Ambrose; Krupali Parekh; Toru Inoue; Javier Guitian; Antonello Di Nardo; David James Paton; Satya Parida
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 5.048

9.  Development and Validation of a Mucosal Antibody (IgA) Test to Identify Persistent Infection with Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus.

Authors:  Jitendra K Biswal; Antonello Di Nardo; Geraldine Taylor; David J Paton; Satya Parida
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 5.048

10.  Complete Genome Sequences of Serotype O Foot-and-Mouth Disease Viruses Recovered from Experimental Persistently Infected Cattle.

Authors:  AravindhBabu R Parthiban; Mana Mahapatra; Satya Parida
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2015-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.