Literature DB >> 15894392

On the surveillance for animal diseases in small herds.

Matthias Greiner1, Aldo Dekker.   

Abstract

Small herds may present a problem in surveillance for infectious animal diseases because typical levels of a within-herd design prevalence are not directly applicable. We suggest a definition of small herds as those smaller than 2/(within-herd design prevalence) on the basis that such herds would be expected to have less than two (i.e. only one) infected animals. Consequently, the probability of detecting small herds cannot be improved by choosing a larger sample size within the herd. We derive necessary sample sizes of herds and the probability ("confidence") of detecting disease within a stratum of small herds, given the among-herd design prevalence and test diagnostic sensitivity. Both a binomial model and a Poisson model can be used to establish the confidence for a given sample size of herds (and vice versa). The results of a simulation study suggest that the Poisson model provides more conservative (lower) estimates of the confidence for a given sample size and should therefore be preferred.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15894392     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  4 in total

1.  Modelling studies to estimate the prevalence of foot-and-mouth disease carriers after reactive vaccination.

Authors:  M E Arnold; D J Paton; E Ryan; S J Cox; J W Wilesmith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Active animal health surveillance in European Union Member States: gaps and opportunities.

Authors:  B Bisdorff; B Schauer; N Taylor; V Rodríguez-Prieto; A Comin; A Brouwer; F Dórea; J Drewe; L Hoinville; A Lindberg; M Martinez Avilés; B Martínez-López; M Peyre; J Pinto Ferreira; J Rushton; G VAN Schaik; K D C Stärk; C Staubach; M Vicente-Rubiano; G Witteveen; D Pfeiffer; B Häsler
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 4.434

3.  Risk-targeted selection of agricultural holdings for post-epidemic surveillance: estimation of efficiency gains.

Authors:  Ian G Handel; Barend M de C Bronsvoort; John F Forbes; Mark E J Woolhouse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Comparative assessment of passive surveillance in disease-free and endemic situation: example of Brucella melitensis surveillance in Switzerland and in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Authors:  Daniela C Hadorn; Sabina Seric Haracic; Katharina D C Stärk
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.741

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.