PURPOSE: To determine if magnetic field exposure close to two clinical 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners during image acquisition and when moving in the spatially-varying static magnetic field is compliant with European Union (EU) Directive 2004/40/EC (the Directive). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using commercially available equipment we measured the magnetic flux density around the scanners during two clinical pulse sequences. The data was compared with frequency-dependent limits that will limit occupational exposure following transposition of the Directive into national law in 2008. The static magnetic field was measured around the scanners and the exposure from movement within this field was simulated. RESULTS: The whole-body exposure experienced when standing close to the face of the magnet exceeds the limits in the Directive on the two scanners tested during clinical sequences. Simulation of movement toward the scanner shows that speeds must be restricted to 1/5 of normal walking speed to comply with the Directive. CONCLUSION: EU Directive 2004/40/EC will have a major impact on the current use and future development of MRI due to limitations on exposure to time-varying gradient fields and movement within the spatially-varying static field. This will make interventional work impossible and routine MRI use impracticable in Europe.
PURPOSE: To determine if magnetic field exposure close to two clinical 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners during image acquisition and when moving in the spatially-varying static magnetic field is compliant with European Union (EU) Directive 2004/40/EC (the Directive). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using commercially available equipment we measured the magnetic flux density around the scanners during two clinical pulse sequences. The data was compared with frequency-dependent limits that will limit occupational exposure following transposition of the Directive into national law in 2008. The static magnetic field was measured around the scanners and the exposure from movement within this field was simulated. RESULTS: The whole-body exposure experienced when standing close to the face of the magnet exceeds the limits in the Directive on the two scanners tested during clinical sequences. Simulation of movement toward the scanner shows that speeds must be restricted to 1/5 of normal walking speed to comply with the Directive. CONCLUSION: EU Directive 2004/40/EC will have a major impact on the current use and future development of MRI due to limitations on exposure to time-varying gradient fields and movement within the spatially-varying static field. This will make interventional work impossible and routine MRI use impracticable in Europe.
Authors: Harun R Gungor; Semih Akkaya; Nusret Ok; Aygun Yorukoglu; Cagdas Yorukoglu; Esat Kiter; Emin O Oguz; Nazan Keskin; Gulcin A Mete Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Evridiki Batistatou; Anna Mölter; Hans Kromhout; Martie van Tongeren; Stuart Crozier; Kristel Schaap; Penny Gowland; Stephen F Keevil; Frank de Vocht Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2015-12-16 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Riccardo Di Liberto; Daniele Andreuccetti; Moreno Comelli; Giancarlo Burriesci Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-27 Impact factor: 3.390