PURPOSE: To assess noninvasively the tumor microenvironment of neck nodal metastases in patients with head-and-neck cancer by investigating the relationship between tumor perfusion measured using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and hypoxia measured by (18)F-fluoromisonidazole ((18)F-FMISO) positron emission tomography (PET). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirteen newly diagnosed head-and-neck cancer patients with metastatic neck nodes underwent DCE-MRI and (18)F-FMISO PET imaging before chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The matched regions of interests from both modalities were analyzed. To examine the correlations between DCE-MRI parameters and standard uptake value (SUV) measurements from (18)F-FMISO PET, the nonparametric Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated. Furthermore, DCE-MRI parameters were compared between nodes with (18)F-FMISO uptake and nodes with no (18)F-FMISO uptake using Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: For the 13 patients, a total of 18 nodes were analyzed. The nodal size strongly correlated with the (18)F-FMISO SUV (rho = 0.74, p < 0.001). There was a strong negative correlation between the median k(ep) (redistribution rate constant) value (rho = -0.58, p = 0.042) and the (18)F-FMISO SUV. Hypoxic nodes (moderate to severe (18)F-FMISO uptake) had significantly lower median K(trans) (volume transfer constant) (p = 0.049) and median k(ep) (p = 0.027) values than did nonhypoxic nodes (no (18)F-FMISO uptake). CONCLUSION: This initial evaluation of the preliminary results support the hypothesis that in metastatic neck lymph nodes, hypoxic nodes are poorly perfused (i.e., have significantly lower K(trans) and k(ep) values) compared with nonhypoxic nodes. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PURPOSE: To assess noninvasively the tumor microenvironment of neck nodal metastases in patients with head-and-neck cancer by investigating the relationship between tumor perfusion measured using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and hypoxia measured by (18)F-fluoromisonidazole ((18)F-FMISO) positron emission tomography (PET). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirteen newly diagnosed head-and-neck cancerpatients with metastatic neck nodes underwent DCE-MRI and (18)F-FMISO PET imaging before chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The matched regions of interests from both modalities were analyzed. To examine the correlations between DCE-MRI parameters and standard uptake value (SUV) measurements from (18)F-FMISO PET, the nonparametric Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated. Furthermore, DCE-MRI parameters were compared between nodes with (18)F-FMISO uptake and nodes with no (18)F-FMISO uptake using Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: For the 13 patients, a total of 18 nodes were analyzed. The nodal size strongly correlated with the (18)F-FMISO SUV (rho = 0.74, p < 0.001). There was a strong negative correlation between the median k(ep) (redistribution rate constant) value (rho = -0.58, p = 0.042) and the (18)F-FMISO SUV. Hypoxic nodes (moderate to severe (18)F-FMISO uptake) had significantly lower median K(trans) (volume transfer constant) (p = 0.049) and median k(ep) (p = 0.027) values than did nonhypoxic nodes (no (18)F-FMISO uptake). CONCLUSION: This initial evaluation of the preliminary results support the hypothesis that in metastatic neck lymph nodes, hypoxic nodes are poorly perfused (i.e., have significantly lower K(trans) and k(ep) values) compared with nonhypoxic nodes. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: J S Rasey; W J Koh; M L Evans; L M Peterson; T K Lewellen; M M Graham; K A Krohn Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1996-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Joseph G Rajendran; David L Schwartz; Janet O'Sullivan; Lanell M Peterson; Patrick Ng; Jeffrey Scharnhorst; John R Grierson; Kenneth A Krohn Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jürgen Dunst; Peter Stadler; Axel Becker; Christine Lautenschläger; Tanja Pelz; Gabriele Hänsgen; Michael Molls; Thomas Kuhnt Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: HyungJoon Cho; Ellen Ackerstaff; Sean Carlin; Mihaela E Lupu; Ya Wang; Asif Rizwan; Joseph O'Donoghue; C Clifton Ling; John L Humm; Pat B Zanzonico; Jason A Koutcher Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: P S Tofts; G Brix; D L Buckley; J L Evelhoch; E Henderson; M V Knopp; H B Larsson; T Y Lee; N A Mayr; G J Parker; R E Port; J Taylor; R M Weisskoff Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Jacobus Fa Jansen; Yonggang Lu; Gaorav Gupta; Nancy Y Lee; Hilda E Stambuk; Yousef Mazaheri; Joseph O Deasy; Amita Shukla-Dave Journal: World J Radiol Date: 2016-01-28
Authors: Jacobus F A Jansen; Diane L Carlson; Yonggang Lu; Hilda E Stambuk; Andre L Moreira; Bhuvanesh Singh; Snehal G Patel; Dennis H Kraus; Richard J Wong; Ashok R Shaha; Jatin P Shah; Amita Shukla-Dave Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2012-02-25 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: S Chawla; S Kim; L A Loevner; W-T Hwang; G Weinstein; A Chalian; H Quon; H Poptani Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 3.825