Literature DB >> 17934799

The influence of surface topography on wear debris generation at the cement/bone interface under cyclic loading.

Kirk A Stoffel1, Dongliang T Yang, Dwayne Arola.   

Abstract

The long-term success of a total joint replacement can be undermined by loosening of the implant, generation of wear debris or a combination of both factors. In the present study the influence of the surface morphologies of the bone and cement mantle on loosening of cemented total joint replacements (THJRs) and development of wear debris were studied. Model cemented THJR specimens were prepared in which the femoral canal was textured using specific cutting tools. The specimens were subjected to cyclic loads inducing pure shear fatigue of the cement/bone interface. Changes in both the femoral canal and cement mantle resulting from fatigue were quantified in terms of the surface topography and the volume of wear debris. Loosening occurred with cyclic loading due to degradation of the cement and bone and resulted in the development of cement and bone particles. There was no correlation between the fatigue strength of the interfaces and the volume of wear debris. In general, the change in surface topography of the cement mantle with fatigue decreased with increasing volume of cement interdigitation. Femoral canal surfaces with symmetric profile height distribution (i.e., Gaussian surfaces) resulted in the lowest volume of generated debris.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17934799     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-007-3273-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  29 in total

1.  Mechanical strength of the cement-bone interface is greater in shear than in tension.

Authors:  K A Mann; F W Werner; D C Ayers
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  The apparent volume of interdigitation: a new parameter for evaluating the influence of surface topography on mechanical interlock.

Authors:  D D Arola; D T Yang; K A Stoffel
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2001

Review 3.  Cemented femoral stems: what matters most.

Authors:  Daniel J Berry
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Cemented femoral component surface finish mechanics.

Authors:  R D Crowninshield; J D Jennings; M L Laurent; W J Maloney
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Tensile strength of the cement-bone interface depends on the amount of bone interdigitated with PMMA cement.

Authors:  K A Mann; D C Ayers; F W Werner; R J Nicoletta; M D Fortino
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Duration and frequency of every day activities in total hip patients.

Authors:  M Morlock; E Schneider; A Bluhm; M Vollmer; G Bergmann; V Müller; M Honl
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Bone lysis in well-fixed cemented femoral components.

Authors:  W J Maloney; M Jasty; A Rosenberg; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-11

8.  Osteolysis in alloarthroplasty of the hip. The role of bone cement fragmentation.

Authors:  H G Willert; H Bertram; G H Buchhorn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The effects of particulate bone cements at the bone-implant interface.

Authors:  J A Wimhurst; R A Brooks; N Rushton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-05

10.  The prevalence of femoral osteolysis associated with components inserted with or without cement in total hip replacements. A retrospective matched-pair series.

Authors:  D D Goetz; E J Smith; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  1 in total

1.  Fatigue creep damage at the cement-bone interface: an experimental and a micro-mechanical finite element study.

Authors:  Daan Waanders; Dennis Janssen; Mark A Miller; Kenneth A Mann; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 2.712

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.