Literature DB >> 10541077

Mechanical strength of the cement-bone interface is greater in shear than in tension.

K A Mann1, F W Werner, D C Ayers.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the relative mechanical properties of the cement-bone interface due to tensile or shear loading. Mechanical tests were performed on cement-bone specimens in tensile (n = 51) or shear (n = 55) test jigs under the displacement control at 1 mm/min until complete failure. Before testing, the quantity of bone interdigitated with the cement was determined and served as a covariate in the study. The apparent strength of the cement-bone interface was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) for the interface when loaded in shear (2.25 MPa) when compared to tensile loading (1.35 MPa). Significantly higher energies to failure (p < 0.0001) and displacement before failure (p < 0.01) were also determined for the shear specimens. The post-yield softening response was not different for the two test directions. The data obtained herein suggests that cement-bone interfaces with equal amounts of tensile and shear stress would be more likely to fail under tensile loading.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10541077     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00107-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  12 in total

1.  The behavior of the micro-mechanical cement-bone interface affects the cement failure in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Daan Waanders; Dennis Janssen; Kenneth A Mann; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  The influence of surface topography on wear debris generation at the cement/bone interface under cyclic loading.

Authors:  Kirk A Stoffel; Dongliang T Yang; Dwayne Arola
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  The mechanical effects of different levels of cement penetration at the cement-bone interface.

Authors:  Daan Waanders; Dennis Janssen; Kenneth A Mann; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  The effect of application time of two types of bone cement on the cement-bone interface strength.

Authors:  Ziad Dahabreh; Hannah Kalpana Phillips; Todd Stewart; Martin Stone
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-09-06

5.  Multi-axial loading micromechanics of the cement-bone interface in postmortem retrievals and lab-prepared specimens.

Authors:  Mark A Miller; Amos Race; Daan Waanders; Richard Cleary; Dennis Janssen; Nico Verdonschot; Kenneth A Mann
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2010-11-16

6.  Interfacial fracture toughness of synthetic bone-cement interface.

Authors:  J Tong
Journal:  Key Eng Mater       Date:  2006-06-15

7.  In vitro fatigue failure of cemented acetabular replacements: a hip simulator study.

Authors:  N P Zant; P Heaton-Adegbile; J G Hussell; J Tong
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Characterisation of a metallic foam-cement composite under selected loading conditions.

Authors:  Gianluca Tozzi; Qing-Hang Zhang; Colin Lupton; Jie Tong; Teodolito Guillen; Arne Ohrndorf; Hans-Jurgen Christ
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Determination of interfacial fracture toughness of bone-cement interface using sandwich Brazilian disks.

Authors:  J Tong; K Y Wong; C Lupton
Journal:  Eng Fract Mech       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.406

10.  Biomechanical evaluation of bone screw fixation with a novel bone cement.

Authors:  Tiina Juvonen; Juha-Pekka Nuutinen; Arto P Koistinen; Heikki Kröger; Reijo Lappalainen
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.