Literature DB >> 17934790

Improving the specificity of immunodiagnosis for porcine brucellosis.

R E Thirlwall1, N J Commander, S D Brew, S J Cutler, J A McGiven, J A Stack.   

Abstract

This report describes the use of cell mediated immunity to improve specificity of current diagnosis for Brucella suis. Diagnosis is problematic due to cross reactions that lead to false positive serological reactions (FPSR) in the standard diagnostic tests. A common cause of this cross reactivity is infection with the organism Yersinia enterocolitica O:9. Gottingen mini-pigs were experimentally infected with B. suis biovar I field strain or Y. enterocolitica serotype O:9 biotype 3. Infection was followed for 70 days. During this time whole blood stimulation assays were set up using Brucella specific antigen. IFNgamma was measured in the supernatants (SN) from these assays by ELISA. Concurrent standard serological tests were carried out. The results indicate that the IFNgamma assay is specifically able to distinguish Y. enterocolitica O:9 infection from a B. suis infection in experimentally infected mini-pigs. These results represent an improvement in diagnostic specificity compared to currently used serological tests. Thus suggesting that in a surveillance setting this test could be applied as a confirmatory test in the face of FPSR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17934790     DOI: 10.1007/s11259-007-9023-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Res Commun        ISSN: 0165-7380            Impact factor:   2.459


  13 in total

1.  [Contribution to the differentiation of cross-reacting antibodies in brucellosis serology--1. Reactions with various Yersinia serotypes and antibody avidity].

Authors:  C Staak; A Draeger; P Bahn; K Nöckler
Journal:  Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 0.328

2.  A practical method for routine blood cultures in brucellosis.

Authors:  M R CASTANEDA
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1947-01

3.  Cell-mediated immune responses differentiate infections with Brucella suis from Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 in pigs.

Authors:  U Riber; G Jungersen
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 2.046

4.  Brucellosis in the European Union and Norway at the turn of the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Jacques Godfroid; Annemarie Käsbohrer
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Serological cross-reactivity between Brucella abortus and yersinia enterocolitica 0:9: IV. Evaluation of the M- and C-epitope antibody response for the specific detection of B. abortus infections.

Authors:  R Kittelberger; P G Bundesen; A Cloeckaert; I Greiser-Wilke; J J Letesson
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  1998-02-15       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9 I immunoblot analysis of the antibody response to Brucella protein antigens in bovine brucellosis.

Authors:  R Kittelberger; F Hilbink; M F Hansen; M Penrose; G W de Lisle; J J Letesson; B Garin-Bastuji; J Searson; C A Fossati; A Cloeckaert
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9 II the use of Yersinia outer proteins for the specific detection of Yersinia enterocolitica infections in ruminants.

Authors:  R Kittelberger; F Hilbink; M F Hansen; G P Ross; M A Joyce; S Fenwick; J Heesemann; H Wolf-Watz; K Nielsen
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9. III. Specificity of the in vitro antigen-specific gamma interferon test for bovine brucellosis diagnosis in experimentally Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9-infected cattle.

Authors:  R Kittelberger; M P Reichel; M A Joyce; C Staak
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  1997-10-16       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Serological relationship between cattle exposed to Brucella abortus, Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 and Escherichia coli O157:H7.

Authors:  K Nielsen; P Smith; J Widdison; D Gall; L Kelly; W Kelly; P Nicoletti
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Comparison of the biotypes of Yersinia enterocolitica isolated from pigs, cattle and sheep at slaughter and from humans with yersiniosis in Great Britain during 1999-2000.

Authors:  A McNally; T Cheasty; C Fearnley; R W Dalziel; G A Paiba; G Manning; D G Newell
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.858

View more
  4 in total

1.  Raman spectroscopy as a potential tool for detection of Brucella spp. in milk.

Authors:  Susann Meisel; Stephan Stöckel; Mandy Elschner; Falk Melzer; Petra Rösch; Jürgen Popp
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Investigating the use of protein saver cards for storage and subsequent detection of bovine anti-Brucella abortus smooth lipopolysaccharide antibodies and gamma interferon.

Authors:  Lucy Duncombe; Nicola J Commander; Sevil Erdenlig; John A McGiven; Judy Stack
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2013-08-28

3.  False positive seroreactivity to brucellosis in tuberculosis patients: a prevalence study.

Authors:  Mojtaba Varshochi; Jafar Majidi; Marjan Amini; Kamyar Ghabili; Mohammadali M Shoja
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2011-03-14

4.  In situ microscopy analysis reveals local innate immune response developed around Brucella infected cells in resistant and susceptible mice.

Authors:  Richard Copin; Marie-Alice Vitry; Delphine Hanot Mambres; Arnaud Machelart; Carl De Trez; Jean-Marie Vanderwinden; Stefan Magez; Shizuo Akira; Bernhard Ryffel; Yves Carlier; Jean-Jacques Letesson; Eric Muraille
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 6.823

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.