Literature DB >> 15135510

Serological relationship between cattle exposed to Brucella abortus, Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 and Escherichia coli O157:H7.

K Nielsen1, P Smith, J Widdison, D Gall, L Kelly, W Kelly, P Nicoletti.   

Abstract

Sera from cattle naturally infected with Brucella abortus (n = 160), vaccinated with B. abortus S19 (n = 88) or immunized with Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 (n = 25) or Escherichia coli O157:H7 (n = 80) were collected. The sera were compared for antibody content to the same bacteria by indirect enzyme immunoassay (IELISA), fluorescence polarization assay (FPA) and competitive enzyme immunoassay (CELISA). Cattle sera (n = 523) collected randomly from across Canada were tested in the same tests. Sera from the B. abortus infected group reacted positively in the brucellosis IELISA (IELISA(Br)), CELISA and FPA (FPA(Br)) and the Y. enterocolitica IELISA (IELISA(Ye)) while the Y. enterocolitica FPA (FPA(Ye)) detected antibody in 93.8% and the E. coli IELISA (IELISA(Ec)) 86.9% and the E. coli FPA (FPA(Ec)) 48.1%. About 70% of the sera from B. abortus S19 vaccinated animals reacted in the three IELISAs, 45% in the CELISA, and 37.7% in the FPA(Ec), 21.6% in the FPA(Br) and 5.7% in the FPA(Ye). Sera from E. coli O:157 exposed cattle reacted mainly in the IELISA(Ec) and FPA(Ec) although surprisingly 87.5% reacted in the IELISA(Ye) and only 3.8% in the IELISA(Br). No reactions were observed with these sera in the FPA(Br) and FPA(Ye) but one serum gave a low positive reaction in the CELISA. All sera from Y. enterocolitica O:9 exposed cattle reacted in the IELISA(Br) and IELISA(Ye) and 80% in the IELISA(Ec). In the CELISA, 44% gave a positive reaction and 64% were positive in the FPA(Br), 28% in the FPA(Ye) and 12% in the FPA(Ec). Of the 523 Canadian sera, about 50% reacted in the E. coli tests with only minor reactions in the Y. enterocolitica O:9 and B. abortus assays. From the data, the cross reaction between E. coli O157:H7, Y. enterocilitica O:9 and B. abortus is dependent on the test used. Thus, extensive cross reaction was observed with the IELISA with much less reactivity in the FPA and the CELISA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15135510     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  27 in total

1.  Brucellosis among smallholder cattle farmers in Zambia: public health significance.

Authors:  John Bwalya Muma; Girja Shankar Pandey; Musso Munyeme; Chisoni Mumba; Ethel Mkandawire; Henry Mwelwa Chimana
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Survey of brucellosis at the wildlife-livestock interface on the Zimbabwean side of the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area.

Authors:  Calvin Gomo; Michel de Garine-Wichatitsky; Alexandre Caron; Davies Mubika Pfukenyi
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Recombinant Omp2b antigen-based ELISA is an efficient tool for specific serodiagnosis of animal brucellosis.

Authors:  Melody Vatankhah; Nazanin Beheshti; Shiva Mirkalantari; Nima Khoramabadi; Haniyeh Aghababa; Mehdi Mahdavi
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 2.476

4.  Prevalence of antibodies to Brucella spp. and individual risk factors of infection in traditional cattle, goats and sheep reared in livestock-wildlife interface areas of Zambia.

Authors:  J B Muma; K L Samui; V M Siamudaala; J Oloya; G Matop; M K Omer; M Munyeme; C Mubita; E Skjerve
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.559

5.  Specificity dependence between serological tests for diagnosing bovine brucellosis in Brucella-free farms showing false positive serological reactions due to Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.

Authors:  Raúl C Mainar-Jaime; Pilar M Muñoz; María J de Miguel; María J Grilló; Clara M Marín; Ignacio Moriyón; José M Blasco
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.008

6.  Sustained and differential antibody responses to virulence proteins of Brucella melitensis during acute and chronic infections in human brucellosis.

Authors:  J Xu; Y Qiu; M Cui; Y Ke; Q Zhen; X Yuan; Y Yu; X Du; J Yuan; H Song; Z Wang; G Gao; S Yu; Y Wang; L Huang; Z Chen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Latex agglutination using the periplasmic proteins antigen of Brucella melitensis is a successful, rapid, and specific serodiagnostic test for ovine brucellosis.

Authors:  Alaa Bassuny Ismael; Ayman Abdel-Aziz Swelum; Salama A-H Mostafa; Abdel-Rahman A Alhumiany
Journal:  Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.219

8.  VirB12 is a serological marker of Brucella infection in experimental and natural hosts.

Authors:  Hortensia G Rolán; Andreas B den Hartigh; Melissa Kahl-McDonagh; Thomas Ficht; L Garry Adams; Renée M Tsolis
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2007-12-12

9.  Limitations of the BP26 protein-based indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of Brucellosis.

Authors:  Ting Xin; Hongjun Yang; Nan Wang; Fang Wang; Peng Zhao; Haiguang Wang; Kairong Mao; Hongfei Zhu; Jiabo Ding
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2013-07-17

10.  Validation of a simple universal IELISA for the diagnosis of human brucellosis.

Authors:  S M Ayala; D B Hasan; C A Celestino; G I Escobar; D M Zhao; N E Lucero
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.