Literature DB >> 8748542

Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9 II the use of Yersinia outer proteins for the specific detection of Yersinia enterocolitica infections in ruminants.

R Kittelberger1, F Hilbink, M F Hansen, G P Ross, M A Joyce, S Fenwick, J Heesemann, H Wolf-Watz, K Nielsen.   

Abstract

Yersinia outer protein (YOP) preparations from Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis were used as antigens in immunoblots for the detection of Yersinia infections in experimentally and naturally infected ruminants. Sera from 9 groups of animals were used: (1) 51 sera from cattle which were false-positive in the standard brucellosis serological tests, (2) 52 sera from brucellosis-negative cattle, (3) 51 sera from a deer herd in which 16 animals were positive in the brucellosis tests and Yersina species were isolated from 5 animals, (4) 50 sera from a deer herd in which sera from all animals were negative in the brucellosis tests, (5) 107 sera from brucellosis-negative cattle which were received from throughout New Zealand, (6) 30 sera from cattle naturally infected with B. abortus and from which B. abortus was isolated, (7) 55 sera from cattle naturally infected with B. abortus, (8) 26 sera from cattle experimentally infected with B. abortus, with mostly high titres in the conventional brucellosis tests, and (9) sera taken weekly from 3 cattle experimentally infected with Y. enterocolitica 0:9. In all 3 Y. enterocolitica 0:9 experimentally infected animals the antibody reactivity against major YOPs in the Y. enterocolitica and in the Y. pseudotuberculosis YOP preparation correlated well with the strength in the classical brucellosis tests and with the staining of smooth lipopolysaccharides (SLPS) in blots, thus confirming the usefulness of YOPs for the detection of Yersinia infections. Sera from naturally infected cattle and deer herds, regardless of whether they were false positive or negative in the brucellosis tests, showed high frequencies of staining in YOP blots (53-58% in cattle and 80-100% in deer), indicating a high prevalence of field infections with Yersinia species in New Zealand. In two of the three sera groups from B. abortus infected animals, antibodies against YOPs were detected with high frequency, showing that dual infections may be common and may interfere with differential serological testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8748542     DOI: 10.1016/0378-1135(95)00121-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  10 in total

1.  Validated 5' nuclease PCR assay for rapid identification of the genus Brucella.

Authors:  T Bogdanovich; M Skurnik; P S Lübeck; P Ahrens; J Hoorfar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of a western blot method for the detection of Yersinia antibodies: evidence of serological cross-reactivity between Yersinia outer membrane proteins and Borrelia burgdorferi.

Authors:  Mindy L Rawlins; Cecilia Gerstner; Harry R Hill; Christine M Litwin
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2005-11

3.  Comparative study on responses of cattle and water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) to experimental inoculation of Brucella abortus biovar 1 by the intraconjunctival route--a preliminary report.

Authors:  Abiodun A Adesiyun; Geoff T Fosgate; Anil Persad; Mervyn Campbell; Ravi Seebaransingh; Alva Stewart-Johnson
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Humoral immune response against lipopolysaccharide and cytoplasmic proteins of Brucella abortus in cattle vaccinated with B. abortus S19 or experimentally infected with Yersinia enterocolitica serotype 0:9.

Authors:  P C Baldi; G H Giambartolomei; F A Goldbaum; L F Abdón; C A Velikovsky; R Kittelberger; C A Fossati
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  1996-07

5.  Efficacy of several serological tests and antigens for diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in the presence of false-positive serological results due to Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.

Authors:  P M Muñoz; C M Marín; D Monreal; D González; B Garin-Bastuji; R Díaz; R C Mainar-Jaime; I Moriyón; J M Blasco
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2005-01

6.  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to differentiate the antibody responses of animals infected with Brucella species from those of animals infected with Yersinia enterocolitica O9.

Authors:  Janchivdorj Erdenebaatar; Balgan Bayarsaikhan; Masahisa Watarai; Sou-ichi Makino; Toshikazu Shirahata
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2003-07

7.  Improving the specificity of immunodiagnosis for porcine brucellosis.

Authors:  R E Thirlwall; N J Commander; S D Brew; S J Cutler; J A McGiven; J A Stack
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 2.459

8.  Brucellosis: review on the recent trends in pathogenicity and laboratory diagnosis.

Authors:  Supriya Christopher; B L Umapathy; K L Ravikumar
Journal:  J Lab Physicians       Date:  2010-07

9.  Latent class evaluation of the performance of serological tests for exposure to Brucella spp. in cattle, sheep, and goats in Tanzania.

Authors:  Rebecca F Bodenham; Stella Mazeri; Sarah Cleaveland; John A Crump; Folorunso O Fasina; William A de Glanville; Daniel T Haydon; Rudovick R Kazwala; Tito J Kibona; Venance P Maro; Michael J Maze; Blandina T Mmbaga; Niwael J Mtui-Malamsha; Gabriel M Shirima; Emanuel S Swai; Kate M Thomas; Barend M deC Bronsvoort; Jo E B Halliday
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2021-08-24

10.  IS711-based real-time PCR assay as a tool for detection of Brucella spp. in wild boars and comparison with bacterial isolation and serology.

Authors:  Vladimira Hinić; Isabelle Brodard; Andreas Thomann; Milena Holub; Raymond Miserez; Carlos Abril
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 2.741

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.