Literature DB >> 8748541

Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9 I immunoblot analysis of the antibody response to Brucella protein antigens in bovine brucellosis.

R Kittelberger1, F Hilbink, M F Hansen, M Penrose, G W de Lisle, J J Letesson, B Garin-Bastuji, J Searson, C A Fossati, A Cloeckaert.   

Abstract

Sera from three groups of Brucella abortus infected cattle were examined in immunoblots with the following antigens: sodium dodecyl sulfate/mercapto ethanol (SDS/ME) extracts of two rought B. abortus strains (45/20 and RB51) and rough B. ovis, smooth lipopolysaccharides (SLPS) from B. abortus strain 99 and Y. enterocolitica 0:9, and a cytoplasmic extract from smooth B. abortus strain 19-S. The sera groups were: (1) 26 sera from animals, experimentally infected with B. abortus strain 544, which were all positive in the conventional brucellosis serological tests; (2) 152 sera from naturally infected cattle herds with varying titres in the conventional brucellosis tests, and (3) 30 sera from naturally infected cattle with varying titres in the conventional brucellosis tests and from which B. abortus was cultured. B. abortus strain 99 and Y. enterocolitica serotype 0:9 SLPS staining showed up frequently in all sera groups and correlated well with the strength in the conventional brucellosis tests, confirming the immunodominance of SLPS in B. abortus infections. Another immunodominant component of 50-80 kDa was found in the rough B. abortus 45/20 antigen preparation but not in the B. abortus RB51 and in the B. ovis cell extracts. This component was also recognised by sera from Y. enterocolitica 0:9 infected cattle and is probably a protein-lipopolysaccharide complex. Although many of the sera from B. abortus infected cattle with high titres in the conventional brucellosis tests showed complex protein staining patterns in blots, no protein bands other than the 50-80 kDa bands were found to be immunodominant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8748541     DOI: 10.1016/0378-1135(95)00122-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  8 in total

1.  Humoral immune responses of Brucella-infected cattle, sheep, and goats to eight purified recombinant Brucella proteins in an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Authors:  J J Letesson; A Tibor; G van Eynde; V Wansard; V Weynants; P Denoel; E Saman
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  1997-09

2.  Evaluation of a western blot method for the detection of Yersinia antibodies: evidence of serological cross-reactivity between Yersinia outer membrane proteins and Borrelia burgdorferi.

Authors:  Mindy L Rawlins; Cecilia Gerstner; Harry R Hill; Christine M Litwin
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2005-11

3.  Humoral immune response against lipopolysaccharide and cytoplasmic proteins of Brucella abortus in cattle vaccinated with B. abortus S19 or experimentally infected with Yersinia enterocolitica serotype 0:9.

Authors:  P C Baldi; G H Giambartolomei; F A Goldbaum; L F Abdón; C A Velikovsky; R Kittelberger; C A Fossati
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  1996-07

4.  Efficacy of several serological tests and antigens for diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in the presence of false-positive serological results due to Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.

Authors:  P M Muñoz; C M Marín; D Monreal; D González; B Garin-Bastuji; R Díaz; R C Mainar-Jaime; I Moriyón; J M Blasco
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2005-01

5.  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to differentiate the antibody responses of animals infected with Brucella species from those of animals infected with Yersinia enterocolitica O9.

Authors:  Janchivdorj Erdenebaatar; Balgan Bayarsaikhan; Masahisa Watarai; Sou-ichi Makino; Toshikazu Shirahata
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2003-07

6.  Differentiation between serological responses to Brucella suis and Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 after natural or experimental infection in pigs.

Authors:  G Jungersen; V Sørensen; S B Giese; J A Stack; U Riber
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.451

7.  Improving the specificity of immunodiagnosis for porcine brucellosis.

Authors:  R E Thirlwall; N J Commander; S D Brew; S J Cutler; J A McGiven; J A Stack
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 2.459

8.  Serosurveillance for livestock pathogens in free-ranging mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus).

Authors:  Annette Roug; Pamela Swift; Steven Torres; Karen Jones; Christine K Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.