Literature DB >> 9595626

Serological cross-reactivity between Brucella abortus and yersinia enterocolitica 0:9: IV. Evaluation of the M- and C-epitope antibody response for the specific detection of B. abortus infections.

R Kittelberger1, P G Bundesen, A Cloeckaert, I Greiser-Wilke, J J Letesson.   

Abstract

Smooth lipopolysaccharides (SLPS) from Brucella abortus contain A-epitopes against which the majority of serum antibodies are directed during infections. SLPS from Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9 possesses identical epitopes, which are the cause for serological cross-reactivity. All Brucella spp. possess M- and C-epitopes which are not present in Y. enterocolitica 0:9. In order to examine the usefulness of these M- and C-epitopes for discriminatory serological testing, a panel of sera were used in this study, comprising sera from Y. enterocolitica 0:9-infected heifers, sera from B. abortus-infected cattle of comparable strength in the serological brucellosis tests to the sera from Y. enterocolitica 0:9-infected heifers, sera from B. abortus-infected bovines with strong serological reactions and sera from animals free from B. abortus or Y. enterocolitica infections. These sera were tested in blocking ELISAs with seven M- and one C-epitope-specific monoclonal antibodies in combination with SLPS from B. melitensis M16 high in M-epitopes as antigen. Strong B. abortus sera inhibited most strongly, while negative sera showed no or little inhibition. Sera with weak or intermediate titres blocked to a lower extent. Unexpectedly, the sera from Y. enterocolitica 0:9-infected heifers showed inhibition behaviour virtually identical to the comparable sera from B. abortus infected animals. Absorbing out of the A-epitope specific serum antibodies with either Y. enterocolitica 0:9 SLPS or with Y. enterocolitica 0:9 bacteria, indicated the presence of M- or C-epitope-specific serum antibodies in some sera from B. abortus-infected cattle but not in the sera from Y. enterocolitica 0:9-infected animals. These results demonstrate that the M- or C-epitope-specific antibody response in sera from B. abortus infected cattle is only of limited value for the serological discrimination between B. abortus and Y. enterocolitica 0:9 infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9595626     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(97)00202-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of competitive ELISA for detection of antibodies to Brucella infection in domestic animals.

Authors:  Lorraine L Perrett; John A McGiven; Simon D Brew; Judy A Stack
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.351

2.  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to differentiate the antibody responses of animals infected with Brucella species from those of animals infected with Yersinia enterocolitica O9.

Authors:  Janchivdorj Erdenebaatar; Balgan Bayarsaikhan; Masahisa Watarai; Sou-ichi Makino; Toshikazu Shirahata
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2003-07

3.  Differentiation between serological responses to Brucella suis and Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 after natural or experimental infection in pigs.

Authors:  G Jungersen; V Sørensen; S B Giese; J A Stack; U Riber
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.451

4.  Time-resolved fluorescent resonance energy transfer assay for simple and rapid detection of anti-Brucella antibodies in ruminant serum samples.

Authors:  John A McGiven; Iain J Thompson; Nicola J Commander; Judy A Stack
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Improving the specificity of immunodiagnosis for porcine brucellosis.

Authors:  R E Thirlwall; N J Commander; S D Brew; S J Cutler; J A McGiven; J A Stack
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 2.459

6.  Herd prevalence of bovine brucellosis and analysis of risk factors in cattle in urban and peri-urban areas of the Kampala economic zone, Uganda.

Authors:  Kohei Makita; Eric M Fèvre; Charles Waiswa; Mark C Eisler; Michael Thrusfield; Susan C Welburn
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  A protein-conjugate approach to develop a monoclonal antibody-based antigen detection test for the diagnosis of human brucellosis.

Authors:  Kailash P Patra; Mayuko Saito; Vidya L Atluri; Hortensia G Rolán; Briana Young; Tobias Kerrinnes; Henk Smits; Jessica N Ricaldi; Eduardo Gotuzzo; Robert H Gilman; Renee M Tsolis; Joseph M Vinetz
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2014-06-05

8.  Development of a Multiplex Bead Assay to Detect Serological Responses to Brucella Species in Domestic Pigs and Wild Boar with the Potential to Overcome Cross-Reactivity with Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.

Authors:  Antonia Touloudi; John McGiven; Shaun Cawthraw; George Valiakos; Polychronis Kostoulas; Lucy Duncombe; Christian Gortázar; Mariana Boadella; Marina Sofia; Zoi Athanasakopoulou; Dimitris C Chatzopoulos; Vassiliki Spyrou; Liljana Petrovska; Charalambos Billinis
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-07-06

9.  Serosurveillance of Coxiellosis (Q-fever) and Brucellosis in goats in selected provinces of Lao People's Democratic Republic.

Authors:  Rebekah J L Burns; Bounlom Douangngeun; Watthana Theppangna; Syseng Khounsy; Mavuto Mukaka; Paul W Selleck; Eric Hansson; Matthew D Wegner; Peter A Windsor; Stuart D Blacksell
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2018-04-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.