Literature DB >> 17929692

Hemispatial asymmetries in judgment of stimulus size.

Jennifer Charles1, Arash Sahraie, Peter McGeorge.   

Abstract

Recent research has demonstrated a leftward bias in judgments of size. In the present experiments, hemispatial size bias was measured through simultaneous presentation of a circle and an ellipse varying in horizontal or vertical extent. A consistent leftward bias of horizontal size judgments (but not vertical) was obtained; at the point of subjective equality, the width of the objects that were presented in left hemispace was smaller than the width of the objects that were presented in right hemispace. These data suggest that the horizontal extent of stimuli appear larger in left hemispace than in right hemispace. Results also indicated that symmetrical stimulus presentation, with respect to the vertical meridian, is required for the bias to emerge. Furthermore, increasing or decreasing stimulus eccentricity weakened the effect. Attenuation of this bias upon the manipulation of parameters indicates that this phenomenon is context specific and is affected by similar parameters that are known to influence the magnitude of error in pseudoneglect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17929692     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  20 in total

1.  Electroencephalographic evidence of vector inversion in antipointing.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Jon Bell; Clay B Holroyd; Olav Krigolson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Left of centre: asymmetries for the horizontal vertical line illusion.

Authors:  Elisha K Josev; Jason D Forte; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-11-25

3.  Spatial distortions in localization and midline estimation in hemianopia and normal vision.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Thomas M VanVleet; Michael A Silver; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Anti-pointing is mediated by a perceptual bias of target location in left and right visual space.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Anika Maraj; Ashlee Gradkowski; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Antipointing: perception-based visual information renders an offline mode of control.

Authors:  Anika Maraj; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Spatial asymmetries in viewing and remembering scenes: consequences of an attentional bias?

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Helene Intraub
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Asymmetrical effects of adaptation to left- and right-shifting prisms depends on pre-existing attentional biases.

Authors:  Kelly M Goedert; Andrew Leblanc; Sen-Wei Tsai; Anna M Barrett
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 2.892

8.  Flanker interference effects in a line bisection task.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi; Tina Iachini; Alessandro Iavarone; Giovanni Messina; Andrea Viggiano; Marcellino Monda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Representational pseudoneglect for detecting changes to Rey-Osterrieth figures.

Authors:  Ellie Aniulis; Owen Churches; Nicole A Thomas; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Hemifield asymmetry in the potency of exogenous auditory and visual cues.

Authors:  Yamaya Sosa; Aaron M Clarke; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.