Literature DB >> 21447353

Hemifield asymmetry in the potency of exogenous auditory and visual cues.

Yamaya Sosa1, Aaron M Clarke, Mark E McCourt.   

Abstract

Neurologically normal subjects misperceive the midpoints of lines (PSE) as reliably leftward of veridical center, a phenomenon known as pseudoneglect. This leftward bias reflects the dominance of the right cerebral hemisphere in deploying spatial attention. Transient visual cues, delivered to either the left or right endpoints of lines, modulate PSE such that leftward biases are increased by leftward cues, and are decreased by rightward cues, relative to a no-cue control condition. We ask whether lateralized auditory cues can similarly influence PSE in a tachistoscopic visual line bisection task, and describe how visual and auditory cues, in spatially synergistic or antagonistic combinations, jointly influence PSE. Our results demonstrate that whereas auditory and visual cues both modulate PSE, visual cues are overall more potent than auditory cues. Visual and auditory cues are weighted such that visual cues are significantly more potent than auditory cues when visual cues are delivered to left hemispace. Visual and auditory cues are equipotent when visual cues are delivered to right hemispace. These results are consistent with the existence of independent lateralized networks governing the deployment of visuospatial and audiospatial attention. An analysis of the weighting of unisensory visual and auditory cues which optimally predicts PSE in multisensory cue conditions shows that cues combine additively. There was no evidence for a superadditive multisensory cue combination.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21447353      PMCID: PMC3090532          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  82 in total

1.  Auditory midline and spatial discrimination in patients with unilateral neglect.

Authors:  R Cusack; R P Carlyon; I H Robertson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Performance consistency of normal observers in forced-choice tachistoscopic visual line bisection.

Authors:  M E McCourt
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  The influence of viewing eye on pseudoneglect magnitude.

Authors:  M E McCourt; M Garlinghouse; J Butler
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.892

4.  Can free-viewing perceptual asymmetries be explained by scanning, pre-motor or attentional biases?

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Georgina R Roberts
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration.

Authors:  David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention.

Authors:  M Kinsbourne
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1970

7.  The anatomy of spatial neglect based on voxelwise statistical analysis: a study of 140 patients.

Authors:  Hans-Otto Karnath; Monika Fruhmann Berger; Wilhelm Küker; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Right hemisphere control of visuospatial attention: line-bisection judgments evaluated with high-density electrical mapping and source analysis.

Authors:  John J Foxe; Mark E McCourt; Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Multisensory auditory-visual interactions during early sensory processing in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study.

Authors:  Sophie Molholm; Walter Ritter; Micah M Murray; Daniel C Javitt; Charles E Schroeder; John J Foxe
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-06

10.  An investigation of hemispatial neglect using the Landmark Task.

Authors:  M Harvey; A D Milner; R C Roberts
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.310

View more
  2 in total

1.  An event-related FMRI study of exogenous orienting across vision and audition.

Authors:  Zhen Yang; Andrew R Mayer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Re-weighting of Sound Localization Cues by Audiovisual Training.

Authors:  Daniel P Kumpik; Connor Campbell; Jan W H Schnupp; Andrew J King
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.677

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.